Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 10

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< October 9 October 11 >

October 10

edit

Template:Eugene de Blaas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 20. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Double underline2

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The documentation points to a better template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Currenthour

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template appears to be redundant to the magic word CURRENTHOUR. It has no transclusions. It is unclear why it was created. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite MTS bus

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded only in one user sandbox. No documentation, incoming links, or categories. Created in 2020. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Calculate

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Five transclusions of this undocumented simple wrapper for #expr. Replace with #expr and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite stackexchange

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, or incoming links from discussions. It is only a month old, so if it is still in development, it could be userfied. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jonesey95. I've cited multiple Math SE posts here on Wikipedia (and a quick text search shows I'm not alone). The Zotero automatic citation format of {{cite website}} omits important details while emphasizing important ones, so I've been writing the citations by hand; the most recent example was this edit. I created that template to try to standardize the Math SE citations I create going forward. Unfortunately, I've experienced something of an editing drought recently, so that the template hasn't seen use.
Certainly, the template shouldn't be deleted. I don't know whether it makes sense to userify it until I next need to cite an SE website, popularize it by adding it to the WP help pages on citation styles, or just leave it as an easter egg in mainspace for anyone seeking to cite that website family. I lean towards the latter choice (obviously; that's what I did choose!), but I don't know what WP practice recommends. Thanks, Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 22:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RE-MV lines

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Nordost, Module:Adjacent stations/Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn, Module:Adjacent stations/Niederbarnimer Eisenbahn, ... Frietjes (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RE-BB lines

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Nordost, Module:Adjacent stations/Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn, Module:Adjacent stations/Niederbarnimer Eisenbahn, ... Frietjes (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RB-MV lines

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Nordost, Module:Adjacent stations/Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn, Module:Adjacent stations/Niederbarnimer Eisenbahn, ... Frietjes (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RB-BB lines

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Nordost, Module:Adjacent stations/Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn, Module:Adjacent stations/Niederbarnimer Eisenbahn, ... Frietjes (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GamesName2

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links from discussions, documentation, or categories. Created in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VR color

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/VR Group Frietjes (talk) 21:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bolivian senators from Beni

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus and delete and move to userspace. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One or two links. Fails navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently working on populating these templates with respective articles, the eventual intention being to fill up all of the "titular" slots (at least a dozen articles for each template). I ask that they remain in place for the time being. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unitl then, I suggest moving these four to a subpage of yours since filling in with the minimum of five links for you is a work in progress. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe these may merit keeping due to the fact they constitute part of a series of templates. As another example, Template:DE-FedRep holds only three links, but it would not make sense to delete it as it's part of a series of templates for all 50 U.S. states. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 06:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it has five links to the respective subject the template was created for. The links to the active members of the delegation but also the articles, United States congressional delegations from Delaware, List of United States senators from Delaware, and List of United States representatives from Delaware. Since you haven't yet created the rest of the articles for members of the delegation as well as the district in the Bolivian parliament, it's best to be userfied, that way you can work on it on your own time. And when it's ready you can move it back to a mainspace template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. In that case, to avoid the hassle of re-creating and re-adding these templates to their respective articles, give me a few days to create List of senators of Beni and List of deputies of Beni. Failing that, feel free to delete them. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 17:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WIP...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS6-2sc

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Does not appear to be needed. Created in 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Burger King COI

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed customization of COI template created in 2017 and apparently not used. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Abdank-varieties

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no links to articles. Created in 2013. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mid Valley City

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox has somehow chugged along linking a whopping two pages since 2014. Not an aid to navigation. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WHL standings templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Substitute and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ARY Film Award Best Director Jury

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only two directors have been given this award that have articles on Wikipedia. No need for this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. The premise of these templates was supposedly to list the chancellor of universities, but this is not required since chancellor in India is not a personal appointment, so there is no reason to list the name to begin with. Muhandes (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AHL (2015-16)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{American Hockey League}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Airtemp-test

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Test template from 2005. Never adopted, no transclusions or documentation or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Art themes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A misguided navbox with no main article. The category Category:Visual arts genres gives a sense of what a proper population of this navbox should be, and it would be far too large. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transmission of ideas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no main article and only three loosely connected articles out of many potential articles linked to this topic (e.g. various forms of written communication, pantomime, etc.). Without a main article, it is not useful to have this navbox to link articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MediaWiki csshide

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2009. Possibly no longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ld2 and siblings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No real transclusions, no documentation, no categories. These templates were kept way back in 2005 as having potential, but they have not been adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kronshtadt aircraft

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No main article for this navbox. Only two links in the body of the navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IFREMER

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox containing only two links to articles in the navbox body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hexcolor-to-hue

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 17. ✗plicit 14:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gurps book

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in three pages. Redundant to {{Cite book}}. It should be straightforward to replace "Gurps" with "Cite" in all transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_10&oldid=1118933133"