Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 30

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 8. Primefac (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Primefac (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 12:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst-only template that hasn't been used since 2008. Izno (talk) 21:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was "subst" and delete via histmerge. I know this may seem like an odd closing rationale, but the Timeline of Rabindranath Tagore is a transclusion of the template plus a sentence and a navbox. Preserving the history of the template is possible because there are not parallel histories. Primefac (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after suitable replacement is made (looks like one of them is a {{merged from}} candidate). Primefac (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two-use template that doesn't seem to have been adopted in the past decade. (I'm doubtful that {{article history}} couldn't do this now either.) Izno (talk) 20:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A subst-only template used only 4 times. Izno (talk) 20:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 12:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused. TheImaCow (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Not sure if this could be speedily deleted under G6, but this navbox serves no purpose: apart from being created under the wrong name, the only bluelink to any album or song is to an unrelated article. So the only bluelinks left are to Wikipedia articles for the band's record labels, which aren't directly related to the band. Richard3120 (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Izno (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - This is a remnant of a feature of the Trains WikiProject banner that is not used. The feature was better integrated into the project banner when the banner was redesigned in 2009. Slambo (Speak) 19:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox; contains only one blue link. TheImaCow (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. to {{quote}} after ensuring parameter/output compatibility with that template. Primefac (talk) 23:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not obviously necessary non-guideline compliant template (MOS:QUOTE, MOS:COLLAPSE) that forks Template:Quote and is used only 5 times. Izno (talk) 17:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this template is overly specific and therefore, not needed. It's only used on about 100+ pages, and typically used on pages like this to add meaningless empty sections (Notes, Other Information, etc). At a push, it could be merged into Template:More citations needed section. This template was nominated about two years ago, but with little participation. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clean-up work. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. This is an empty copy of the schedule in 2019–20 Pittsburgh Penguins season Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Even if it were to be used it a) wouldn't be its own template and b) wouldn't use deprecated NavFrame. Izno (talk) 17:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Pulling this since this isn't really the point of the exercise and it seems to be doing fruitful things. No prejudice against someone renominating. Izno (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Nothing so excessive as to need its own page. Izno (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On review, I'm actually concerned that this is an automated task affecting mainspace content without an approval. Thoughts are welcome. --Izno (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I bumped into this template is that I am trying to remove uses of deprecated NavFrame, so it is also possible I will be reverted on that point. --Izno (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Izno: Is this not a minor modification (transcluding a template that the bot edits, rather than a direct edit of the given page) of the task that was approved at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SpaceFactsBot? --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That was not linked on the user page. oof. Good start there. --Izno (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst-only template that appears never to have been used. Izno (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. May not be generally valuable per WP:NOT. Izno (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

single-use template Izno (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 7. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A navbox based upon a common thematic element, the Arthurian legend (or, the Matter of Britain). That fails WP:NAVBOX: there is no single coherent subject like 'Arthurian legend video game'. Different styles of gameplay, different developers and the articles listed do not refer to each other. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 7. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all links redirect to David Gemmell. TheImaCow (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, contains only one link TheImaCow (talk) 09:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WP:RFPP is for cases of "much vandalism". TheImaCow (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems not very useful. TheImaCow (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox; contains only one blue link. TheImaCow (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. TheImaCow (talk) 08:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused template, undeveloped for at least 6 months. none of the entries seem to have articles either -- AquaDTRS (talk) 03:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was split. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One could argue that having Macron and de Gaulle in the same template as Napoleon is not entirely insane but putting them alongside Louis XIV, Charlemagne, and Clovis I undoubtedly is. Also, "heads of state of the Franks" is a ridiculous Wikipedia neologism. This should be split into at least two templates, Template:Monarchs of France and Template:Presidents of France. Surtsicna (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

FART templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

s-line data module

{{s-line}} templates for the Regional Bus and Rail Company of Ticino (Italian: Ferrovie Autolinee Regionali Ticinesi...). Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/FART. All transclusions replaced. There is one dependent s-line data module that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 00:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 7. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).