Wikipedia:WikiProject Fungi/Lichen task force/Assessment

Lichen task force articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Total
FA		2				2
FL		1				1
FM					2	2
GA	1	7	14	29		51
B	1	5	27	31		64
C	3	28	125	190		346
Start	2	37	232	1,017		1,288
Stub		52	695	1,680		2,427
List		1	1	26		28
Category					511	511
File					3	3
Portal					1	1
Project					23	23
Redirect		2	1	3	1,299	1,305
Template				1	757	758
NA					1	1
Assessed	7	135	1,095	2,977	2,597	6,811
Total	7	135	1,095	2,977	2,597	6,811
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 22,680			Ω = 5.43

Lichen/Potential sources (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Gerhard Rambold (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

Cetraria (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Cetraria australiensis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Coelocaulon australiense (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Arthoniactis ostrearum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Lecanactis ostrearum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Xanthoparmelia africana (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

To assess articles follow instructions at {{WikiProject Fungi}}.
The table above will be automatically updated daily. To run the bot manually see here, enter "Lichen task force", and click submit. See User:WP 1.0 bot/Web/FAQ and Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot for further details.