Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< July 2 July 4 >

July 3

edit

Template:Clinical dosage ranges of oral and injectable androgens and anabolic steroids

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recently unused. Should be substituted on a relevant space. If not, then delete. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer USA Track & Field Legend Coach Award

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 10. ✗plicit 23:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Provincial ministries of Pakistan

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:58, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contains only a redirect. No navigation. Asked the creator about his intentions, but did not receive a response. Can be userified since it seems to be a work in progress. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox PBA All-Star game

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox basketball game. Izno (talk) 02:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox PBA All-Star game with Template:Infobox basketball game.
Useless wrapper template that does not add any features. Same reasoning as here. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox MPBL Finals

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox basketball final. Izno (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox MPBL Finals with Template:Infobox basketball final.
{{Infobox MPBL Finals}} appears to be a slightly modified copy of {{Infobox basketball final}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox basketball series

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox basketball final. Izno (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox basketball series with Template:Infobox basketball final.
Same scope of articles covered. {{Infobox basketball final}} is used far more often. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy/Aeluroscalabotinae

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused taxonomy template. This subfamily does not have an article, it is not mentioned in the source cited on the page, and it is not mentioned on the target species page. This template does not appear to be usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dakota 400

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed as Dakota 400 has the map as part of the infobox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Newcastle Transport light rail station

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A huge navigation template, used on a single page, with a single unique link Newcastle Light Rail. Until the network actually gets more station articles, there is no need for this template. Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Arriva Stoptrein left/36800

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Arriva Stoptrein. Gonnym (talk) 09:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Adelaide left/Dry Creek-Port Adelaide

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Adelaide Metro. Gonnym (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 09:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NYCS Platform Layout 161st Street-Yankee Stadium Station

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused New York City Subway platform layout templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest preview software release/Apache Tomcat

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version templates. If any gets reused during this TfD, remove it from list. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election Results table

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 10. ✗plicit 11:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Born in

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 11. Izno (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Article for protection

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been imported from somewhere else as this is full of red links and created by a user with 10 edits, all of which were reverted. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nonsense templates, probably created out of simple lack of knowledge about WP:RM and WP:RFPP. I had already redirected Template:Article for move to Template:Title notice, which is the closest equivalent we do currently use, and as its template description page contains an explanation of the process. This was reverted to start this TfD here, so obviously I'm in favor of deletion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete under criterion WP:G3 as blatant and obvious misinformation. The content of these templates is entirely fake, there is no "Article for protection" or "Article for move" processes. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 17:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Misleading as that is not how the processes work. they look like the AFD template with 'deletion' changed to the other words and 'afd' modified to reflect the change. 82.132.186.65 (talk) 21:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The user has now been blocked. Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_July_3&oldid=1225333754"