Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 13

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox based upon a single video game. Already removed all the redirects, links to developer and two characters also appearing in other Marvel properties is not enough for a navbox. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only one blue link. No need for a template. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

single use cricket template. Subst into article and delete template. Gonnym (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst this content into the article and delete the template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • So it looks like the table with this information was originally added to the article Astatine the last day of 2011. In February 2015, this template was created with the table contents, and transcluded into both Astatine and Isotopes of astatine that same day. It was subsequently removed and replaced with a truncated table in the Astatine article on April 1 of 2015, and that content remains in the article to this day. Which brings up an argument for keeping and updating this template: namely, adding functionality to allow for columns to be suppressed so that the content can be updated in a centralized template, while the display is catered to the needs of the transcluding article. As such, I am going to offer a tepid keep and refactor !vote on this matter. VanIsaac, GHTV contWpWS 06:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused icon templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under WP:G7. [deleted by Fastily] (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These unused templates were recently created by a new user from a simple replacement of the icon in the original templates. Most of them are misplaced or poorly categorized and documented. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).