Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2014/November

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting | Proposals | Archive | 2014
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Buttons to Push Buttons in topic Proposals, November 2014


Proposals, November 2014

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Stubs for moth family Erebidae and its subfamilies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Thousands of species of moths from the families Noctuidae, Arctiidae, Lymantriidae, and Micronoctuidae were reclassified by zoologists into the family Erebidae. Wikipedia's species pages are being updated, and many are stubs with various taxon stubs like Herminiinae-stub. The following stub changes or creations are needed to fit the new classification. Many of these categories already have hundreds of species pages, and the rest soon will.

Under Noctuoidea:

Under Erebidae:

Treichar (talk) 02:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Since I saw no objection, and since this was based on changes in the scientific classification, I went ahead and moved or created these templates and categories as necessary. For now, all of the subfamilies have at least a template. Please change the stub tag as you are changing the categories on the affected articles. Dawynn (talk) 13:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Tortricinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose splitting the oversized Tortricinae stub category at the Tribe and genus level. Numbers provided by recent CatScan:

Dawynn (talk) 19:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Defunct United Kingdom intelligence agencies stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus.
Stale, nominator never returned. Personally I would suggest {{UK-intel-stub}} would make for a better first fork, but regardless anyone should feel free to refile should they so desire Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 22:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


I am proposing the creation of the Defunct United Kingdom intelligence agencies stub template, to be named {{UK-defunct-intel-stub}} as there are many articles on defunct British intelligence agencies that I have considered stubs, including MI7, MI9, MI10, MI11 and so on. The stub should be a subcategory of the Category:United Kingdom government stubs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by William1835 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 21 November 2014‎

@William1835: How many articles would qualify for this? Are there any similar stub templates or categories for other countries that we could use for comparison? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2014/November&oldid=989405026"