 WikiProject Turkey
Departments
Infoboxes
Other templates
Turkey work groups
Project's statistics
This list is generated automatically every night around 10 PM EST; view full worklist
| Turkey articles by quality and importance
|
| Quality
|
Importance
|
| Top
|
High
|
Mid
|
Low
|
NA
|
???
|
Total
|
 FA
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
|
13
|
| FL
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
 A
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
 GA
|
|
9
|
37
|
72
|
|
7
|
125
|
| B
|
14
|
72
|
246
|
239
|
|
72
|
643
|
| C
|
23
|
79
|
350
|
785
|
|
276
|
1,513
|
| Start
|
8
|
115
|
2,083
|
4,791
|
|
1,970
|
8,967
|
| Stub
|
|
11
|
504
|
20,482
|
1
|
7,071
|
28,069
|
| List
|
1
|
15
|
302
|
367
|
33
|
359
|
1,077
|
| Category
|
|
|
3
|
131
|
13,043
|
|
13,177
|
| Disambig
|
|
|
2
|
7
|
581
|
1
|
591
|
| File
|
|
|
|
2
|
183
|
|
185
|
| Portal
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
| Project
|
2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
15
|
| Redirect
|
|
13
|
63
|
297
|
852
|
|
1,225
|
| Template
|
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1,340
|
|
1,348
|
| NA
|
|
|
|
8
|
8
|
|
16
|
| Other
|
|
|
|
1
|
86
|
|
87
|
| Assessed
|
50
|
319
|
3,599
|
27,194
|
16,159
|
9,756
|
57,077
|
| Unassessed
|
|
|
1
|
14
|
1
|
1,479
|
1,495
|
| Total
|
50
|
319
|
3,600
|
27,208
|
16,160
|
11,235
|
58,572
|
| WikiWork factors (?)
|
ω = 221,542
|
Ω = 5.63
|
WikiProject Turkey
Article Improvement Drives
edit
- There is a need for standardisation of same kind of articles; i.e. City articles have many different layouts, Biographies, Geographic places, cuisine related, music related also.
- We must have a definite layout for Provinces, another one for cities, another one for mountains, another one for ministries and so on.
- A sample Layout for Provinces; Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Current tasks/layout/province
- Comments and ideas needed. .
Tagging the talk pages of articles with {{WPTR}} puts them in project scope and identifies them via various categories to the project.
- New articles - New articles that may be relevant to WikiProject Turkey should be reviewed daily and any new articles that are in project scope should be tagged.
- Turkey-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to Turkey. These should be brought into project scope.
- Data - Category:Turkey stubs
- Frequency - Quarterly
- Taskforce
- Task - All the articles in this category should have {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}}
- Result - Turkey-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
- Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
- Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)
- Turkey-cuisine-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to cuisine of Turkey. These should be brought into project scope and also to the attention of Food and Drink Project
- Data - Category:Turkish cuisine stubs
- Frequency - Quarterly
- Taskforce
- Task - All the articles in this category should have {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}} {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}
- Result - Turkey-cuisine-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, and made known to Food and Drink project, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
- Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
- Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)
- Needed articles
- Please tag any redlink articles talk page with ;{{WPTR}} , "class=Needed" . These links will be automatically listed under the category in above link.
Hi everybody,
could someone take a look at this little problem here? The thing is that some statistics about Muslim/Turkish(?) casualties are wrongly cited from sources, but now two editors are simply removing the category of Muslim casualties altogether, leaving only Greek and Armenian figures. I am not sure, but I feel this might even be done on purpose, the editors do not engage in discussion, so some help would be appreciated. Thank you, 82.217.116.224 (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I managed to get a reprieve for this Turkish article into draftspace about a Turkish paper pulp company called MOPAK; however, I could not find enough RS to save it properly (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOPAK). There is very little on it in English websites. I was wondering if there are any Turkish editors who could take a look at it in draftspace and see if they can find some Turkish references that would help it meet WP:GNG? Otherwise, it will get deleted in draftspace. Or perhaps, Turkish editors might not consider it worth saving? Britishfinance (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Publicising this - Talk:Good Party#Political position - Rfc here, per WP:RFCTP. It really needs input from more editors. Please place your views on the linked talk page. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|
