Wikipedia

Sri Vaishnavism

(Redirected from Munitraya Sampradayam)

Sri Vaishnavism (Sanskrit: श्रीवैष्णवसम्प्रदाय, romanized: Śrīvaiṣṇavasampradāya) is a denomination within the Vaishnavism tradition of Hinduism,[4] predominantly practiced in South India. The name refers to goddess Lakshmi (also known as Sri), as well as a prefix that means "sacred, revered", and the god Vishnu, who are together revered in this tradition.[5][6]

Sri Vaishnavism
The Ranganathaswamy Temple of Srirangam is the largest Hindu temple in India.[1]
Regions with significant populations
India, Nepal
Religions
Vaishnavism (Hinduism)
Scriptures
Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, Brahma Sutra, Pancharatra, Prabandham[2][3]
Languages
Tamil, Sanskrit

The tradition traces its roots to the ancient Vedas and Pancharatra texts, popularised by the Alvars and their canon, the Naalayira Divya Prabandham.[7][8][9] The founding of Sri Vaishnavism is traditionally attributed to Nathamuni of the 10th century CE;[10] its central philosopher has been Ramanuja of the 11th century, who developed the Vishishtadvaita ("qualified non-dualism") Vedanta sub-school of Hindu philosophy.[11][12] The tradition split into two denominations around the 16th century. The Vadakalai who follow the doctrine of Vedanta Desika, whereas the Tenkalai who follow the principles of Manavala Mamunigal.[13][14] The Telugu Brahmins of the Sri Vaishnava tradition form a single distinct sect called the Andhra Vaishnavas, and are not divided into the Vadakalai and Tenkalai denominations, unlike the Tamil Iyengars.[15]

The most striking difference between Sri Vaishnavas and other Vaishnava groups lies in their interpretation of the Vedas. While other Vaishnava groups interpret Vedic deities like Indra, Savitar, Bhaga, Rudra, etc., to be the same as their Puranic counterparts, Sri Vaishnavas consider these to be different names/roles/forms of Narayana, thus claiming that the entirety of the Vedas is dedicated to Vishnu reverence alone. Sri Vaishnavas have remodelled the Pancharatra homas (rituals) to include Vedic suktas (hymns) in them, thus integrating them with a Vedic perspective.[citation needed]

Etymology

edit

The name Sri Vaishnavism (IAST: Śrīvaiṣṇavism) is derived from two words, Sri and Vaishnavism. In Sanskrit, the word Sri refers to goddess Lakshmi as well as a prefix that means "sacred, revered", and god Vishnu who are together revered in this tradition.[4][6] The word Vaishnavism refers to a tradition that reveres god Vishnu as the supreme god.[16] The followers of Sri Vaishnavism are known as the Sri Vaishnava(s) (IAST: Śrīvaiṣṇava, श्रीवैष्णव).[17]

History

edit
See also: Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam

Theological origins

edit

The tradition traces its roots to the primordial start of the world through Vishnu, and to the texts of Vedic era with both Sri and Vishnu found in ancient texts of the 1st millennium BCE particularly to the Puranas, Upanishads, and the Bhagavad Gita.[8][14]

Historical origins

edit

The historical basis of Sri Vaishnavism is in the syncretism of two developments. The first is Sanskrit traditions found in ancient texts such as the Vedas and the Agama (Pancaratra), and the second is the Tamil traditions found in early medieval texts (Tamil Prabandham)[18] and practices such as the emotional songs and music of Alvars that expressed spiritual ideas, ethics and loving devotion to god Vishnu.[19][8][9] The Sanskrit traditions likely represent the ideas shared in ancient times, from the Ganges river plains of the northern Indian subcontinent, while the Tamil traditions likely have roots in the Kaveri river plains of southern India, particularly what in modern times are the coastal Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu region.[20]

The tradition was founded by Nathamuni (10th century), who combined the two traditions, by drawing on Sanskrit philosophical tradition and combining it with the aesthetic and emotional appeal of the Bhakti movement pioneers called the Alvars.[10] Sri Vaishnavism developed in Tamil Nadu in the 10th century, after Nathamuni returned from a pilgrimage to Vrindavan in north India (modern Uttar Pradesh).[19]

