Wikipedia talk:Editorial oversight and control

Title

Title: Editorial control process? Editorial oversight and control? FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 02:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

About Larry Sanger's phrase

"Given enough eyeballs, all errors are shallow" - ????

A mob of several thousand monkeys have a lot of eyeballs, too.

--SciCorrector (talk) 13:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Questionable article name

My Websters gives the definition of oversight that is inappropriate to this page name before the appropriate one:

oversight |ˈōvərˌsīt|

noun

1 an unintentional failure to notice or do something :

he said his failure to pay for the tickets was an oversight | was the mistake due to oversight?

2 the action of overseeing something :

effective oversight of the financial reporting process.

And that was my first reaction when I saw it in the section of WP:About pointing here. As there is such a straightforward and unambiguous replacement, supervision with exactly the same roots, would it not be more auspicious to replace the darn word in the page name and all things leading here?

-- Trev M  ~  12:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Flagged revisions

There is a sentence which reads "The control known as flagged revisions is being rolled out as of 2007". Is it still being rolled out? Has the roll-out stalled or has the rollout been completed? Could someone in the know take a look at this? I am very unfamiliar with this whole area of quality management within WP so don't want to offer a change myself. Thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)