Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss/For Wiktionary

< Wikipedia:Typo Team | moss

This is a special page; putting a Wiktionary link here will cause a word to be ignored by the moss spell checker everywhere it appears (on the assumption it will soon be added to Wiktionary.)

Rejected

edit

(These will need {{not a typo}} and maybe an HTML comment.)

Vocab pages

edit

By article title

edit

0-9

edit

A

edit

For Wiktionary

edit

B

edit

simultaneously instead of alternately.

C

edit
It looks like "niru" has been borrowed (at least in this article) into English, since it's getting an English plural, so "niru" and "nirus" should probably be added to Wiktionary. Though I'm unclear on the precise definition of "niru". -- Beland (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Old English words should definitely be in English Wiktionary, but I also tagged it since Old English pronunciation is different. -- Beland (talk) 01:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

F

edit

H

edit

J

edit
  • 1 - JotForm - wikt:esigning: short for "electronic signing" like email for "electronic mail". (But Wikt has "e-signing".)

O

edit

P

edit

Q

edit

U

edit

V

edit

Y

edit
I think it just needs an entry in Wiktionary, then. -- Beland (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By word

edit

Most common non-English, missing from English Wiktionary

edit

These words are commonly found in English Wikipedia, are present in a non-English Wiktionary, but are missing from English Wiktionary. Word counts are from English Wikipedia. This is a special report from the 2019-08-20 dump.

Mineral words

edit

Several pages with lists of minerals are showing up as some of the pages with the most detected typos. Below is a list of words from these pages. I'm pretty sure some of them are misspelled, so they all require verification. I don't see anything in wikt:Wiktionary:CFI that would exclude these names; some but not all of them are IUPAC systematic. We could also add Wikipedia stubs or redirects as needed if Wiktionary doesn't want them. -- Beland (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beland: Wiktionary does want them. We just haven't gotten around to them, as there are tens of thousands of terms along these lines. BD2412 T 01:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is the extremely rare ones, or terms only ever used on Wikipedia. These are unwanted on Wiktionary. There are an infinite number of possible chemical names, so there are some criteria for inclusion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect or rare mineral words

edit

Needs Wikipedia article instead?

edit

Drugs needing Wikipedia stubs or Wiktionary definitions

edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Typo_Team/moss/For_Wiktionary&oldid=1230308507"