Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Disambiguation page for Ciudad Universitaria

Hola a todos! Since people seem to be shy, I'll start with something. Is it possible that somebody could create a disambiguation page for Ciudad Universitaria? (I don't know how to do it) That link takes you directly to the UNAM's main campus. Nothing wrong with the UNAM but we also have our own Ciudad Universitaria de Caracas( I started the article some time ago and I'm still working on it) which is a UNESCO World Cultural Heritage and therefore, people should be able to find it fairly easy...Don't you think? (03:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC))Caracas1830

Hola, Caracas. Here's an example of how to do a disambiguation page: Tourette. In this case, it would involve renaming and moving the contents of the original article, Ciudad Universitaria, using that page for the disambiguation which would direct towards the Mexico page and the Caracas page. Since there are only two pages to disambiguate, I'm not sure disambiguation is the best way to go ? Perhaps it would be better in this case to add a line to the top of the Ciudad Universitaria article, similar to the line at the top of Tourette syndrome, which refers people to Ciudad Universitaria de Caracas. I'll do that for now, but if you really want a disambiguation page, I think I know how to do it now. Sandy 14:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Sandy! Somehow I didn't think of adding a line(?!) the simpler the better. I think that is the best solution (Caracas1830 18:57, 17 June 2006 (UTC))

Standardized naming conventions in Presidents

See Talk:List of Presidents of Venezuela. Shouldn't we change the presidential names in all lists and templates to either both surnames, or one surname ? They are inconsistent throughout the presidential lists. My suggestion is that the List of Presidents of Venezuela should contain both surnames for all presidents, while the template at the bottom of that page should contain only one surname, for brevity. Sandy 14:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Data for vote tally tables

I noticed that the vote tally tables used in several articles (like Hugo Chávez) are not referenced and sourced. I found the data for one of them, and included the reference in the template, Template:ChavezElections2000. Can anyone help locate a reference for the vote tallies in Template:ChavezElections2004, Template:ChavezElections1999, and Template:ChavezElections1998 ? Thanks! Sandy 14:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Done. Sandy 13:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikify Orlando Urdaneta

Can anyone wikify Orlando Urdaneta? Seems he called for the assassination of Chavez, and non-Venezuelans might not know who he is. Sandy 19:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I started a small biography today (Caracas1830 15:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC))

Thanks !! Sandy 16:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Sync Bolivarian Missions with the Missions template

The Bolivarian Missions template does not agree with the article.

• For consistency, they should be in the same order
• The template does not include Florentino, Arbol, and Ciencia
• The article does not include Plan Bolivar 2000 and Piar

Sandy 13:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

i want to participate in this project

i want to participate in this project, i made a lot of articles related to venezuela, music, musicians, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GJRFMorelligu (talk • contribs) 14:31, 5 July 2006 UTC

Hola ! Please remember to sign your talk page entries with four tildes (~), so we'll know who made the comment. Bienvenido! This page contains a list of unfinished projects and problems to resolve. Sandy 15:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

WP:VRNB

Howdy. I created the regional notice board for the project. Actually, I made it as a sort of extension, to display news and updates. Go to: Wikipedia:Venezuela-related regional notice board.

Regards. --Alex Coiro 01:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Expand bio on Rosales

Can anyone expand the bio on Manuel Rosales, per his CV?] Sandy 12:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Update cabinet

Can anyone update the Cabinet of Hugo Chávez? I'm not sure if any of it is up to date. [1]. Sandy 12:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

List of Presidents of Venezuela

We have a talk page dilemma about who to include in the succession of Presidents. Can others help out here ? Sandy 01:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Project directory

Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 16:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Template

I have created a template called WP_Venezuela so that users can see articles that belong to the project (which should be all Venezuela-related entries). It looks like this:

I already put it in the talk pages of around 10 articles, but I would appreciate it if someone could help to put it everywhere else. Suggestions are welcomed of course.--enano ^(Talk) 23:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

El Show de Renny

Does anyone can help me to enlarge the article I started about El Show de Renny?

Wikipedia Day Awards

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 20:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

New article and recognized content bots

If anyone is interested User:AlexNewArtBot is able to generate a list of new articles on a daily basis, which does make it easier to spot and tag new articles as well as find possible project participants who are already working on related material. Also, User:JL-Bot is available to automate the creation and maintenance of a recognized content page. I thought those might help since that same material is already being updated manually on the project page. -Optigan13 (talk) 19:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't speak "bot"; what would people need to do? Thanks, Optigan! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Neither do I (although I'm working on it), but I think you might want to contact the bot operator for the new article bot. It looks like that one requires a list of regular expressions to work correctly. I've created Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Recognized content so the bot can run and people can take a look to see if they want it on a regular basis. If not, just tag it for housekeeping (csd#g6) deletion. -Optigan13 (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Optigan .. I'll catch up on this when I can, but it's over my head :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I've added a Venezuela entry to NewArtBot; but the rules are a bit tricky (regexp) and need developing. They can be found here: User:AlexNewArtBot/Venezuela. The rules instructions are at User:AlexNewArtBot#Compile_the_rules. If it works, then the next time the bot runs, Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/new articles should get content in it. Rd232 ^talk 20:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I've also made a mess of adding the new template to the main page here, but I don't know how to fix it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

It looks like it's something to do with the table for the invite displaying incorrectly. When I pull it out of that table in preview it shows correctly with and without the header parameter. -Optigan13 (talk) 21:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it's the subst: ing, not the table. Rd232 ^talk 21:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Project tags

I'm finding numerous Venezuelan articles that don't have the talk page tagged with {{WP Venezuela}}, in case anyone wants to work on those. It would help to go through Category:Venezuela stubs to see if all talk pages have a Project template. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:AutoWikiBrowser and the User:Kingbotk/Plugin allows somebody to knock out tagging those pages fairly quickly (assuming they have a windows computer). But you might want to consider a Wikipedia:Bot requests to have one of the project tagging bots go through a larger list or category of pages to tag more quickly and with less effort. Also, it is a bit odd to have both {{WikiProject Venezuela}} and {{WikiProject South America|venezuela=yes}} as tagging options. Looking at the other South American projects it might be better to look at centralizing more of the work at Wikipedia:WikiProject South America to not spread a limited number of participants so thin. I tagged five pages with the Venezuela tag, and noticed the line "is a new concept in communications" in ACN – Agencia Carabobeña de Noticias seems a bit overly promotional, but I'm not sure how to reword that. -Optigan13 (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I've modified {{WikiProject Venezuela}} from Category:WikiProject Venezuela articles to Category:Venezuela articles which is what {{WikiProject South America|venezuela=yes}} was placing pages into, the Venezuela tag was on approximately 784 pages, and only 48 using the South America tag. It is a bit odd to me to have two different banners, and I think based on the number active participants here and the other South American projects, it might be better to merge this and the other projects as task forces of Southern California, but I'll leave that to the Venezuela project members to decide here. -Optigan13 (talk) 04:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Venezuela-related regional notice board

(beginning of this thread moved to Wikipedia:Venezuela-related regional notice board)

Sandy, this is now the 8th thread you've put here which is very article-specific. If the threads aren't really achieving more involvement with those articles, all it does is clutter this page. The summary threads "BLPs needing work" / "Articles needing attention" are then a better approach, I think. Or even using the project page itself somehow. Rd232 ^talk 07:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Got it (going to sleep now). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Wait, there's Wikipedia:Venezuela-related regional notice board. That might be a better place, and should be part of the Resuscitation Plan. Rd232 ^talk 07:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Ugh. Another thing to look at and do! Tomorrow ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

If you figure out how to use that board while I'm getting my beauty sleep, feel free to move anything from here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Project assessments

I've posted the WP 1.0 Assessment chart for Venezuela at the top of this page; WP Venezuela has over 500 unassessed articles, and many articles whose talk pages haven't been tagged with {{WP Venezuela}} (which should include the |class= and |importance= parameters), hence won't show up in the chart, which is fed by the Project tag. A description of article assessment is here. For comparison, here is the assessment chart from another project. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Rd, thanks for assessing some! It takes a while for the bot to update the assessment chart, but by looking at the categories at the bottom of the talk page, you can see assessment is assigning the article to the correct cat. Next, we need to get a bot on board to tag all of these articles with {{WP Venezuela}}. I don't speak bot, so hopefully someone will pick up on that. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bot requests has lots of experience with that. Basically we need to collate a list of categories to tag, checking any subcats should be tagged too; see the last para of the intro at Wikipedia:Bot requests. We can collate a list below, with articles and categories in separate lists. Categories would be tagged, I guess, {{WP Venezuela|class=category}} and articles {{WP Venezuela|class=|importance=}}. Articles with stub templates can be automatically categorised stub class, so they would be given {{WP Venezuela|class=|auto=stub|importance=}}. Rd232 ^talk 00:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, we can probably save ourselves work by noticing that most relevant categories have "Venezuela" in the name. So a bot can go through Category:Venezuela recursively, and tag everything it finds in any subcategory with "Venezuela" in the name (and log any categories it finds that don't, for manual processing or checking for a second run). if that sounds OK I can put in a request. Rd232 ^talk 01:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm confused (not only do I not speak bot, I refuse to learn the language :) Why can't we just ask them to through all of Category:Venezuela and add the tag to all articles in that cat and all sub-cats? Why do we need to tell them anything else?? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You can have them tag everything in the category, but having a list is better to make sure there's no unexpected issues with pages in categories that shouldn't be there. You should also let whichever them know if you have any criteria for auto-importance setting so you don't have to revisit the tagging for that issue, and the bot doesn't have to make two runs. I pulled a list of pages using WP:AWB recursed to two levels and posted it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela/Assessment. There are 2,250 pages in there after removing duplicates. Take a look at that and see if there is anything that shouldn't be showing up in Venezuela categories. If it looks ok you can have a bot go through that list to tag and assess. I normally use AnomieBot, but he's on wikibreak, so you might want to try User:Xenobot Mk V (or the other two in Category:Autoassessment bots). The bot's page has a fairly straightforward description on what's needed, as well as a description for how to tag for quality at User:Xenobot Mk V/process, as well as a link there on how to provide importance settings if you wish. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Goodness-- thanks: what a lot of work !! I have to pr/ar FAC this weekend, so probably won't be able to look at this til Monday. Then I guess I have to learn bot-speak! Maybe Rd will get to some of this before I do ... thank you for everything ! (2500 pages, and we've only tagged 500 of them ? No wonder the Project died ... ) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I've created a request: User_talk:Xenobot_Mk_V/requests#WP:VEN Rd232 ^talk 15:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

