Draft talk:GA Telesis

COI disclosure

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 15:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

AFC Comments

@CNMall41 Hi there! To respond to your WP:ORGCRIT request on the intial AFC comment you made, probably the best ORIGCRIT source would be this Florida Trend article, recently added after your initial comment was posted.

I would say that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the leasing situation which arose from it also can meet ORIGCRIT. The Irish Independent source added in one of my most recent edit sessions (at least as of writing) and the existing material on the Rossiya settlement I believe are sufficient RS sourcing which contribute to notability.

As a recommendation if you decide to do some research on your own, there does seem to be a lot from the company on PR Newswire; I'd recommend that you use search operators to exclude -pr and -newswire. Usable sources do exist but they are harder to find without implementing the search operators. Thanks! InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 13:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. The Irish Independent is not about the company. It is about a unit of the company. The Florida Trend article is okay but I do not see anything else which is why I was inquiring. I wouldn't do any of the research on my own outside of what is already in the draft, especially given that you are paid to do such to show notability. If you have more references you can point out that you feel meet ORGCRIT please ping me. At the moment, it does not appear there is enough to establish notability under WP:NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

@CNMall41 Sure thing, though I would disagree with how the Irish Independent is seemingly being discounted/downplayed. I would suggest that you take it into consideration with the other references

• The Boeing deal, per the reference to ainonline.com (Ref #13 as of writing), should be sufficient to determine the scope of the company. As one of the primary suppliers to aviation companies for repairs, I would say that it alone would make a strong case for notability.
• The Scientific Daily reference recently added (Ref #2 as of writing) highlights GA Telesis to a minor degree. It's borderline between passing and significant, though the Honeywell partnership being highlighted as well as the other references to it would be strong cases for notability. While Scientific Daily's fulfillment of SIRS is unlikely
• The SPAH in Wilmington, Ohio, has been a major advancement for its local economy. The company has informed me that its Special Procedures Aeroengine Hospital is the only certified system in the world for engine maintenance of its type (and its acronym SPAH has been trademarked by the company), though no RS has seemed to cover the ownership and pioneering of the SPAH. While this information must be left out to avoid violating OR at least for now, the SPAH has been widely found in relevant aviation news, including but not limited to all of the sourcing in what is presently in the third to last paragraph in the history section, and even without the mention of inventing it the technology and certifications that GA has for the SPAHs in Wilmington and Helsinki are sufficient information enough to majorly contribute to NCORP fulfillment. Aviation Week's article on the Helsinki SPAH alone meets SIRS, with several primary and local sources as well.
• Consider the Wall Street Journal article, and the billion dollars between the two GAIN funds. As of writing, even without adjusting for inflation which would add at least 28.1%, that is more than the market cap of several companies, including First Watch, Trivago, Jack in the Box, Fiverr, Petco, Imax and Bally's. Also note that pre-COVID annual revenue topped $1 billion company wide, in a single year. Market capitalization and revenue are not as significant figures alone, but that amount of money in a single company, moreover in revenue, is not something to be taken lightly. The WSJ article alone fulfills SIRS based on RSP, which states that Most editors consider The Wall Street Journal generally reliable for news. Its dominant coverage within the previewed amount enables us to determine that it reasonably meets SIRS
• The Salesforce lawsuit seems to be presently stuck in discovery according to the most recent PACER data I have access to, but the headlines it generated in the legal world so far can contribute majorly towards notability. The source covering it is significant, independent, reliable, and secondary, meeting the primary criteria for NCORP.

The Honeywell and Boeing partnerships alone I think would strongly corroborate meeting the notability of the company by substance and actions I think that the company's various smaller headlines, though not alone able to meet substance, when combined with everything strengthen the case to most certainly meet NCORP. For other SIRS points, also see reference 38 from AIN Online covering the autoclaves and radome facilities at the Fort Lauderdale composite shop, and the Tokyo Century buyout in reference 42.

As a side note, I've tried to cut down on promotionalism to an extent. Though my friendship with the Moabery family provides that I cannot be completely unbiased, I have done what I could. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional information. Your responses seem to focus on their accomplishments on why they should be notable. I agree this should be the first step. However, NCORP is a steep hill and we need the in-depth coverage which supports it. I do not see it here and will pass on reviewing as I would wind up declining. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)