Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Horror/Sources

Reliable sources?

Hello, Would anyone also consider that both the following sites can be considered reliable and quality sources:

1. Scared Stiff Reviews. See their About Us and Team
2. the other is Moria Reviews

Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

• @Mushy Yank: Sadly to me it doesn't seem like either site has any editorial oversight, which is a near universal demand for a site to be considered reliable.★Trekker (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

  Thanks@StarTrekker:! What about considering the editorial team of Scared Stiff Reviews as experts on their subject? The staff at Moira Reviews are annoyingly discreet about who they are.... -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

  @Mushy Yank: I am not overly familiar with the two so I can not say, I would recoment starting a discussion on the main horror project to get more input.★Trekker (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

  Done! (here) Thanks again.@StarTrekker -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

CHUD.com

@StarTrekker and ReaderofthePack: Any reason why this now-defunct website is excluded from the list despite having deemed it reliable in a now-archived, three-year-old discussion? What makes it truly reliable, anyhow? Because I chanced upon a retrospective review from this site that I intend to cite in an article I'm improving; only problem is that neither WP:FILM/R nor this project seem to honor it. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Offhand I can't remember anything as far as it being removed. Maybe it was discussed at a deletion discussion and someone brought up something. I say go ahead and use it. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)