Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Chinese-language entertainment/Assessment

Chinese-language entertainment articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA				2			2
FL				2			2
GA			3	3			6
B		10	12	48		7	77
C	2	3	19	200		38	262
Start		6	34	823		276	1,139
Stub		1	19	631		341	992
List			1	146		42	189
Category					177		177
Disambig					2		2
File					7		7
Project					9		9
Redirect				26	59		85
Template					37		37
Other					11		11
Assessed	2	20	88	1,881	302	704	2,997
Unassessed				1		98	99
Total	2	20	88	1,882	302	802	3,096
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 12,932			Ω = 5.22

                          LE 15/02/20218 A la plaine des cafres

A t ecrire bien de la monde tout reunion plus facial , a film de super heureur a jeux mots trouver mots savoir rire vraiment toujours pour les cheveux. Ah la la plus mots quoi dangeraux . oh, je ne peux pas dire le mots vous nous mieux faire seul a tout. alors , pas problemes nous d aidon aie ? aie ?. Moi, fait pu la monde de les elevents pour vie que de la reunion .Mai , un peu plus gros du le monde. Ok , la malheureure a diffical beaucoup parle vraiments a dos de la monde pareil. impossible le faire fait calme. toujours, greves a tout. mieux l argent de travail pour faim des enfaqnts et ausi de parents a retraite a l autre... qui, chefs de la banque et aussi mistriste donne la pauvre , mai , faut sage de la mistriste donne a la maison ca? fauts pas violents attends un peu quand longtemps enviro 5 ans pour grand la maison de terre chez responsable . a mieux d impots ...? a citification de plat S.I.D.I. au supers legers par mois enviro 300+40=340 mois par 20 ans+ aide logements enviro 250paie 90.00 euros 340+250=590.00 euros/pauvre 90+aide logements 250 250+90=340 par mois 20 ans de l arc bon ou pas bon . demande ? .....qestions qund le.

                             ......signe:dominiquepayet teleph:0693974922

Priority

The purpose of assigning priority is a guideline for the workgroup to get an idea of which article to work on next. The higher priority articles will likely be more extensive than lower priority articles, making it easier for us to tackle. These priorities are based on an artist's influence within the Cantopop,Mandopop or Entertainment industries, whichever it is that they are more active in. Many Cantopop artists sing in Mandarin, but their fanbase is largely entrenched in Hong Kong.

• Top – reserved for the distinct styles of Chinese-language music and media forms (e.g. Chinese Rock, Mandopop, Cantopop) and general articles relating to the Chinese-language entertainment industry.
• High – Artists who are known for songs that are commonly heard in public places and/or Karaoke bars. Album sales are regularly near the top 10 during their active years, and endorsement sales usually get them within the same ranking range. They are few in number, but either own the lion's share of awards, or are shoo-in favourites. The names of these artists will almost always be names that come quickly to someone's mind. Some of these artists may have even made their way to feature-length films and television series or film soundtracks. For artists that debuted in the late 90s or early 2000s, their songs may have also been popularized through viral videos (e.g. the Back Dorm Boys). Finding news articles should never be a problem for these industry behemoths; if they stopped singing long before the Internet age, there should be books on them already. Popularity for these artists may have extended to big-name publications in North America e.g. Time Magazine. These artists are so heavily promoted that their faces are plastered all over television sets, advertisements and what have you. Examples: Jay Chou, S.H.E, Eason Chan, Twins.
• Mid – Artists who have starred in several television series, but never managed to star in a movie. They have released a couple of hit songs or cameoed in popular TV-series', but their popularity are limited. These artists are regulars on television drama soundtracks or side characters, but not popular enough for film. "Mid" artists are also popular in their own right, but don't have as many awards to show for it. Promotion is not as heavy for these artists, so their visibility ends up being a little lower. However, an artist qualifies if he/she has large visibility in commercials/adverts, but releases few albums (5 or fewer for an artist that debuted after 2000, 10 or fewer for an artist that debuted after 1990). News is still easy to find for these artists, but there aren't as many tidbits about their music as there are for rumours. Examples: Justin Lo, Nancy Wu, Mayday, Denise Ho.
• Low – Artists who have been around for a while, but never managed to release a song or act an important enough role that would have elevated their visibility. This priority is usually for newer artists, or artists who released only a few albums but were not very successful. Their names are probably known by listeners who've made the effort to see what there is beyond those who are heavily promoted. They may have also provided appearances in a number of television drama and soundtracks. One-hit wonders with low promotional visibility fall into this category. Artists more often associated with a practice not related to singing also fall into this category (i.e. is known more for the non-singing, as opposed to both singing and whatever else he/she does). Includes all members of bands and groups, unless the singer has made it big after going solo (e.g. Michael Wong). News articles are substantially harder to find. Examples: i.n.g, 2R, Gary Cao, Ella Koon.

Choosing a category: In order for an artist to fall into a category, a maximum of two conditions should not apply. For example, Michael Wong is best known for his karaoke favourite Tong Hua (Fairy Tale), which was parodied on the viral Back Dorm Boys, but he doesn't exactly sweep up awards to the same extent as, say, Lee-Hom Wang.

If an artist has retired/been inactive, either as a soloist or as a group, then priority should be listed as how dominant they were during the years that they were active. For example, F4 is on hiatus, but would be rated as High priority due to the cult following they had as a result of Meteor Garden.

If you still don't know which priority you should put for an artist, use the High-Low rule of thumb. If they're not flailing about in the industry (Low) or ridiculously famous (High) then they're likely Mid. Mid is usually a safe choice.

Requests for assessment

Put requests here.

Aska Yang

Would the team please re-assess the article about Aska Yang? --Katychow (talk) 09:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

 Done Article reassessed as a C-class article. Arsonal (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Lollipop (Taiwanese group)

Could this article please be reassessed by the team? Thanks. --Dessymona (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

G.E.M.

Could you please rate this article because me and some other anons have been doing some hard work editing. Chingster (talk) 19:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

G.E.M.

Please can you give G.E.M. an importance rating 84.13.12.44 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

 Done Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

V Chart Awards

Please do give ratings on this award page. thank you. (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

The Mystic Nine

Please do give ratings on this drama page. thank you. (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Priscilla Chan (singer)

Please do give ratings on this singer page. Thank you!.--Will629 (talk) 02:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Mike Tsang

Could the team review this draft article please? It was created as a translation of the original Chinese wikipedia page on Mike Tsang but was recently moved to Drafts by a reviewer on account of notability. In writing the English translation, I had basically assumed notability of the original Chinese page and reused the majority of the Chinese reference sources, supplemented by new English references where available. There were over 80 references credited before draftification. Since then, to improve notability, I have added even more, but the subject being a Hong Kong singer, the new references are also in Chinese. I would be grateful if the team could have a look and see if it can now pass for the mainspace.Izumi2009 (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)