Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 May 16

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< May 15 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 17 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 16

edit

Pandit Ayush Gaur

edit

Pandit Ayush Gaur is an investigative journalist who is mainly known for his abilities in Joint operations and special covert operations. He has headed SITs, special investigation team with big media brands like tv today, inx media, news express, live india and others. He is also an advocate registered with Uttrakhand Highcourt. Ptayushgaur (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ptayushgaur, do you have a question about an Articles for creation draft? Cullen328 (talk) 07:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but your presumed autobiography User:Ptayushgaur/sandbox is poorly written, hagiographic tone, poorly sourced and has no evidence of passing the criteria at WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08:56, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Oskar Meurer

edit

This wikipedia article has een aproved of both of the parents of all the kids and oskar meurer, we are not leaking any of the personal information but names and birth year and ofcourse his story wich all has been aproved by the parents Oskar Meurer (talk) 08:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Oskar Meurer I have requested the supression of the content of this draft for this twice now. Please do not write about yourself further, it is a really bad idea to freely give out so much personal information onto the internet. That is very dangerous. You are not notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article. Please do not write another draft. Qcne (talk) 08:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First, if you are not Oskar, you shouldn't be using his name as your username. Your account should be operated by a single person who does not give access to others.
Approval of the subject or their parents is not required- but this is not social media. This is an encyclopedia that summarizes what independent reliable sources say about topics that are notable as Wikipedia defines the term. Please see your first article.
Please consider very carefully if you want to be doing this at all, see this page for more information. It may be unwise to post that much personal information about Oskar. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its not any more personal information than there is about other people here Oskar Meurer (talk) 09:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Oskar Meurer: The problem is you're writing about minors, which means we have to treat any sort of personally-identifying information as extremely concerning for the sake of their safety. There is a world of difference between writing about a minor and writing about an adult in terms of what should and should not be in the article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:48, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Jessie GYU8

edit

Hello, I'm Jessie GYU8, I uploaded the draft of Asiahorse. And had been rejected. Sorry for taking your time, can you tell me what information can be added to my draft to improve its professionalism and reliability? Because in the process of writing, I gave up some references that can prove its popularity in order to avoid violating the rules of the Wikipedia platform, I would like to confirm with you which links can be introduced into the Wikipedia page? Jessie GYU8 (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection means that it is the end of the road for this draft, at least for now. If you can address the concerns of the reviewers, you need to first appeal to the last reviewer directly.
I see that you claim that you personally created the logo of the company, is that the case? You have also made it available for anyone to use for any purpose with attribution; this means that competitors could hypothetically take your logo and use it for commercial purposes and your company would not be entitled to any money from the commercial use of its own logo. Do you really want to do that? 331dot (talk) 09:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an article about an Iraqi writer a week ago. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it and review it

edit

I have added an article about an Iraqi writer a week ago. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it and review it 37.236.214.18 (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an article about an Iraqi writer a week ago. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it and review it

edit

I have added an article about an Iraqi writer a week ago. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at it and review it Memoplss (talk) 10:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Memoplss Could you link to that article? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but it has not been approved. Draft link Draft:Abdullah Shuaib Memoplss (talk) 11:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Memoplss Did you see the note "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,676 pending submissions waiting for review" ? Qcne (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:13, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Digitalstories

edit

Please help me to improve Dr. Blossom Kochhar's Wikipedia Digitalstories (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Digitalstories: sorry, we don't get involved in editing here at the help desk; that's very much your job. If you have specific questions about the AfC review process, you may ask those here, or general editing questions at the Teahouse or Help desk. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Digitalstories your draft is written inappropriately. Please read WP:NPOV. Every statement must also have an in-line citations. Please read WP:VERIFY and then WP:INTREFVE. Qcne (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:30, 16 May 2024 review of submission by 71.31.70.166

edit

This draft has been declined because the reviewer says it does "not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Just a basic Google search shows that Valentina Gomez is the most-covered 2024 Missouri secretary of state candidate in the race, so this doesn't make sense. What exactly is the Wikipedia definition of the phrase "significant coverage"? 71.31.70.166 (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, we don't go hunting for sources. Either they are cited in the draft (indeed, the draft should be based on sources that meet the WP:GNG standard), or they don't exist as far as the review process is concerned. We have currently nearly 2,700 pending drafts in the system, and don't have the bandwidth to start doing research on all of them.
Secondly, campaign publicity in most cases confers no notability on unelected candidates.
The concept of significant coverage is described at WP:SIGCOV. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the quick response. I will edit this draft article and try again. PeaRidge62 (talk) 11:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember that Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 23:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the information. I am pleased to say that every source in the draft is an independent source, as I have removed all material from the draft that comes from a non-independent source. PeaRidge62 (talk) 23:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:32, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Geniusparmatma Saraswat

edit

i have edited full my article if there is any edit please le me know ill try to all change it with the community guidlines. Geniusparmatma Saraswat (talk) 11:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geniusparmatma Saraswat: this draft has been deleted as promotional.
What is your relationship with the subject? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
its not a promotional i have collected a relevant information about the company then i have posted it if there is any things that have to change please let me know Geniusparmatma Saraswat (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has little interest in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, or what their associates say about them. Wikipedia is almost entirely interested in what people who have no connection with the subject, and who have not been prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable sources. If enough material is cited from independent sources to establish notability, a limited amount of uncontroversial factual information may be added from non-independent sources. ColinFine (talk) 23:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Geniusparmatma Saraswat Your draft has been deleted as blatant advertising 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:35, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Geniusparmatma Saraswat

