Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 4

< February 3	February 5 >

February 4

Template:TBS Kin'yō Dorama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TBS Kin'yō Dorama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Looks more like promo for a time table than a real navigation template. The Banner talk 18:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Similar to the 2 below. Unsuitable for a template, only being related by being shown at the same time and day on the same channel. Nigej (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We are not a TV guide (WP:NOT). --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Axis of Justice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Axis of Justice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Majority of links are covered by {{Serj Tankian}} and {{Tom Morello}} and are not directly related to the organisation. --wooden superman 15:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. When irrelevant links are trimmed, not enough to justify a navbox. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SET Taiwan TV drama on Weekdays at 20:00

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SET Taiwan TV drama on Weekdays at 20:00 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Looks more like promo for a TV timetable than a real navigation template The Banner talk 11:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Sharing a broadcaster and a time slot is not a sufficient connection for a navbox. --wooden superman 16:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Woodensuperman. GN-z11 ^☎ ^★ 17:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsuitable for template. If the topic is important enough (which seems doubtful to me) it should be an article. Nigej (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We are not a TV guide (WP:NOT). --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Public Television Service drama on Saturdays at 21:00

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Public Television Service drama on Saturdays at 21:00 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Looks more like promo for a time table than a real navigation template. Used in just on (very poor) article: On Children The Banner talk 11:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Sharing a broadcaster and a time slot is not a sufficient connection for a navbox. --wooden superman 16:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Woodensuperman....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We are not a TV guide (WP:NOT). --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Narnia character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Infobox Narnia character to Template:Infobox character. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Narnia character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox Narnia character with Template:Infobox character.
No need for a separate custom template Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support merger with exceptions - I oppose the addition of the |major#= and |film#= parameters. Those can become giant lists very fast and are not suitable for a summary infobox, but should be discussed in the article itself. --Gonnym (talk) 07:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gonnym: 100% agree. No plan to merge those params. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, or replace and delete, per the esteemed Gonnym. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox wuxia fiction character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Infobox wuxia fiction character to Template:Infobox character. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox wuxia fiction character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox wuxia fiction character with Template:Infobox character.
No need for a separate custom template. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support merger with exceptions - I oppose the addition of the |appearances= as it can become a giant list very fast and is not suitable for a summary infobox, but should be discussed in the article itself. Not sure about all the skill and ability parameters as I'm not familiar with this topic so don't know if those are important or trivia. --Gonnym (talk) 08:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, or replace and delete, per the esteemed Gonnym. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Union Republics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Union Republics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No article-namespace transclusions. One transclusion in the "User:" namespace. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete unused. Nigej (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete although I must say, very visually appealing. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).