Nathamuni's ideas were continued by Yamunacharya, who maintained that the Vedas and Pancaratras are equal, devotional rituals and bhakti are important practices.[10] The legacy of Yamunacharya was continued by Ramanuja (1017-1137),[21] but they never met.[22] Legend goes that Ramanuja saw Yamunacharya's corpse, which had three fingers curled. Ramanuja was told that they represented the three wishes that Yamunacharya had revealed before he passed. One of the wishes was that Ramanuja should write a commentary on the Brahma Sutras.[23] Ramanuja, a scholar who studied in an Advaita Vedanta monastery and disagreed with some of the ideas of Advaita, became the most influential leader of Sri Vaishnavism.[24][25] He developed the Visistadvaita ("qualified non-dualism") philosophy.[10]

Around 14th century, Ramanandi Sampradaya split from it.[26][27] Around the 18th century, the Sri Vaishnava tradition split into the Vadakalai ("northern culture", Vedic) and Tenkalai ("southern culture", Bhakti).[13][14] The Vadakalai placed more emphasis on the Sanskrit traditions, while the Tenkalai relied more on the Tamil traditions.[28]Although this difference is very superficial and basically non-existent in practical reality. This theological dispute between the Vedic and Bhakti traditions traces it roots to the debate between Srirangam and Kanchipuram monasteries between the 13th and 15th century.[13] The debate then was on the nature of salvation and the role of grace. The Bhakti-favouring Tenkalai tradition asserted, states Patricia Mumme, that Vishnu saves the soul like "a mother cat carries her kitten", where the kitten just accepts the mother while she picks her up and carries.[13] In contrast the Vedic-favouring Vadakalai tradition asserted that Vishnu saves the soul like "a mother monkey carries her baby", where the baby has to make an effort and hold on while the mother carries.[13] This metaphorical description of the disagreement between the two sub-traditions, first appears in the 18th-century Tamil texts, but historically refers to the foundational ideas behind the karma-marga versus bhakti-marga traditions of Hinduism.[29]

Reverence for Vishnu and Lakshmi

edit

Along with Vishnu, and like Shaivism, the ultimate reality and truth is considered in Sri Vaishnavism to be the divine sharing of the feminine and the masculine, the goddess and the god.[30] Sri (Lakshmi) is regarded as the preceptor of the Sri Vaishnava sampradaya. Goddess Sri has been considered inseparable from god Vishnu, and essential to each other, and to the act of mutual loving devotion. Sri and Vishnu act and cooperate in the creation of everything that exists, and redemption.[30] According to some medieval scholars of Sri Vaishnava theology, states John Carman, Sri and Vishnu do so using "divine knowledge that is unsurpassed" and through "love that is an erotic union".[30] But Sri Vaishnavism differs from Shaivism, in that Vishnu is ultimately the sole creator, preserver and destroyer of the universe while Sri Lakshmi is the medium for salvation, the kind mother who recommends to Vishnu and thereby helps living beings in their desire for redemption and salvation.[30] In contrast, in Shaivism, the goddess (Shakti) is the energy and power of Shiva and she is the equal with different roles, supreme in the role of creator and destroyer.[31]

The prefix Sri is used for this sect because they give special importance to the worship of the Goddess Lakshmi, the consort of Vishnu, who they believe to act as a mediator between God Vishnu and man.[30][32]

Philosophy

edit

Vishishtadvaita

edit
Main article: Vishishtadvaita

Sri Vaishnavism's philosophical foundation was established by Ramanuja, who started his Vedic studies with Yadava Prakaasa in an Advaita Vedanta monastery.[24] He brought Upanishadic ideas to this tradition, and wrote texts on qualified monism, called Vishishtadvaita in the Hindu tradition.[33][34] His ideas are one of three subschools in Vedanta, the other two are known as Adi Shankara's Advaita (absolute monism) and Madhvacharya's Dvaita (dualism).[33]

Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita asserts that Atman (souls) and Brahman[note 1] are different, a difference that is never transcended.[35][36] God Vishnu alone is independent, all other gods and beings are dependent on him.[37] However, in contrast to Dvaita Vedanta philosophy of Madhvacharya, Ramanuja asserts "qualified non-dualism",[38] that souls share the same essential nature of Brahman,[38] and that there is a universal sameness in the quality and degree of bliss possible for human souls, and every soul can reach the bliss state of God himself.[35][39] While the 13th- to 14th-century Madhvacharya asserted both "qualitative and quantitative pluralism of souls", Ramanuja asserted "qualitative monism and quantitative pluralism of souls", states Sharma.[40] The other philosophical difference between Madhvacharya's Vaishnavism Sampradaya and Ramanuja's Vaishnavism Sampradaya,[note 2] has been on the idea of eternal damnation; Madhvacharya believed that some souls are eternally doomed and damned, while Ramanuja disagreed and accepted the Advaita Vedanta view that everyone can, with effort, achieve inner liberation and spiritual freedom (moksha).[42][43]

Theology

Śrīvaiṣṇava theologians state that the poems of
the Alvars contain the essential meaning of
the Sanskrit Vedas.

