Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 4

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< June 3
June 5 >

June 4

edit

Template:Population of the largest cities of the United States

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused content template in mainspace. Izno (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mountains in North Macedonia

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single mainspace-use template. WP:SUBST and delete. Izno (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:15th CHP Extraordinary Convention

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. I'd guess there's also a standard template for this that would be worth using instead. Izno (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Low-use content template. WP:SUBST and delete. Izno (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: this template is transcluded in three articles and is properly documented and categorized. It does not have any template parameters, however. With so many unused template pages still left to process, is it really a good use of editors' time to review pages like this? Perhaps this is a discussion for the talk page or some other venue rather than an individual TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I am recently processing templates as I come to them while working on MediaWiki talk:Common.css/to do#Template list, not on some other effort to remove low-use templates in the general. Izno (talk) 05:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I don't think it sets a good precedent to delete properly documented and categorized templates that are used in multiple articles. This seems like a borderline case, though, since it is essentially article content and contains no template parameters. As I said above, this sort of template page may merit a wider discussion, along with a possible documented exception for complex code like railway diagrams. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:48, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete after substing. Sometimes having article content in templates is the least bad way to do things, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. Otherwise I don't find the arguments for keeping persuasive; if the mere fact of being categorized with documentation and more than one use were disposative we'd have substantially less TFDs. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 04:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete. I agree with IP. It's not a precedent to delete this--we've certainly deleted more before. As a side note, the reference doesn't work correctly on pages it's transcluded on. SWinxy (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railway line header

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been a few years since a previous TFD, which largely closed as "no consensus - not sure what to convert to". At this point, this template has only 1 remaining use in the mainspace, which I think can/should be converted to whatever template of interest and then we can be done with this one. Izno (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert and delete per nom as the template is now almost unused. Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Society of Exploration Geophysicists

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox contains only one blue wikilink and thus is transcluded on only one page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Naver title

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A external link template that is used for easy linking to Naver Movie when the service is still available however it has since been discontinued from 31 March 2023, hence making this template no longer needed. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beano supporting character

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 16. Primefac (talk) 08:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused s-line templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates. --Gonnym (talk) 06:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of Persian Art

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single use navigation template with current apparent potential for only 4 articles (see WP:NENAN). Suggest deletion. Izno (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:West Virginia Black Bears roster

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article roster template. Subst into article and delete template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WebbrefSV

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Duplicated by Template:Cite web/Swedish, which is better developed and documented. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vostochny Cosmodrome launch sites

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too few links for a navbox. Redundant to Template:R-7 rockets. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UT Arlington Mavericks men's wheelchair basketball team roster

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article table with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Upper Canada Reform Leaders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ukrainian alphabet

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article table with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, a table with essentially the same content appears at Ukrainian alphabet#Alphabet.  —Michael Z. 15:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ToUSDvalues

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Test template created in 2007. Not adopted. Userfy or subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TopicInQuantum-theory

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed in a discussion in 2005, but never adopted or documented. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thoracic plane structures

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. Subst into article and delete template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Logs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template serves as a list of links for 3 or 4 users to Special:Log, and has no other utility, so could be served simply by linking to Special:Log, never mind the links available in Special:Contributions and elsewhere. It has clearly not caught on in the over-15 years it has existed and should simply be deleted. Izno (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mallabhum Infobox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single mainspace use template. WP:SUBST and delete. Izno (talk) 03:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_4&oldid=1160406525"