Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 12
June 12
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:9pins res start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:9pins res (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused Frietjes (talk) 22:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Sphilbrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
seems redundant since all the links are already in Template:Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Frietjes (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete under WP:CSD#T3 as a duplication. --woodensuperman 13:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, unnecessary duplication. GiantSnowman 09:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as long as the template is replaced with the overall Spurs one on the relevant articles. I am assuming that when I created this template, the singles weren't included in the main club template. Maybe I should have just added them into that, rather than creating a new template but hey...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:16, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- you are correct, the songs were added in January 2018. given your comments here, and that you are the only substantial author, I have replaced this template with the main one and tagged it for speedy deletion. Frietjes (talk) 17:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
No parent article, so notability not established. --woodensuperman 11:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:00, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- delete, article first (if notable), then navbox (if article exists). Frietjes (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
No parent article, so notability not established. --woodensuperman 11:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- delete, article first (if notable), then navbox (if article exists). Frietjes (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Only three notable entries. Not enough to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 11:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- delete, article first (if notable), then navbox (if article exists). Frietjes (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:41, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
No parent article, so notability not established. --woodensuperman 11:47, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- delete, article first (if notable), then navbox (if article exists). Frietjes (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:41, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Tinman Elite (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only two notable entries. Not enough to warrant a navbox. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 11:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- delete, article first (if notable), then navbox (if article exists). Frietjes (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).