Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 4
September 4
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 23. Primefac (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Cite journal: Rice cetacea classification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I think this should probably be individually cited rather than transcluded in specific pages. While we do have cite-specific sources, those tend toward having at least one parameter for use as a template. It is named oddly too. Izno (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- substitute and delete, not the best use of a template. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).