Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 19

< January 18	January 20 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPTools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Undocumented template proposed in a long VPT thread about some tools being down in 2014. Not needed in template space. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Franchise total episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Television franchise episode count. Izno (talk) 07:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Franchise total episodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Television franchise episode count (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Franchise total episodes with Template:Television franchise episode count.
Two templates that have the same purpose and both used in mainspace. Newer one seems to have the simpler code and more options. Indagate (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Interesting, I didn't know of the existance of the former template. I'll take a look soon to see how their functionalities can be merged; otherwise, I agree that they should be merged. -- Alex_21_TALK 01:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom and pending Alex 21's investigation to the functionality of the older one for its ability to merge into the newer one that he created. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WP1.0Log

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP1.0Log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Created as an experiment in 2010, but apparently never adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I believe there's a bunch more WP1.0 related templates that could use a TFD, probably including the well used {{WP1.0}}. This would probably require quite some research about what exactly the status is for the project (how defunct is it) and how it relates to the WP1.0 bot which has to a large extent gained it's own life as a more general tool. May be worth consulting one of the driving users first as well, many of which seem to still be active or semi-active. --Trialpears (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Massachusetts portals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Massachusetts portals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. It has been gradually trimmed down over the years as portals have been removed, and now it is useless, since all of the Massachusetts-related portals are gone. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GetCountryNameFromDemonym

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GetCountryNameFromDemonym (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Appears to have been superseded by {{GetCountryNameFromAdjective}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CITWF name

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CITWF name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The linked database is no longer accessible. BangJan1999 20:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I have fixed the URL and the instructions. See comment above, though; I am OK if this template is deleted, since this database has minimal information compared to other external film sites. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

delete, low value external site. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CITWF title

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CITWF title (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Database is no longer accessible. BangJan1999 20:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I have updated the URL, but the database has apparently been purged of films from before 2000. The site shows a pop-up window with a message: This website, www.citwf.com, now only contains information on films released 2000-2021. The data for the period 1895-1999 is now at www.firstcenturyofcinema.com. This will be available to the public until 31 July 2021. Thereafter, its accessibility will only be possible via universities, libraries and institutions. Get your library or university to licence Contact citwf@aol.com for full details. It is unclear why we would link to this bare-bones web site at all when better resources exist for external links, so I am OK with delete if the consensus is that this template has no value. Whatever the consensus, someone will need to trim this template out of articles from pre-2000 movies. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

delete, low value external site. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Taiping Heavenly Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Taiping Heavenly Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

[1][2], Base on Atlas of Flags in China. China peace publishing house. ISBN 7801548337., The Flag is incorrect. This is the flag used by Du Wenxiu. Ghren (talk) 05:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This may be the wrong venue. It appears that the nominator is requesting a move rather than deletion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep for now, the article Taiping Heavenly Kingdom uses this flag, so I don't see why this is being discussed here and not on the talk page for Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Computable knowledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 January 31. Primefac (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Computable_knowledge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).