Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/August 26

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Firefangledfeathers in topic 2023 notes
Today's featured article for August 26, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 26, 2025
Picture of the day for August 26, 2025

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Concerning the entry about the second Battle of Bull Run: No, the battle did not begin today, August 26. It began on August 28, 1862, just like the wikipedia article on Second Bull Run says. L. Thomas W. (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC) L. Thomas W.Reply


Donoghue_v_Stevenson

edit

This case, as the article says quite clearly, was a Scots law case, not English law. However, as the House of Lords is the ultimate court for both Scottish and English civil law, the precedent extended to English law, also. Therefore, to be accurate, On this day should say

launch one of the landmark civil action cases in British Common Law.--ML5 (talk) 13:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposal

edit
 

(bolded article is a good article) Cambalachero (talk) 22:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

2012 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 04:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

2013 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 04:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Heroes' Day and Herero Day in Namibia

edit

Just a note that this is an unusual case: Both are on the same day, August 26, and Heroes' Day commemorates an event (Battle at Omugulugwombashe) whose date was intentionally chosen to be the same anniversary that Herero Day celebrates. References are in the article. --Pgallert (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

2014 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 09:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

2015 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 07:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

2016 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 08:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested edit

edit

One of the anniversaries reads as follows:

2008 – More than a week after a ceasefire was reached in the Russo-Georgian War, Russia unilaterally recognized the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

It is needless to say that a country unilaterally recognized another country since the recognition of one state to another is an attribute of every sovereign state to decide it without any foreign interference and does not need to consult another country or other countries for this, hence no more sides or parties are needed to do so. If Abhazia had declared its independence unilaterally, that's a different tale, since international law provides in which situations a state may declare its independence, but it can not prohibit or ban if one country wants to recognize another country, because as I said before, it is an attribute of a sovereign state to decide whether it does or does not recognized any random nation.

I propose to delete that word for the reasons given above, in order to read: "2008 – More than a week after a ceasefire was reached in the Russo-Georgian War, Russia recognized the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia." Nika de Hitch (talk) 10:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Not done Hi Nika de Hitch, you've used the edit request template incorrectly. This template is for users with a conflict of interest in editing the article and I've therefore removed the template as this isn't applicable in this case. As a side note, you could remove the word yourself as there have been no objections or further discussion since this edit request was made in August. st170etalk 14:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

2017 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 21:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

While Hey Jude appeared in 2017, please can it also appear in 2018, as it will be the 50th anniversary of its release. Thanks. Fish+Karate 11:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Harra incident

edit

Hi Howcheng. Did you see my suggestion? Could I know why you removed it from the page? Regards. --Mhhossein talk 12:56, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

I just saw your comment on my talk page, thanks for your clarifications. --Mhhossein talk 13:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

2018 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 17:30, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

2019 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 15:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

2020 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 18:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

2021 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 07:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

2022 notes

edit

howcheng {chat} 17:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

2023 notes

edit

There was a discussion at WP:ERRORS about the "Hey Jude" item, copied below. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC) Reply

Extended content
  • 1968The Beatles released "Hey Jude", which became the then-longest single to top the UK charts.
Here we go again. Is this the UK Wikipedia?
According to our "Hey Jude" article:
"Hey Jude" was a number-one hit in many countries around the world and became the year's top-selling single in the UK, the US, Australia and Canada. Its nine-week run at number one on the Billboard Hot 100 tied the all-time record in 1968 for the longest run at the top of the US charts, a record it held for nine years.
Suggest we include at least the U.S., along with UK, as the two largest relevant markets, and possibly also other English-speaking countries. – Sca (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
If it's true that it was the longest single to top the US charts, I'd consider adding that, but the article only mentions the UK charts. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Firefangledfeathers and Sca: How about describing it as a global hit, so drawing the international aspect out of the narrower national one? SN54129 13:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm neutral on that. If others like it, I'm ok with anyone making the switch. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
For our audience, U.S. and UK seem more relevant -- possibly with the addition "and in many other countries" or words to that effect. (It was also popular in some non-Anglosphere countries, such as [West] Germany, France, the Netherlands, etc.) -- Sca (talk) 16:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
So, six hours later, we're still saying it was a hit only in the UK. Rule Britannia? Good grief!Sca (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
It doesn't say it was only a hit in the UK. It does say it became the then-longest single to top the UK charts, where "longest" refers to its seven-minute length. That's more interesting than simply being a "hit". The blurb reflects the article, which only mentions (and references) the length record for the UK charts. I don't see what the problem is. Bazza (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The problem is this: About 62 percent of the world's speakers of English as a first language reside in the U.S., where Hey Jude also was a huge hit. I myself remember it very well.
The present blurb doesn't say "only," but it certainly implies it by not mentioning any other relevant English-speaking audiences, notably the largest one. English Wiki is not his Britannic Majesty's Wikipedia, it's Wikipedia for speakers of the English language, of which this I am one. As my 'Babel' user box says, "This user is a native speaker of the English language." -- Sca (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was sure the complaint about this set was going to be that it was Americentric, given there are two US hooks plus a US bio and holiday. But no, we get Anglocentric! ERRORS, man. Vaticidalprophet 20:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Baloney. -- Sca (talk) 20:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Are there sources to say that the song set the same record in other countries? Can they be added to the article? Until that's done, this is a non-starter. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Excuses, excuses. But there's no editorial excuse for the blatant one-sidedness of the existing blurb.
Unfair and disappointing. -- Sca (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply