Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies/Task forces/Person

Input requested

A situation has come up regarding the spelling of one of Oscar Wilde's middle names. Any and all input here Talk:Oscar Wilde would be appreciated. Thanks. MarnetteD|Talk 18:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Elliot Page § Former relationships and other recent revelations

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elliot Page § Former relationships and other recent revelations. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:VJ Andy#Requested move 28 March 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:VJ Andy#Requested move 28 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft biography for David Medina (political advisor)

Hello! On behalf of the subject, I have submitted Draft:David Medina (political advisor) for editor review at Articles for Creation as part of my work at Beutler Ink. Sharing a notice here in case any WikiProject LGBT studies participants are interested in taking a look. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Tony Leondis

Apologies if this talkpage is unwatched; not sure where else to bring this. Found this article Tony Leondis in the course of normal gnoming. The § Personal life section consists wholly of a single sourced statement stating the subject is gay. Is there a better place for that factoid, or a better way to handle it? I'd throw it in the lead, but I'm not sure it's WP:DUE; or I'd get rid of it, but it might be necessary to establish categorisation in LGBT categories (which is already done). Please edit as deemed best. Folly Mox (talk) 14:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

The personal life section is the typical norm for factoids like this to add sourcing for such facts.

Other facts that also go there typically are facts like married to or personal pronouns and such that the person has disclosed about them. Which yes as you noted, on BLP is somewhat important to have sourced in the article to support the categorization as any unsourced information is subject to removal on BLPs.

In this particular case, you could expand the factoid with a small more prose-like sentence based on the ref source saying something like "In an interview about the Emoji movie, Leondis talked about his experience of growing up gay and connecting with the character Gene about feeling different in the world growing up." if that is what you're trying to solve. Raladic (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I have added another fact to keep it from seeming such a lonely section. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)