— John Carman and Vasudha Narayanan[44]

According to Sri Vaishnavism theology, moksha can be reached by devotion and service to the Lord and detachment from the world. When moksha is reached, the cycle of reincarnation is broken and the soul is united with Vishnu, though maintaining their distinctions, in Vaikuntha, Vishnu's heaven.[45] Moksha can also be reached by total surrender (saranagati), an act of grace by the Lord.[46]

God, according to Ramanuja's Sri Vaishnavism philosophy, has both soul and body; all of life and the world of matter is the glory of God's body.[25] The path to Brahman (Vishnu), asserted Ramanuja, is devotion to godliness and constant remembrance of the beauty and love of personal god (saguna Brahman, Vishnu).[25][34][47] Ramanuja's theory posits both Brahman and the world of matter are two different absolutes, both metaphysically real, neither one false or illusive, and saguna Brahman with attributes is also real.[34]

Comparisons with Advaita Vedanta

edit

Ramanuja accepted that the Vedas are a reliable source of knowledge, then critiqued other schools of Hindu philosophy, including Advaita Vedanta, as having failed in interpreting all of the Vedic texts.[48] He asserted, in his Sri Bhashya, that purvapaksin (previous schools) selectively interpret those Upanishadic passages that support their monistic interpretation, and ignore those passages that support the pluralism interpretation.[48] There is no reason, stated Ramanuja, to prefer one part of a scripture and not other, the whole of the scripture must be considered on par.[48][49] One cannot, according to Ramanuja, attempt to give interpretations of isolated portions of any scripture. Rather, the scripture must be considered one integrated corpus, expressing a consistent doctrine.[48] The Vedic literature, asserted Ramanuja, mention both plurality and oneness, therefore the truth must incorporate pluralism and monism, or qualified monism.[48]

This method of scripture interpretation distinguishes Ramanuja from Adi Shankara.[49] Shankara's exegetical approach Samanvayat Tatparya Linga with Anvaya-Vyatireka,[50] states that for proper understanding all texts must be examined in their entirety and then their intent established by six characteristics, which includes studying what is stated by the author to be his goal, what he repeats in his explanation, then what he states as conclusion and whether it can be epistemically verified.[51][52] Not everything in any text, states Shankara, has equal weight and some ideas are the essence of any expert's textual testimony.[49] This philosophical difference in scriptural studies, helped Shankara conclude that the Principal Upanishads primarily teach monism with teachings such as Tat tvam asi, while helping Ramanuja conclude that qualified monism is at the foundation of Hindu spirituality.[48][53][54]

Comparisons with Protestant Christianity and Buddhism

edit

John Carman, a professor at the Harvard Divinity School, states that some of the similarities in salvation ideas in Sri Vaishnavism and Protestant Christian doctrines of divine grace are striking.[55] Both accept God as a personal concept, accept devotee's ability to relate to this God without human intermediaries, and accept the idea of sola gratia – salvation through faith by the grace of God alone, such as those found in Martin Luther's teachings.[55] While both Sri Vaishnavism and Protestant Christianity accept a supreme God and shares ideas on the nature of salvation, they differ in their specifics about incarnation such as Jesus Christ being the only incarnation in Christianity, while Sri Vaishnavism accepts many incarnations (avatar) of Vishnu.[56] Christian missionaries in 19th century colonial British India, noted the many similarities and attempted to express the theology of Christianity as a bhakti marga to Hindus, along the lines of Sri Vaishnavism, in their mission to convert them from Hinduism to Christianity.[57]

Similar teachings on the nature of salvation through grace and compassion, adds Carman, are found in the Japanese scholar Shinran's text on Jodo Shinshu sect of Buddhism, even though non-theistic Buddhism and theistic Sri Vaishnavism do differ in their views on God.[55]

Texts and scholarship

edit
Main article: Vishishtadvaita

Sri Vaishnavism philosophy is primarily based on interpreting Vedanta, particularly the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita, the Brahma Sutras and the Narayaniya section of the Mahabharata.[8][58] The Vaishnava Agama texts, also called the Pancaratra, has been an important part of Sri Vaishnava tradition.[10][59] Another theological textual foundation of the tradition are the Tamil bhakti songs of the Alvars (7th to 10th century).[12] The syncretic fusion of the two textual traditions is sometimes referred to as the Ubhaya Vedanta, or dual Vedanta.[12] The relative emphasis between the two has been a historic debate within the Sri Vaishnavism tradition,[2] which ultimately led to the schism into the Vatakalai and Tenkalai sub-traditions around the 18th century.[13][14]

Nathamuni

edit
Main article: Nathamuni

Nathamuni collected the poems of Nammalvar, in the form of Divya Prabandham, likely in the 9th century CE,[60] or the 10th century.[10] One of his lasting contributions was to apply the Vedic theory of music on all the Alvar songs using Sanskrit prosody, calling the resulting choreography as divine music, and teaching his nephews the art of resonant bhakti singing of the Alvar songs.[60] This precedence set the guru-sisya-parampara (teacher-student-tradition) in Sri Vaishnavism.[61] This style of education from one generation to the next, is a tradition called Araiyars, states Guy Beck, which preserved "the art of singing and dancing the verses of the Divya Prabandham" set in the sacred melodies and rhythms described in the Vedic texts.[61]

Nathamuni's efforts to syncretically combine the Vedic knowledge and Alvar compositions, also set the precedence of reverence for both the Vedas and the Alvar bhakti ideas. Nathamuni's scholarship that set Alvar songs in Vedic meter set a historic momentum, and the liturgical and meditational songs continue to be sung in the modern era temples of Sri Vaishnavism, which is part of the service called cevai (Sanskrit: Seva).[60][62]

Nathamuni is also attributed with three texts, all in Sanskrit.[60] These are Nyaya Tattva, Purusha Nirnaya and Yogarahasya.[63] The Yogarahasya text, states Govindacharya, is a meditational text, includes the eight limb yoga similar to that of Patanjali, but emphasizes yoga as "the art of communion with God".[63] The Nyaya Tattva text survives only in quotes and references cited in other texts, and these suggest that it presented epistemic foundations (Nyaya) including the philosophical basis for the Hindu belief on the existence of "soul" (Atman), in contrast to Indian philosophies such as Buddhism that denied the existence of soul.[64][65] Nathamuni, for example asserts,

If "I" did not refer to the true self, there would be no interiority belonging to the soul. The interior is distinguished from the exterior by the concept "I". The aspiration, "May I, having abandoned all suffering, participate freely in infinite bliss", actuates a person whose goal is liberation to study scriptures etc. Were it thought that liberation involved the destruction of the individual, he would run away as soon as the subject of liberation was suggested... The "I", the knowing subject, is the inner self.
— Nyayatattva, Nathamuni, ~9th-10th century, Translator: Christopher Bartley[65]

Yamunacharya

edit
Main article: Yamunacharya

Yamunacharya was the grandson of Nathamuni, also known in Sri Vaishnava tradition as Alavandar, whose scholarship is remembered for correlating Alvar bhakti theology and Pancaratra Agama texts to Vedic ideas.[66] He was the acharya (chief teacher) of Sri Vaishnavism monastery at Srirangam, and was followed by Ramanuja, even though they never met.[22] Yamunacharya composed a number of works important in Sri Vaishnavism, particularly Siddhitrayam (about the nature of Atman, God, universe), Gitarthasangraha (analysis of the Bhagavad Gita), Agamapramanya (epistemological basis of Agamas, mapping them to the Vedas), Maha Purushanirnayam (extension of Nathamuni's treatise), Stotraratnam and Chathuh shloki (bhakti strota texts).[66]

Yamunacharya is also credited with Nitya Grantha and Mayavada Khandana. The Nitya Grantha is a ritual text and suggests methods of daily worship of Narayana (Vishnu).[67] The 10th century Mayavada Khandana text, together with Siddhitrayam of Yamunacharya predominantly critiques the philosophy of the traditionally dominant school of Advaita Vedanta in Hindu philosophy, but also critiques non-Vedic traditions.[68]

Ramanuja

edit
Main article: Ramanuja

The Sri Vaishnava tradition attributes nine Sanskrit texts to Ramanuja[69] – Vedarthasamgraha (literally, "Summary of the Vedas meaning"[note 3]) Sri Bhasya (a review and commentary on the Brahma Sutras), Bhagavad Gita Bhashya (a review and commentary on the Bhagavad Gita), and the minor works titled Vedantadipa, Vedantasara, Gadya Traya (which is a compilation of three texts called the Sharanagati Gadyam, Sriranga Gadyam and the Vaikuntha Gadyam), and Nitya Grantham.