• This task is running now... Project members should check Category:Automatically assessed Venezuela articles and Category:Automatically prioritized Venezuela articles to ensure that both the class and importance rating being set is appropriate. Once it is either affirmed or changed, the |auto=??? and |autoi=yes parameters should be removed. –xeno^talk 19:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela/Assessment for summary. Rd232 ^talk 11:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

and Category:Unassessed Venezuela articles for articles needing assessment. Rd232 ^talk 13:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Categorisation

The recent tagging run has brought up the point that in quite a few cases there is overcategorisation (WP:OVERCAT) going on. There are many categories with a handful of members, and in some cases there are obvious omissions, and the problem can be fixed by creating articles. In other cases, the categories are just too specific and likely never to be satisfactorily filled. These categories should be emptied (member articles recategorised more broadly, if necessary creating the broader category), and the empty category then tagged {{db-empty}}. If in doubt about a particular case, discuss it here or at WP:VRNB. There's also a WikiProject Categories which might be appealed to for help. Rd232 ^talk 17:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced living people articles bot

User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Archive 1/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you.

Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Archive 1/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.

There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.

If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 23:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope. There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 32,665 as of May 16. A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.

Your Project's list can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Unreferenced BLPs. As of May 17 you have approximately 49 articles to be referenced, a 3.9% reduction from last week. The list of all other WikiProject UBLPs can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects.

Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 17:38, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Citation Style

Hey, I know a bunch of people on the Hugo Chavez page have been wondering about reference format and what style of citation should be used. Let the debate begin ... --Schwindtd (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Personally I prefer APA, but any common standard is fine really. Rd232 ^talk 20:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

We should use the Wikipedia one. It is standard across most high-quality articles here, and is available through pre-made templates and automated through the citation bot. Awickert (talk) 05:43, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

What's "the Wikipedia one"? Rd232 ^talk 21:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

[Sorry for being so late!] They're the ones found at Wikipedia:Citation_templates. They are handy, there are automated forms to use them (click "cite" in the top bar above the edit window), and User:Citation_bot can fill in full citations in this format based only on a doi or isbn. Awickert (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I can tell that this is not really getting too far, because not many people are actually getting involved. My opinion is that citation templates (I think that's the "wikipedia one")are kind of annoying (I don't actually know how to use them or many other templates yet.) I encourage, therefore, the adoption of MLA style. You can have Son of Citation Machine format it for you very easily and quickly and then paste it into the ref's. The site has other styles like APA but all that matters is a uniform standard and User:Rd232 has stated that "any common standard is fine really." So if anyone vehemently disagrees comment on this talk page. And soon. I would like to format the cites according to some standard soon, because there are a lot of them. Thanks! --Schwindtd (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Since no one has opposed anything commented here. I believe that the time has come to overhaul the references on Chavez. I will begin to reformat ALL the citations to a new standard. If you would like to see an example of the citation style I will use please see Why Socialism?'s references. Thanks!--Schwindtd (talk) 20:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

