Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 February 24

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< February 23 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 24

edit

05:53:12, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Ifylvu

edit


I need help with referencing of my article. This is my first article on wikipedia and I need to get it right? Can I get a first level review before the main wikipedia review?

Ifylvu (talk) 05:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ifylvu - at first glance the referencing seems ok but you have a problem with inline external links - we do not link words or phrases in an article to external websites. Links within the text are only supposed to go to other Wikipedia articles, see WP:Wikilinks for further information. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifylvu (talk • contribs) 06:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:34:18, 24 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mthalane6

edit


I was told that my new article contains copyrighted information, and could not be approved.Please assist by specifying the copyrighted area so that I can remove it and re submit.

Mthalane6 (talk) 10:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mthalane6 - it would help if we knew which article you were speaking about. According to your talk page, I'm assuming that you're referring to Draft:Soul Brothers S.A. Since the article has now been blanked, it's difficult to ascertain what was copyrighted. You might ask Josve05a on their talk page, but some of the article seemed to be copied directly from THIS SITE. I hope this helps. Onel5969 (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 12:52:31, 24 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Surfacegrafik

edit


What do I have to change in the Biography of Markus Weisbeck? He's a notable Designer, Artist and Professor and all the mentioned sources are verifiable and reliable. Thank you very much for your help and all the best, Florian Feineis surfacegrafik

Surfacegrafik (talk) 12:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Surfacegrafik - I'll try to answer your question. First of all, the entire prose section of the article is completely without references. All 6 of the current citations appear to simply be verification of the existence of certain pieces of the subject's work. There does not appear to be any references as to the subject's notability: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." We would need articles about the subject. And since this is a BLP, it needs a high degree of citation in the prose section. Hope this helps. Onel5969 (talk) 17:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:52:32, 24 February 2015 review of submission by 212.76.225.12

edit


Dear all, I received the information that if I would like to use text from a website, which I created for a project, in the Wikipedia article about the same project, I need to send a Declaration of consent. I chose the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International, but then realized that in the text of this declaration there is the following statement: "I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws."

We, the SlipSafe team, would like to make the content available and usable for everyone, but not for commercial purposes. Therefore, I wanted to ask which license I should use to make sure that the Wikipedia page content about the SlipSafe project cannot be used in a commercial way by everyone.

Best, Eva

212.76.225.12 (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@212.76.225.12: First of all, the CC-By-SA 4.0 license is not backwards compatible with the CC-By-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses that Wikipedia uses for its text, so you would have to release the text under both Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (“CC BY-SA”) and the GNU Free Documentation License (“GFDL”) licenses instead (the Creative Commons 4.0 license is okay for images, but not for text). As to the second point, the Wikipedia Terms of Use allow anyone to "share and reuse our articles and other media under free and open licenses", and therefore it does not allow content that prohibits commercial use. Do note, however, that if you release your text under CC-By-SA 3.0 that anyone using it for a commercial product would have to release the product that incorporates your text under a similar free license. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The 4.0 license is our standard recommendation for images, so it seems you followed one of the links at WP:CONSENT. Please do not follow any links, and instead use the statement on that page. Anon124 (+2) (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 20:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:27:55, 24 February 2015 review of submission by RainmakerUSA

edit

This article was declined due to copyright issues, but the copyright issues were not identified in the notice that the article was declined. Please help me identify the items that had copyright issues, and I can then fix it. Thank you.

RainmakerUSA 16:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@RainmakerUSA: Any text that you copied from any other website or source is assumed to be under copyright. Please rewrite anything in that draft that you didn't write in your own words (such as the text you copied from http://www.livingplaces.com/OK/Tulsa_County/Tulsa_City.html). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:47:55, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Sonypayyappilly

edit


Hi, I had taken these details from Sundarmenon.com please let me know what all to do to resubmit this article. Sonypayyappilly (talk) 19:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have correctly resubmitted that Draft and it is currently awaiting its next review. You may wish to have a look at Wikipedia:VRS to see how to improve its chances of being approved. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:48:11, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Jasonbagley

edit

I'd like to get a little more help understanding why the page I created was rejected. One of the reasons given was "Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable". Falko has had his street art published in over 8 books, which were all referenced in the page. Maybe I'm not referencing them properly? If you compare his page to a similar graffiti artist, Faith47, they have a similar number of publications, although Faith47 does have more videos. Any help would be much appreciated. Jasonbagley (talk) 19:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Jasonbagley: We need references for the information about Falko, not just references to his publications. Pointing to other articles for comparison is usually not a good idea, but if you want to get an idea of what we're looking for, you can check out the good articles in art and architecture. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 03:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:35:08, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Layla-liveliness

edit


I followed the instructions which were given for creating infobox for my article, however the outcome does not seem to be correct and is different from what appears in a normal infobox. please help! Layla-liveliness (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Layla-liveliness: Fixed in this edit. The ending }} was missing. Anon124 (+2) (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 20:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To editor Anon124: Thank you so much for your help. I have also mentioned the names of the developers as well as latest release version, however these don't seem to appear in the infobox either. Could you please guide me on how this could be corrected please?

Layla-liveliness (talk) 20:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:57:13, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Layla-liveliness

edit

I have mentioned the latest release versions, however they do not seem to appear in the infobox when the page is created. How could I overcome this problem? Please help!

Layla-liveliness (talk) 20:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Layla-liveliness. Sorry I didn't find your question earlier. The infobox takes the |developer= and |latest release version= parameters. I've fixed those with this edit; I hope it looks all right. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 03:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:13:14, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Slipvoid

edit

Hey wiki team! I submitted my first Wikipedia article but received a message indicating the article was rejected because the submission was not adequately supported by reliable sources. This confuses me because I took the proper steps to include 9 very credible sources (scientific publications and online magazine articles). Please advise. I'm very excited about this post and will try my best to modify accordingly. Thanks! Slipvoid (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slipvoid, I immediately noticed that the "Early life and education" section has no references at all. Seven of the nine sources cited in the draft are for the Awards list, yet most of the awards are still unsourced. Thus the short answer is; no the nine current sources are not sufficient - they actually tell us very little about Lobe himself. Anything you can't source should be removed - even if "you know it's true". Hope this helps. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:20:29, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Layla-liveliness

edit


Layla-liveliness (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Layla-liveliness. You asked for help but you didn't ask a question. Is there anything we can help you with? — kikichugirl speak up! 07:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:01:00, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Joseph Jensen

edit


Joseph Jensen (talk) 23:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC) I understand that my entry had copyright infringement concerns because I utilized the writing directly off the Flinching Eye Collective's webpage. I got permission from them but did not know how to cite that properly. I have rewritten that portion of my entry keeping the content intact. I just want to make sure that I have properly resubmitted it or if I need to start over with the entire process? Any help will be greatly appreciated.[reply]

I look forward to hearing back from you,

Joseph Jensen

@Joseph Jensen: Even if you got permission, you'd have to prove it somehow - likely by sending an email to permissions wikimedia.org - see WP:Donating copyrighted materials. Also, consider this:
— kikichugirl speak up! 08:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:04:18, 24 February 2015 review of submission by Steven Paul Fisher

edit


Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 23:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have had an entry declined twice in Sandbox and would like to submit a new entry but cant see where to do that.

Steven Paul Fisher

Hi Steven Paul Fisher you can add more sandboxes to your user-space by creating links like this: User:Steven Paul Fisher/Title of new draft. Create the link somewhere convenient such as on your user page, at first the link will be red as the page does not exist yet, click on it and start writing to create the page. The link(s) on your user page will then serve as an easy way for you to keep track of the drafts you are working on. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2015_February_24&oldid=1123770487"