Some modern scholars have questioned the authenticity of all but the three of the largest works credited to Ramanuja; the following texts are considered as authentically traceable to Ramanuja – Shri Bhashya, Vedarthasamgraha, and the Bhagavad Gita Bhashya.[69][71]

Ramanuja's scholarship is predominantly founded on Vedanta, Upanishads in particular.[70][72] He never claims that his ideas were original, but his method of synthesis that combined the Vedic ideas with popular spirituality, states Anne Overzee, is original.[72] Ramanuja, wrote his biographer Ramakrishnananda, was "the culmination of the movement started from the Vedas, nourished by the Alvars, Nathamuni and Yamuncharya".[72]

Ramunaja himself credits the theories he presents, in Vedarthasamgraha, to the ideas of ancient Hindu scholars such as "Bodhyana, Tanka (Brahmanandin), Dramida (Dravidacarya), Guhadeva, Kapardin and Bharuci".[72][73][note 4] The 11th-century scholarship of Ramanuja emphasized the concept of Sarira-Saririn, that is the world of matter and the empirical reality of living beings is the "body of Brahman",[note 5] everything observed is God, one lives in this body of God, and the purpose of this body and all of creation is to empower soul in its journey to liberating salvation.[75][76]

Post Ramanuja period authors

edit
Main articles: Pillai Lokacharya, Manavala Mamunigal, and Vedanta Desika

After Ramanuja several authors composed important theological and exegetical works on Sri Vaishnavism. Such authors include Parsara Bhattar, Nadadoor Ammal, Sudarshan Suri, Pillai Lokacharya, Vedanta Desika, Manavala Mamunigal, Periyavachan Pillai and Rangaramanuja Muni.[77][78][79][80]

Organisation

edit

The Sri Vaishnavism tradition has nurtured an institutional organization of mathas (monasteries) since its earliest days, particularly from the time of Ramanuja. After the death of Yamunacharya, Ramanuja was nominated as the leader of the Srirangam matha, though Yamunacharya and Ramanuja never met.[22] Amongst other things, Ramanuja is remembered in the Sri Vaishnavism tradition for his organizational skills and the lasting institutional reforms he introduced at Srirangam, a system paralleling those at Advaita monasteries of his time and where he studied before joining Srirangam matha. Ramanuja travelled and founded many Sri Vaishnavism mathas across India, such as the one in Melukote.[81][82] The Sri Vaishnavism tradition believes that Ramanuja started 700 mathas, but historical evidence suggests several of these were started later.[83]

 
 
Left: The Parakala monastery of Sri Vaishnavism
Right: A Srirangam temple tower constructed by Ahobila Mutt monastery.[84]

The matha, or a monastery, hosted numerous students, many teachers and an institutionalized structure to help sustain and maintain its daily operations. A matha in Vaishnvaism and other Hindu traditions, like a college, designates teaching, administrative and community interaction functions, with prefix or suffix to names, with titles such as Guru, Acharya, Swami, and Jiyar.[85]

A Guru is someone who is a "teacher, guide or master" of certain knowledge.[86] Traditionally a reverential figure to the student in Hinduism, the guru serves as a "counselor, who helps mold values, shares experiential knowledge as much as literal knowledge, an exemplar in life, an inspirational source and who helps in the spiritual evolution of a student."[87]

An Acharya refers to either a Guru of high rank, or more often to the leader of a regional monastery.[88][89] This position typically involves a ceremonial initiation called diksha by the monastery, where the earlier leader anoints the successor as Acharya.[88][90] A Swami is usually those who interact with community on the behalf of the matha. The chief and most revered of all Vaishnava monasteries, are titled as Jeer, Jiyar, Jeeyar, or Ciyar.[83]

The Sri Vaishnavism mathas, over time, divided into two, those with Tenkalai (southern) tradition and Vadakalai (northern) tradition of Sri Vaishnavism.[91] The Tenkalai-associated mathas are headquartered at Srirangam, while Vadakalai mathas are associated with Kanchipuram. Both these traditions have from 10th-century onwards considered the function of mathas to include feeding the poor and devotees who visit, hosting marriages and community festivals, farming temple lands and flower gardens as a source for food and worship ingredients, being open to pilgrims as rest houses, and this philanthropic role of these Hindu monasteries continues.[92] In the 15th-century, these monasteries expanded by establishing Ramanuja-kuta in major South Indian Sri Vaishnavism locations.[92] The organizationally important Sri Vaishnavism matha are:

Vadakalai and Tenkalai denominations

edit

The Sri Vaishnava tradition is classified into two major denominations called the Vadakalai ("northern art") and Tenkalai ("southern art").[28][94] The northern and southern denominations of Sri Vaishnavism refer respectively to Kanchipuram (the northern part of Tamil country) and Srirangam (the southern part of Tamil country and Kaveri river delta area where Ramanuja wrote his Vedanta treatises from).[13][14][95] These denominations arose as a result of philosophical and traditional divergences in the post-Ramanuja period. The Vadakalai placed emphasis on Sanskrit scriptures such as the Vedas and Pancharatra texts, while the Tenkalai highlighted Tamil texts such as the Naalayira Divya Prabandham of the Alvars.[28][96] The philosophies of Pillai Lokacharya and Vedanta Desika, which evolved consequently, were stabilized by Manavala Mamunigal and Brahmatantra Svatantra Jiyar respectively. When the schism weakened, Vadakalai tradition split into Munitreyam, Ahobila Matha, and Parakala matha. Similarly, Tenkalai tradition split into Kandadais, Telugu Sri Vaishnavas, Soliyar, and Sikkiliyar.[93]

From the ancient period, the Sri Vaishnavism movement flourished in Tamilakam owing to its social inclusiveness, where devotion to the supreme deity (Vishnu) was open without limitation to gender or caste, a tradition led by Alvars in the 7th and the 8th centuries.[97][98] Ramanuja philosophy negated caste, states Ramaswamy.[99] Ramanuja, who led from the Srirangam temple, welcomed outcastes into temples and gave them important roles in temple duties. Medieval temple records and inscriptions suggest that the payments and offerings collected by the temple were shared regardless of caste distinctions.[100]

Scholars offer differing views on the relative approach of the two denominations on caste and gender. Raman states that Tenkalai did not recognise caste barriers and were more liberal in assimilating people from all castes, possibly because this had been the tradition at Srirangam from the earliest days of Sri Vaishnavism.[100] In contrast, Sadarangani states that it was Vadakalai who were more liberal and who did not recognise caste barriers, possibly because they were competing with the egalitarian Virashaiva Hindus (Lingayatism) of Karnataka.[101] Both sects believe in initiation through Pancha Samskara.[102] This ceremony or rite of passage is necessary for one to become a Vaishnava. It is performed by both Brahmins and non-Brahmins in order to become Vaishnavas.[103] Some non-Brahmin Vaishnavas include Telugu Naidu, Tamil Vanniyar and Namadhari.[104] Only those Vaishnavas who are of brahmin caste call themselves as Sri Vaishnavas.[105]

The Tenkalai tradition brought into their fold artisanal castes into community-based devotional movements. Raman states, "it can almost be said that the Tenkalai represented the anti-caste tendencies while the Vadakalai school championed the cause of purity of the Vedic tenets."[100] The Tenkalai held, adds Raman, that anyone can be a spiritual teacher regardless of caste.[100]

The Vadakalai tradition states Sadarangani in contrast to Raman's views, were the liberal cousin of Tenkalai and therefore more successful in gaining devotees, while in southern Tamil lands Shaivism prospered possibly because of "Tenkalai school of Vaishnavism being narrow and orthodox in approach".[101] The Vadakalai school not only succeeded in northern Tamil lands, she adds, but spread widely as it inspired the Bhakti movement in north, west and east India, bringing in Bhakti poet saints from "entire cross-section of class, caste and society".[101]

Tenkalai ("southern art") - Manavala Mamunigal

edit

The Ranganathaswamy Temple, Srirangam belongs to the Tenkalai/Thennacharya tradition and is considered as one of the important sites of Sri Vaishnava tradition. The temple follows the tenkalai tradition but the priests are mostly vadakalai.[106]

 
Tenkalai Sri Vaishnava urdhva pundram

Characteristics

edit

The Tenkalai place higher importance to Tamil slokas than Sanskrit, and lay more emphasis on the worship of Vishnu. The Tenkalai accept prapatti as the only means to attain salvation.[107] They consider Prapatti as an unconditional surrender.[108] The Thenkalais follow the Tamil Prabandham,[109] and assert primacy to rituals in Tamil language.[110] They regard kaivalya (detachment, isolation) as an eternal position within the realm of Vaikuntha (Vishnu's 'eternal abode' or heaven), though it only exists at the outer most regions of Vaikuntha. They further say that God's seemingly contradictory nature as both minuscule and immense are examples of God's special powers that enable Him to accomplish the impossible.

