Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 4

< February 3	February 5 >

February 4

Redirects to Template:Draft article

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. By me. (Oops.) Enterprisey (talk!) 09:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Drafting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Talkspace draft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused redirects; we already have {{Draft}}. (This will also simplify the AfC helper script code.) Enterprisey (talk!) 23:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete shouldn't this go to WP:RfD though? Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you're completely right. Oops. Enterprisey (talk!) 09:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Instructions for requested photographs in law sport and science Wikiproject

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Instructions for requested photographs in law sport and science Wikiproject (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless template. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Law, Sport, And Science Whpq (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete With the "project" gone, the instructions can clearly go too. Nigej (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly should no longer exist. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 Philippine Senate election results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2022 Philippine Senate election results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With more than a year to go before the election, there is no need to set up this template so early. Alcremie (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The process of determining candidates has begun. It is already the time of the invisible primary season. Showiecz (talk) 11:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article here: 2022 Philippine Senate election about the election. A "results" template at this stage seems useless. And, of course, it shouldn't be a template anyway, should be directly in the article. Nigej (talk) 12:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Even when the election results are known, the results are article content and should be entered directly in the article and not in a template. - Whpq (talk) 13:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice for recreation later. This was created WP:TOOSOON. Results are templated for every election since 1941 as these are transcluded on multiple articles. Once we have an official list of candidates this can be recreated. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:22 and 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:22 and 5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is only one date and it is not used. Alcremie (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Part of some vandalism that was intended to create a fake birth date. Nigej (talk) 10:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:City versus Poly football annual results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:City versus Poly football annual results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Content in the template space used on only 2 pages without hope of expansion. I am not personally a fan of section transclusion, but if that's the end implemenation, no complaint on my part. Izno (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to Baltimore City College football. City–Poly football rivalry currently redirects there, and would be a better place if that article existed. Also appears in Baltimore Polytechnic Institute but is clearly overly detailed there, for a general article about the institute. Perhaps could replaced in that article with a link to City–Poly football rivalry, even though that is currently a redirect. Nigej (talk) 10:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FootballVariantAlert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I have moved it to userspace. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FootballVariantAlert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template, only used on one user page. Subst and delete. Izno (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It also looks like Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Association football variants task force is effectively dead and should be considered for deletion/merging. Number 5 7 12:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).