• As I pointed out on the talk page, I prefer templates because they can be parsed by automated computer tools, they are simpler to use, they automatically deal with all of the punctuation/formatting/etc. so that people don't have to learn this themselves. The only argument I've heard against them is that they are "complicated", which is untrue. They are actually simpler than doing proper citations manually. You don't have to learn all of the rules for formatting, punctuation, etc. -- you just put the title in the title= field, the author in the author= field, etc. ... what is complicated about that? If people can include a link and fill out an article issue template, then citation templates aren't any more difficult than those. Anyhow, that's my 2 cents on the matter. Personally I don't care if somebody wants to go through and convert them all, but I plan to continue using citation templates, unless I am forced to stop, because I don't feel like having to deal with all of the formatting manually. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 03:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
  • You may be used to them, but they are not "simpler to use"; and what's complicated about them is you need to know the fieldnames, plus the result is much harder to scan and looks offputtingly like programming source code. They make wikitext much harder to read, especially if there are a lot - check out this old version of Taner Akcam - try editing the second section!! You'll see why it took me two hours to convert to list-defined references which at least hides the hard-to-read mess at the end of the article. The "you don't need to learn the rules" argument doesn't hold water - it's easy enough to follow existing styles, within the article or without; whilst you do need to learn the fieldnames! They also create a harmful sense of "this must be stylistically exactly right" which puts potential editors off. Consistency of style is vastly over-rated anyway (as long as the info is there, who cares?). We have much more important problems than consistency of style, notably keeping articles up-to-date: and citation templates make articles less likely to be updated because they undoubtedly put casual editors off editing because after clicking on Edit the wikitext is that much scarier and harder to read. In sum, I think citation templates are actively harmful and should be discouraged wherever possible. Rd232 ^talk 08:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
    • You make a good point as far as the Wikitext being potentially more difficult to read -- source code makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, but I guess for a new editor, it could make things look more difficult than they really are, and prevent them from improving the article. -- 15:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• I offer up my own style (called "Schwindt Style") to be used for the article. To see how cites would be formatted please see User:Schwindtd under section titled Citation Style I Use. Let me know how this cite style feels. It basically combines MLA and citation templates and it isn't too difficult. And it looks very handsome, if I say so myself. Thanks! --Schwindtd (talk) 20:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Universidad Nacional Experimental de la Seguridad

Has anybody started an article on Universidad Nacional Experimental de la Seguridad [2] yet? This NYT article briefly mentions it. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

"Boy with leaking boot" statue in Caracas?

Hallo, in the article The Boy with the Leaking Boot it's mentioned (with a source[3]) that there is a statue of this type in Caracas. Does anyone know anything about it? Can you point me to any source, image, further information? I'm trying to get the article to Good Article status and would like to expand on this, one of the minority of non-USA statues. Thanks in advance for any help! PamD (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I can't find any indications of reliability at http://www.wawarsing.net/ , which would make it hard to get that article to GA status. I will ask friends if anyone knows of this statue in Caracas, but I have never seen it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Transport in Venezuela - Category rename to match related pages

Maybe you like to vote at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_9#Category:Transportation_in_Venezuela TruckCard (talk) 01:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Venezuela articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Venezuela articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for this feedback. As suggested, I'm using more recent versions of some articles, such as this, this and this. Interestingly, although these articles are plastered with cleanup/POV tags, the only part flagged by WikiTrust as dubious is the lede of the Chávez article - the rest were ranked as "very trustworthy".

There were also three articles proposed for inclusion.

• The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film) has been included because it scores pretty high, so no problem.
• Venezuelan presidential election, 1998 is an interesting article, and it provides interesting background, but currently the external interest data are way too low (e.g. average 41 hits/day). If the article were substantially improved, we might be able to make a good case, though.
• Presidency of Hugo Chávez is the article for which I would like to solicit feedback. The article has a cleanup tag, but Rd232 suggests, that it "presents recent issues much better than Hugo Chavez does; not perfect, but does a decent job of covering most things that need covering in an adequate way." If others from the project concur with this analysis, I'll include it. I tend to tread carefully when handling such sensitive topics! Please let me know about this one.

Great feedback, thanks, Walkerma (talk) 22:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

The Chavez article is gawdawful. It's replete with bias and editors have been unable to reach a consensus to correct the problems. I would recommend this article NOT be included unless drastic improvements are made to the article.JoelWhy (talk) 15:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The Chavez article is too important to exclude. The question is whether to also include Presidency of Hugo Chávez. Rd232 ^talk 15:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

It makes no sense to arbitrarily include an article, no matter how important, when said article is full of misleading information.JoelWhy (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

There's nothing arbitrary about including a very important article. And whilst it is certainly flawed, "full of misleading information" is a vast exaggeration. How about answering the question that was actually asked? Rd232 ^talk 15:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

No, it is not an exaggeration. It is borderline propaganda. I haven't read through the other article so I don't have an opinion on it. I am advocating for the Chavez article to be excluded because it is far below Wiki standards.JoelWhy (talk) 16:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

There's really no point in getting hysterical, since it's quite likely too late for anything to be done now - the request is over 2 weeks old. Are you declining to read Presidency of Hugo Chávez? Rd232 ^talk 16:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

You have an amusing definition of "hysterical". I became aware of this today so I am expressing my views today. If it's too late, then the undeserving article will be included. If it's not too late, then hopefully they will remove it. As for the other article, if it is not too late, I can certainly go back and review it to provide my opinion.JoelWhy (talk) 17:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

hysterical = current Hugo Chavez article being called "borderline propaganda". Well if you find that amusing, good for you. I'll ask Walkerma if it's too late. Rd232 ^talk 17:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

No, it's not too late at all - I'm swamped with reviewing and still have a few more days of it to go. Rd232 is right about this article being too important to exclude; if we omitted it, while including the leader of every other significant nation in the world, we at the 1.0 Project would be accused of bias. This article is nearly nine years old, and it is read by about one million people a year online in its current state (many more than will read it offline!). I think it just needs a good old-fashioned collaborative cleanup! (I see that people here have already worked on it.) If you can fix the worst aspects of it by next week, we can at least have a half-decent version for the DVD - we'd really appreciate that. Many thanks for your time on this important article, Walkerma (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, Wlkerma. Although, I must respectfully disagree with some of your assessment regarding the Chavez article. There may be many, many visitors to the page, but there are consistently only about 8 people (and, really only 5 or 6 of whom are active) editing the page. We have been as a stand still for months, with an inability to reach a consensus regarding some substantial allegations of bias (allegations which I, obviously, feel are entirely warranted.) It is extremely unlikely this page will be corrected within the next week. In fact, it's unlikely the page will be corrected at all until more editors assist in making the page objective. I understand not wanting to exclude the page, given that the other world leaders are all included. However, I do hope that the offline page will include the tags explaining the dispute regarding the neutrality of the page. At least the visitors to the Wiki page are warned that the piece is in dispute.JoelWhy (talk) 18:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it's quite odd how the relative handful of editors with a real interest in Venezuela manage to neither collaborate effectively nor get much done individually (yours truly being a notable exception for the latter case). With rare exceptions (typically driven by news events) it's fairly unproductive moaning, without use of tools like WP:DR or subpage drafts. Mostly nothing much happens unless somebody tries to fix a tagged problem, when somebody will turn up to complain the problem isn't fixed and so the tag should stay - but make no attempt to fix it. Rd232 ^talk 20:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I can only assume you are not referring to me, as I have made numerous attempts, only to see the additions turned into pro-Chavez fluff. As I have indicated repeatedly (following the numerous disingenuous claims of "well, if it's biased, why don't you fix it!") I am not wasting more time editing an article only to have all objective information removed and replaced with misleading information. I am not accusing you personally of being guilty of this, but I maintain my position that until more editors are brought in, the article will not be improved; and, the only thing to do now is to keep the bias tags on the articles in order to warn readers not to be mislead by the article.JoelWhy (talk) 21:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

(unindent) OK, I understand - it can be very hard in smaller projects that depend on a handful of editors, particularly if there's no clear consensus on how an article should look. Once my main 0.8 work is complete - in a week or so - I'd be willing to work with a couple of you to try and get the article improved. I don't know too much about Chavez, but I'm willing to research things, and I can write coherent English; I may also be able to play the part of a relatively impartial outsider. Let me know if you're interested. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 03:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, absoultely, I think it would be great to get some fresh eyes on the material. Thanks!JoelWhy (talk) 04:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, any efforts to actually get something done will be helpful, and as Joel said, fresh eyes. You should also expect to probably have to perform some element of informal mediation. Rd232 ^talk 09:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Assessment request

could someone please assess (for the project banner on the relevant talk page, using Wikipedia:WikiProject_Venezuela/Assessment#Quality_scale)

• Venezuela Crisis of 1895 (B class)
• Venezuelan presidential election, 1952 (C class)
• Indigenous peoples in Venezuela (start class)
• Venezuelan general strike of 2002–2003 (B class)
• Eva Golinger (start class)
• 2010 Colombia–Venezuela diplomatic crisis (C class)
• Illegal drug trade in Venezuela (start class)
• Luis Miquilena (start class)
• Mission Barrio Adentro (C class)

thanks. Rd232 ^talk 18:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

added my own assessments; having done so many recently, and had no response to this request, I've done my best. Feel free to review/change these assessments. Rd232 ^talk 15:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Looks okay to me, FWIW. Without very good knowledge of the subject matter, I would have considered C-class for Illegal drug trade... and Indigenous peoples..., as the articles seem substantial, but possibly missing important aspects of the topic. Just my 2c. decltype (talk) 12:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing - those are borderline start/C cases, but I prefer slightly wider coverage of the topic before calling it C class. Rd232 ^talk 13:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject cleanup listing

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Popular pages

Would anyone be opposed to adding WP:VEN to the Popular pages project? This will cause a list of the most popular (based on pageview statistics) pages within the scope of the project to be created monthly. This is a useful tool to identify frequently-viewed pages that are not up to par, quality-wise. See for example Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina/Popular pages. Regards, decltype (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Rd232 ^talk 17:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Pageview stats

After a recent request, I added WikiProject Venezuela to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Venezuela/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 01:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Mr.Z-man. decltype (talk) 06:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Artículo mal titulado

El artículo Vincente Nebrada está mal titulado: o es Vicente (en español y su nombre original) o es Vincent (en inglés)... pero esa mezcla... He ampliado considerablemente el artículo en la Wikipedia en español, si alguien se anima a traducirlo sería chévere. Saludos, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Epa Laura!

Gracias por señalar el error! Lo he cambiado al nombre del artículo a "Vicente Nebrada". Hiciste un buen trabajo con el artículo en español. Tal vez alguien que sabe mejor español que yo puede traducirlo ahora :). Saludos, decltype (talk) 11:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Venezuelan ministries

Hi! I noticed there was a Ministry of the Popular Power for the Public Works and Dwellings (Ministerio del Poder Popular para las Obras Públicas y Vivienda)

• http://replay.web.archive.org/*/http://www.infraestructura.gob.ve/
• English name from: "Venezuela will be a country with food independence." June 15, 2009. (not archived on web.archive.org, but the quote "Ministry of the Popular Power for the Public Works and Dwellings" shows up in search engines)

But now there is a Ministerio del Poder Popular para Transporte y Comunicaciones

• http://www.mtc.gob.ve

Conviasa was subservient to the former, and is now to the latter (see http://www.mtc.gob.ve/organismos , where it is listed).

Did the first ministry change its name and become the second? Or was the first ministry abolished? WhisperToMe (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

In June 2010 Obras Públicas y Vivienda was split into Transporte y Comunicaciones and Vivienda y Hábitat. [4] Rd232 ^talk 06:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! That answered my question - Now, is there an official English name for the Transportation and Communications ministry? WhisperToMe (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't know about official, but I'd go with Ministry of Transport and Communications. Rd232 ^talk 06:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

That works. Thank you very much :) WhisperToMe (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The redirect above needs to be re-established, since it's a direct translation of the Venezuelan Spanish, and all plausible alternate names need to be redirected. For instance http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:1RYn4A57Xl0J:www.inder.gob.ve/agricultura_al_dia.php%3Fid%3D2061%26anho%3D2009%26mes%3D03+%22Ministry+of+the+Popular+Power+for+the+Public+Works+and+Dwellings%22&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com refers to "Ministry of the Popular Power for the Public Works and Dwellings ", "Ministry of the Popular Power for the Food", "Ministries of the Popular Power for the Interior Relations and Justice", and ..."for the Agriculture and Lands" WhisperToMe (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

JIAAC

I'm also having trouble trying to find the current website of the JIAAC (the accident investigation authority)

I found individual pages:

• http://www.mtc.gob.ve/index.php/resena-historica
• http://www.mtc.gob.ve/index.php/contacto-de-la-jiaac
  • "Contacto de la JIAAC" - Says "Dirección: Av. Francisco de Miranda, Edificio Sede Piso 20, Junta Investigadora de Accidentes de Aviación Civil, Chacao, Caracas 1010, Distrito capital – Venezuela"

I would also like to know where its accident investigation reports are - I would like to see a PDF of the West Caribbean Airways Flight 708 accident report (in Spanish and, if available, in English too) WhisperToMe (talk) 05:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

• Okay, I found a copy on aviation herald, but I want to see if there is a copy on the actual ministry website, or if there is a copy in English. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't think so. JIAAC has some press releases about incidents, not proper reports, that I can find. Rd232 ^talk 06:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
    • That's odd. There are copies of the JIAAC report on the West Caribbean crash, but it's on the Aviation Herald website, and only in Spanish: http://avherald.com/files/west_caribbean_informe_final_hk4374x_058_2005.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 06:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

http://www.mtc.gob.ve/ministerio/jiaac seems to be the homepage. I still would like help in locating the reports... WhisperToMe (talk) 06:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Mfd notice of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mercosur

I have nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject Mercosur for deletion at WP:MFD. Please comment here for any concerns. Thanks. JJ98 (Talk) 01:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Indian Reservation

Are there indian reservation in Venezuela? Or something like indian reservation? Indian territory? Where I get information about them?--Kaiyr (talk) 14:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Hugo Chávez

For many months Hugo Chávez has been tagged as having BLP problems. It is still this way and very few Wikipedians have been involved in the discussion. It is time to bring the larger community into it. See Talk:Hugo_Chávez#Transparent WhisperToMe (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Venezuela will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in Venezuela's history, society and culture. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Venezuela and the Millennium Development Goals

I plan on contributing a section to the Venezuela Wikipedia page. The section I would add would focus on Venezuela's progress on the Millennium Development Goals. Venezuela continues to be one of the most talked about nations because of its president Hugo Chavez and his political views. In an effort to meet the Millennium Development Goals, President Chavez and the Venezuelan government have implemented a number of social programs, many of which have been successful. Even though many international actors have criticized Venezuela's "socialist" policies, the country has actually been experiencing progress in relation to the Millennium Development Goals. The article contribution would evaluate the country's progress on all eight of the goals. In fact, if progress is evident in Venezuela, it will serve as a model country, a beacon of hope, for other developing and developed nations. Since this article contribution specifically relates to Venezuela, I would like to add my article contribution to the project. This WikiProject will allow my page to be more accountable to Venezuelan economic policy and politics. In addition, I appreciate all feedback on the article topic and the article itself. It is necessary to look at an individual country's progress on the Millennium Development Goals in order to evaluate the global initiative on the whole. Stnicks007 (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Stnicks007.

Government agencies

When did Venezuela open the new government agencies? Looks like Junta Investigadora de Accidentes de Aviación Civil and INAC are no longer active. Instead the Ministry of Aquatic and Air Transport is now here. Did the Ministry of Transport and Communications (Venezuela) go away too? WhisperToMe (talk) 18:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

2010 Venezuelan self-coup

2010 Venezuelan self-coup, which currently redirects to Hugo Chávez, is currently being discussed at Redirects for Discussion. Comments from members of this project would be particularly welcome in the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 May 7#2010 Venezuelan self-coup. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 17:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

This won't hit WikiProject Venezuela alerts automatically, so notifying manually:

• Roberto Maytin → Roberto Maytín
• Roman Recarte → Román Recarte

discussion is on Talk:Andres Artunedo Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

category:Paralympic athletes of Venezuela

Hi. Help needed on Anibal Bello, Samuel Colmenares, Oduver Daza, Fernando Ferrer (athlete), Ricardo Santana, Yoldani Silva, Jose Villarreal, all could do with some sourcing. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

State articles

Survey of current assessments of state articles:

• Stubs: Amazonas, Venezuela, Anzoátegui, Barinas, Venezuela, Bolívar, Venezuela, Cojedes, Venezuela, Falcón, Guárico, Lara, Venezuela, Mérida, Venezuela, Portuguesa, Venezuela, Sucre, Venezuela, Táchira, Trujillo, Venezuela, Yaracuy; and Venezuelan Capital District and Federal Dependencies of Venezuela
• Start class: Apure, Aragua, Delta Amacuro, Miranda, Venezuela, Zulia
• C-class: Carabobo, Monagas, Vargas, Venezuela

Rd232 ^talk 19:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Infobox initiative

I've recently found some major Venezuelan cities without {{infobox settlement}}. Now I know opinions differ on infoboxes, but this one provides a very useful map (if the article has coordinates available). So, building on some efforts of mine from a while ago, I'm having a little initiative to check infobox coverage, and will record progress here. In the unlikely event anyone else is interested - feel free to comment or help! Rd232 ^talk 21:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

• state capitals: (per {{State_capitals_of_Venezuela}}): done Barcelona,_Anzoátegui, San Carlos, Cojedes, San Juan de los Morros. All others OK (note Santa Ana de Coro uses {{Infobox World Heritage Site}} instead). Rd232 ^talk 22:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
• states: all have {{Infobox Venezuelan state}} Rd232 ^talk 04:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
• List of cities in Venezuela Rd232 ^talk 05:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
• Working from Municipalities of Venezuela:
  • Shire towns all exist and have infoboxes: Amazonas
  • Missing various shire towns, all existing have infoboxes: Anzoátegui, Aragua (2)

Rd232 ^talk 11:09, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Indian Reservation

Are there indian reservation in Venezuela? Or something like indian reservation? Indian territory? Where I get information about them?--Kaiyr (talk) 19:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Spanish MOS Needed?

I noted three months back to a couple of IPA pronunciation expert editors that Category:Wikipedia_Manual_of_Style_(regional) has:

• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Canada-related articles Shortcuts: WP:CSG WP:CANSTYLE WP:MOSCAN MOS:CA
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/China-related articles Shortcuts: MOS:CHINESE WP:MOS-ZH WP:MOSCHINA
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/France & French-related Shortcuts: WP:MOS-FR WP:FRMOS
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Hawaii-related articles Shortcut: MOS:HAWAII
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/India-related articles Shortcut: WP:MOSIN
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles Shortcuts: WP:IMOS WP:MOS-IE
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles Shortcuts: WP:MOS-JA WP:MJ MOS:JAPAN
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Korea-related articles Shortcuts: MOS:KO WP:MOS-KO WP:MOSKOREA
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Philippine-related articles Shortcut: WP:MOSPHIL
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Poland-related articles Shortcut: WP:MOSPOL
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Singapore-related articles Shortcut: WP:MOSSG

but not:

• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spain & Spanish-related Shortcuts: WP:MOS-ES

Is there really nothing at all that could benefit by giving guidance? For instance:

1. Like when to use a Catalan place name, when to use a Spanish one?
2. Like whether to use accents on capitals, like Oscar or Óscar?
3. IPA pronunciation?
4. Spelling between Iberian and American varieties of Spanish?
5. How to treat Quechua (Runa Simi) and other articles?
6. and so on?

In ictu oculi (talk) 07:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Socialism of the 21st century and Bolivarianism

Hi folks, it appears to me that Socialism of the 21st century is just another term for Bolivarianism, even if it wasn't necessarily coined that way. Is this a complete misunderstanding, or might a merge be appropriate? Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

It may seem synonymous in present-day Venezuela, but if you look at the Bolivarianism article, not only does Bolivarianism have a much longer history, but it's not necessarily socialist. Rd232 ^talk 21:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps this is why it's tagged as misleading. The Components section suggests it's all about Chavez. There's the section on Pan-Americanism, but the {{main}} there implies that it's a separate doctrine. I wonder if merging Socialism of the 21st century and Chavismo makes more sense. --BDD (talk) 21:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Good Article Reassessment of Santa María de La Cabeza castle

Santa María de La Cabeza castle, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Note: the article was reviewed and approved last night, and the instructions for reassessment say to notify the relevant WikiProjects; yours is the one listed on the talk page. Thank you! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Controversy on Bolivarian Intelligence Service

Hi all at WikiProject Venezuela!
I just thought I ought to bring to your attention the Bolivarian Intelligence Service page contains a rather controversial section at the end of the article. I have tagged and put banners on the article, but have very little knowledge of the subject myself. Maybe somebody from the project with more info on the Service could take a look at the article. Regards Marcool04 (talk) 15:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Redesign

Hey! I have been very interested in the project lately and working on articles and lists for good and featured status. I see that the project page is currently a mess and may need a redesign. I can design the new page and give it a good look, easy to navigate and more appealing. Also, I am planning to take all presidential election article to good article status (may do featured later) and all regional and municipal articles to featured list status. If anyone is willing to help me, I will be glad. — ΛΧΣ21™ 05:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC) The needs table could be higher up no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Simon Bolivar (Tadolina)

I started an article for this sculpture, one copy of which is located in Venezuela. However, I am having difficulty finding much information about the cast in Venezuela, possibly because I do not speak Spanish but also possibly because the artist's last name might have alternative spellings (hard for me to tell). Might any WikiProject Venezuela participants be able to assist with the expansion of this article, perhaps by adding sources in English or Spanish? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 22:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

2014 Venezuelan protests

Since some changes have been made, the 2014 Venezuelan protests article should have its quality and importance looked at again. --Zfigueroa (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Does this school cover high school? (Wikipedia notability)

I want to see if this school includes high school. If it has bachillerato does that mean high school? http://www.instituto-escuela.com/instituto-escuela/que-ofrecemos/ - Why: Any high school educating to age 18 is presumed notable on Wikipedia. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles within Category:LGBT in the Americas may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer _(Talk) 21:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nubia Rosa Gutierrez Bravo

Dear Venezuela experts: Here's an abandoned AfC submission that will soon be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable person, and should the article be kept and improved? —Anne Delong (talk) 17:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Reformatting and expanding the List of Presidents of Venezuela

Hello everyone! It would be greatly appreciated if someone can help at Talk:List of Presidents of Venezuela#Reformatting and expanding the article. Also, if you know some users who would be interested to help, please inform them. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Languages in censuses and Race and ethnicity in censuses

Pleas add information about this country to this articles.--Kaiyr (talk) 05:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

United States of Venezuela

The term "United States of Venezuela" was used for the First Republic of Venezuela and the Second Republic of Venezuela, but it is not mentioned at History of Venezuela. So where (if anywhere) should the redirect United States of Venezuela be targeted? Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 26#United States of Venezuela. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Francisco Alarcon

Dear Venezuela experts: This old AfC submission needs some reliable, independent sources, which are likely not in English. The editor has left a note asking for some help. Any takers? —Anne Delong (talk) 22:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Comunas [the old or new way to Govern]

Is anybody going to do any follow-up on Chavez 2012 ? and the "comunas" ?