Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2014; no substantive edits since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template has been deprecated since 2007 or before, and its current transclusions on a few talk pages do not reflect the template as it existed. I recommend substing a previous working version of this template and then deleting it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Malaysian route boxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These two templates were originally deleted 12 years ago as part of conversions and consolidations with Infobox road. In both cases, these templates are exemplary of the second of WP:TFD#REASONS: "[t]he template is redundant to a better-designed template", in this case, {{infobox road}}, which has been used on Malaysian highway articles now for the past dozen years. Imzadi 1979  22:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Does WP:CSD#G4 still apply after 12 years? –Fredddie 22:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 16. plicit 23:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This subpage is no longer transcluded at Template:Lunar eclipses. Therefore, it should be deleted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).