Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 28

< March 27	March 29 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Castewarningtalk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Outdated and fully replaced by another template Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. For context (in case anyone stumbles upon this discussion after the template is deleted), the other template is {{ds/talk notice}} * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Template has been deprecated long enough and can be deleted. Gonnym (talk) 06:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above Rlink2 (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cleanup Indic script

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup Indic script (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Evidently never seen, or else someone would have fixed the double This article * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Pppery and TPH Rlink2 (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unused. Can use {{Cleanup}} instead — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Falcons season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Falcons season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This type of template is, at the best of times, pointless since you could just provide a link directly. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Why only this one and not {{Jaguars season}} and the rest of these NFL season templates? It is a little tricky to find all of them, since they do not have their own category. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template:NFL Year/doc#also has a good list. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Germanic diachronic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Germanic diachronic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, only seems to be intended for one article and seems to contain WP:OR Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this was previously kept at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 28#Template:Germanic diachronic when it was single-use. I seem to have !voted delete then, and still think it should be deleted for basically the same reasons. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Group index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Group index (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused fork of {{Set index article}} Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Masters of Evil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Masters of Evil (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, sprawling template that seems redundant to other ones. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Rlink2 (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Missinginfo-search

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Missinginfo-search (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Seems like a bad idea to dump sources in a template when you can just put them in the article yourself. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Rlink2 (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Morton family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 4. Izno (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Morton_family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mosques in Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mosques in Jordan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, fails WP:NENAN with only three listed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Rlink2 (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music of Assam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Music of Assam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Narimanbekovs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Narimanbekovs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused family tree, too few blue links anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notability editnotice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notability editnotice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Political infoboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Political infoboxes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, only navigates other infoboxes Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. Army User Rank Badges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:U.S. Army User Rank Badges (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, just a list of userboxes. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to Wikipedia:Userboxes/United States Army#Enlisted. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Deadpool film series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deadpool film series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

After removing numerous irrelevant links, there are still problems with this navbox. First and foremost, this navbox is a fork of {{X-Men media}}, which already has almost all of the links found here. It is excessive to list every single song in the two Deadpool films, and Wade Wilson (film character) is a redirect (there is a draft, but it was declined several times). InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (Keep): It's not excessive if this is the template for it. It is two hours old, I will fix the formatting. Patience man. MandoWarrior (talk) 03:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin: MandoWarrior (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this TfD. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Completely unnecessary fork of X-Men media template. Links such as the songs which while appearing on the soundtrack, were not created for the film (Shoop (song) 23 years earlier) and are not notable for their inclusion. Additionally, the template creator has added some WP:OR into the mix with the inclusion of X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which isn't in the same series. Gonnym (talk) 06:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the Mando (template creator) is now blocked as a sock. Gonnym (talk) 10:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very unnecessary duplication of other templates, includes barely relevant links and some non-articles as well. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grammy Award for Best Song Written for Visual Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 4. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Grammy_Award_for_Best_Song_Written_for_Visual_Media (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IRTE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IRTE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused rail template. Gonnym (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IRTNL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IRTNL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused rail template. Gonnym (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East Coast colour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:East Coast colour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused (other than in 1 doc page) rail color template. Gonnym (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GNWR colour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GNWR colour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused (other than in 1 doc page) rail color template. Gonnym (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HeathCon colour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HeathCon colour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused (other than in 2 doc pages) rail color template. Used in a switch case in another template, but also not used from there. Gonnym (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Priorxfd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Priorxfd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Old RfD list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Priorxfd with Template:Old RfD list.
Using "XfD" implies that it should capture all such discussions, but it only captures AfD and MfD (in current practice), and it omits RfD, CfD, TfD. Is it possible to merge the {{Old RfD list}} template here? (It tooke me a while to find it in the first place.) And if done and using the "XfD" text instead of "RfD", my sandbox templating seems to suggest it could capture TfD and CfD use (Special:Diff/1079798244), but I'm no expert. (Is it appropriate to move to {{PriorXfD}} as well for consistent nomenclature?) - 2pou (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The logic of {{Priorxfd}} only works for venues that have discussions on individual subpages. I suppose it could be substantially rewritten to accommodate the by-hand listing of past discussions that is required at RfD, but I don't really see the point in doing that. However, a link to {{Old RfD list}} should definitely be added to the "See also". -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Tamzin. I went ahead and added it to the "see also" section, as suggested. Renerpho (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jaguars season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jaguars season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ravens season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ravens season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).