edit

i have edited full my article if there is any edit please le me know ill try to all change it with the community guidlines. Sorry for Inconvienence. Geniusparmatma Saraswat (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geniusparmatma Saraswat it was pure WP:SPAM so it has been deleted. Qcne (talk) 11:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i have fully edited it according to my relevant information if there is anything to edit please let me know ill try to solve every single deatiled information. Geniusparmatma Saraswat (talk) 13:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was pure spam, @Geniusparmatma Saraswat. Qcne (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:21, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Loleshwarz

edit

We would like to formally request guidance on how we could format the wiki page of Loleshwarz Page for the publication to be released to the general public on the internet legally & smoothly following Wikipedia guidelines & standards. It would be helpful if you provide a sample template to accompany for further assistance on guidance. Loleshwarz (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not Loleshwarz, you cannot use his name as your username and must change it immediately; please do so at Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS.
Your account should only be used by a single person who gives no one else access. If you work for or are otherwise compensated by him, the Terms of Use require you to disclose that, see the paid editing policy. Please also read conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 14:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google cannot be used to source anything, neither can IMDb. The topic does not appear to be in any way notable. Theroadislong (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the draft is hopelessly promotional.
is a versatile artist and entrepreneur acclaimed for his contributions. Which wholly independent commentator has described him as "versatile"? Such evaluative language should never, ever, appear in an article in Wikipedia's voice.
Similarly with "acclaimed", "notable", "renowned", "widespread recognition". Unless you are directly quoting (and attributing) a wholly independent reliable source, all such promotional language should be removed. ColinFine (talk) 23:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:11, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Promanowski

edit

I'm Slavic and Polish. Can you tell me why you have declined my article about Slavic Commonwealth ? What is your background that gives you a superiority to declaim an article about Slavic Commonwealth to Slavic person ? Promanowski (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Promanowski "Do you know who I am" seldom works. You know why it was rejected, as evidenced by your vocal complaint. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Promanowski: Drop the attitude or you will regret it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:MADEUP @Promanowski. Qcne (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So you are saying that claiming that we Slavic people are "made up" people ? Interesting. Adolf Hitler was also claiming that. You are one of his collogues ? (followers) Promanowski (talk) 16:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BATTLEGROUND is not an appropriate behaviour, Promanowski. Pull your horns in and consider starting again, this time with humility and courtesy 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are declining a right to existence to Slavic people on Wikipedia. What's next ? Jews ? Promanowski (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Or you can choose to continue behaving in an unacceptable manner and face the consequences. None of this furthers your ill stated argument, Promanowski. I am thinking the consequences will be reasonably swift 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Promanowski: You are playing with fire by making these sorts of comments within a contentious topic. Drop the attitude or risk being sanctioned. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Promanowski: I wouldn't pursue that 'Adolf Hitler' line of insinuations any further, if I were you, or you may find yourself sanctioned pretty swiftly. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sancionet for what ? For trying to claim my right to existence ? Promanowski (talk) 16:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, for using ethnically-charged and aggressive comments in a topic area that has a history of ethno-political conflicts and thus has more administrator attention and less leeway for misbehaviour than usual. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously ? Who are you people. You denying my right right to existence and at the same time you are threatening me for doing nothing. This is what the nazis did. Promanowski (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Promanowski: The only thing we are denying you is your entitlement to be an ass to everyone who's trying to explain things to you or otherwise telling you that your current behaviour is unacceptable and very likely to get you blocked. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:08, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Jmelki

edit

Hello, I created a page for "Jad Melki" and it was rejected three times. Each time, i addressed the comments noted for the rejection, and each time I get new comments that have nothing to do with the previous comments. In addition, I get emails that seem to be from the reviewers that propose to help me in return for a fee. This is starting to feel like a scam. Can you please help? Jmelki (talk) 23:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, not one of the current citations meets the triple criteria of reliability, independence, and substantial coverage described in the golden rule: most of them are not independent of Melki, and some don't mention him at all.
With no sources that meet those criteria, you have not established that he meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability; and until you have done that, there is no point writing so much as one word of a draft.
Yours is the common, almost universal, experience of people who attempt the challenging task of writing an article when they have not spent time learning the required skills. I always advise new editors to spend several months learning how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles - by the time they understand about verifiability, neutral point of view, independence of sources, and notability, they will have enough knowledge and understanding to read your first article - and also enough knowledge and understanding to see why trying to write an autobiography on Wikipedia is usually a waste of everybody's time. (And yes, I know you've been around since 2009, but with 19 edits in your history, you are a new editor). ColinFine (talk) 02:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jmelki. Scammers watch this noticeboard and other such noticeboards looking for victims. Please read WP:SCAM and ignore any such emails. Cullen328 (talk) 03:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:17, 16 May 2024 review of submission by Maggalomaniac

edit

I would like to add reference sources. Can you help? Maggalomaniac (talk) 23:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maggalomaniac The draft has been rejected and will usually not be considered further. Also, what is your relationship with Altberry65? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 23:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Maggalomaniac: Mind linking the sources you intend to use, right below this reply? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_May_16&oldid=1225050242"