According to the Tenkalai, exalted persons need not perform duties such as Sandhyavandanam; they do so only to set a good example. They don't allow the ringing of bells during worship. The Tenkalai forbid widows to shave (tonsure) their head, quoting the Parashara Smriti.[111] while Vadakalais support the tonsure quoting the Manusmriti,[112]

Demographics

edit
 
Sri Kanchi Prativadibhayankar Jagadguru Anantacharya Gaddi Swamiji, the spiritual preceptor of Tridandi Swami Vishwaksenacharyaji

The Tenkalai trace their lineage to Mudaliyandan, nephew of Ramanuja[113] The Tenkalai are followers of the philosophy of Pillai Lokacharya and Manavala Mamuni,[114][115] who is considered to be the reincarnation of Ramanuja by the Tenkalai.[note 6]

Many of the main preceptors of Sri Vaishnavism and their descendants, before and after Ramanuja, belong to the Tenkalai denomination.

Notable Tenkalai people

edit

Vadakalai ("northern art") - Vedanta Desika

edit
 
Vadagalai Sri Vaishnava Urdhva Pundram
 
Parakala Mutt painting of Vedanta Desikan with Brahmatantra Swatantra Jeeyar

Characteristics

edit

The Vadakalai are followers of Ramanuja and Vedanta Desika,[127][128][129] who founded the Vadakalai sampradaya[130] based on the Sanskritic tradition.[131] They lay more emphasis on the role of Lakshmi i.e. Sri, and uphold Sanskrit Vedas as the ultimate "Pramanam" or authority, although Ubhaya Vedanta[note 8] is used to infer from and establish the doctrine of Vishishtadvaita. The Vadakalai infer that all of the Alvars compositions are derived from the Vedas, and believe that the latter is the ultimate source to reference and defend the doctrine. The Vadakalai lay emphasis on Vedic norms[note 9] as established by Brahmanical tradition. However both vedam and Divya prabandhams are both 2 eyes according to desikar and subsequent acharyas.

The Vadakalai ardently follow the Sanskrit Vedas,[109] and the set of rules prescribed by the Manusmriti and Dharma Shastras.[132][133] The sect is based on the Sankritic tradition,[134] and the set of rules prescribed by the Manusmriti and other Dharma Shastras.[132][133] In Sanskrit the Vadakalai are referred to as Uttara Kalārya.[135]

Traditionally, they believe effort and desire along with Prapatti, as means to attain salvation.[136][137] Also, they consider Prapatti as an act of winning grace.[108]

The tilaka (urdhva pundra) mark of the Vadakalai men is a symbolic representation of Vishnu's right foot. Since Vishnu's right foot is believed to be the origin of the river Ganga, the Vadakalai contend that his right foot should be held in special veneration, and its sign impressed on the forehead. They also apply a central mark (sricharanam) to symbolise the goddess Lakshmi (Vishnu's wife), along with the tiruman (urdhva pundra).[138] The Urdhva Pundra that is vertical and faces upwards denotes that it helps one in reaching Vaikuntha (the spiritual abode of Vishnu), and is also considered to be a warder of evil. Vadakalai women apply a red central mark along with namam only, symbolising Lakshmi seated on a lotus on their foreheads.

Guru Parampara

edit
 
Sri Balmukundacharyaji Maharaj of Jhalariya Mutt, Didwana, Rajasthan

The Vadakalai sect traces its lineage back to Thirukurahi Piran Pillan, Kidambi Acchan and other direct disciples of Ramanuja, and considers Vedanta Desika to be the greatest Acharya of the post Ramanuja era.[127][139][140]

The Vadakalai community consists of the following groups, based on the sampradaya followed:

  • Pancharatra – Followers of Srimad Azhagiya Singar (Srinivasacharya) of Ahobila Mutt.[141][142][143][144] The majority of Vadakalais belongs to this group.[145] His disciples established Mutts at different places in North India, including Varanasi, Chitrakoot and Pushkar.
  • Munitraya – Followers of Srimad Andavan of Andavan Ashramams,[146][147] and Swayamacharyas.[148] The Srirangam Srimad Andavan Ashramam, Poundarikapuram Andavan Ashramam, and most of the present-day Vadagalai 'svayam-acharya purusha' families are directly connected to this acharya parampara, and follow the worship and ritual patterns outlined by]Gopalarya Mahadesikan.
  • Periya Andavan Srinivasa Mahadesikan;
  • Parakala – They are mostly followers Brahmatantra Swatantra Jeeyar of Parakala Mutt, Mysore. Founded in 1399 by Brahmatantra Parakala Jeeyar, the peetadhipathis of this mutt are the preceptors of the royal family of Mysore Kingdom, Wadiyars. This has stayed as a royal mutt of the kings since then, and is a mutt for all Iyengars under this category.[149][better source needed]

Demographics

edit

Traditionally, places of high importance with significant Vadakalai populations included Kanchipuram, Kumbakonam, Tiruvallur, Mysore and Kurnool district.[135][150][151][152][153][154] However, today much of the people have moved to the big cities.

In Vrindavan, the Jankivallabh Mandir of Keshighat is a prominent Vadakalai Sri Vaishnava monastic institution and is associated with the spiritual lineage of the Ahobila Mutt. The present Azhagiya Singar has visited this well known institution in the past as well as recently. It is presently headed by Swami Sri Aniruddhacharyaji Maharaj.

In Rajasthan the Jhalariya Mutt is one of the most prominent Mutts and its branches have spread over to the neighbouring regions of Gujarat and Maharashtra. Sri Swami Balmukundacharyaji was a distinguished scholar and renowned Acharya of this Mutt.

Notable Vadakalai people

edit

The hardcore vadakalai strongholds are Varadaraja Perumal Temple, Kanchipuram, Veeraraghava Swamy Temple, Thiruvallur, Kumbakonam, Mysore, Ahobilam, and Tirupati

Temples following Srivaishnava Sampradaya

edit

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Brahman is the metaphysical ultimate unchanging reality in Vedic and post-Vedic Hinduism, and is Vishnu in Sri Vaishnavism.
  2. ^ These two Vaishnavism traditions are respectively called the Sri Vaishnava sampradaya and the Brahma sampradaya.[41]
  3. ^ This work is predominantly about the Hindu scriptures called the Upanishads which Ramanuja held as the essence of the Vedas.[70]
  4. ^ The texts of most of these scholars is lost to history.
  5. ^ Brahman is the Vedic concept of metaphysical unchanging reality.[74]
  6. ^ He is also known by many other names, such as Azhagiya Manavala Mamunigal, Sundhara Jamatara Muni, Ramya Jamatara Muni, Ramya Jamatara Yogi, Varavaramuni, Yathindhra pravanar, Kanthopayantha, Ramanujan ponnadi, Soumya jamathru yogindhrar, Koil Selva manavala mamunigal etc. He also has the titles Periya Jeeyar, Vellai Jeeyar, Visthavak sikhamani, Poi IllAtha Manavala Mamuni.
  7. ^ Ramanujan's father belongs to Thenkalai sect while his mother belongs to Vadakalai sect
  8. ^ The Sanskrit Vedas and the Dravida Veda, the composition of Alwars, which are held in equal esteem
  9. ^ Also known as anushtaanams

References

edit
  1. ^ Faiths across Time [4 volumes]: 5,000 Years of Religious History [4 volumes]. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. 15 January 2014. ISBN 978-1-61069-026-3.
  2. ^ a b Ranjeeta Dutta 2007, pp. 22–43.
  3. ^ John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989, pp. 3–8.
  4. ^ a b Matchett 2000, p. 4, 200.
  5. ^ Matchett 2000, p. 4, 77, 200.
  6. ^ a b John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989, pp. xvii, 3–4.
  7. ^ Lester 1966, pp. 266–269.
  8. ^ a b c d Francis Clooney & Tony Stewart 2004, pp. 167–168.
  9. ^ a b John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989, pp. 3–4, 36–42, 181.
  10. ^ a b c d e f Flood 1996, p. 136.
  11. ^ Morgan 1953.
  12. ^ a b c John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989, pp. 3–4.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g Mumme 1987, p. 257.
  14. ^ a b c d e Bryant 2007, pp. 286–287.
  15. ^ Bhattacharya, Jogendra Nath (1896). Hindu Castes and Sects. Thacker, Spink. p. 98. ISBN 1298966337. The Sri Vaishnavas among the Telingana Brahmans form a distinct caste called Andhra Vaishnava. They are not sub-divided as Vadgala and Tengala like their co-religionists of Dravida
  16. ^ Stephan Schuhmacher (1994). The Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion: Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Zen. Shambhala. p. 397. ISBN 978-0-87773-980-7.
  17. ^ श्रीवैष्णव, Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Koeln University, Germany (2011)
  18. ^ Klaus K. Klostermaier (1984). Mythologies and Philosophies of Salvation in the Theistic Traditions of India. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-88920-158-3.
  19. ^ a b Flood 1996, p. 135-136.
  20. ^ John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989, pp. 3–5.
  21. ^ John Carman 1974, pp. 45, 80.
  22. ^ a b c Jon Paul Sydnor (2012). Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology. Casemate. pp. 20–22 with footnote 32. ISBN 978-0227680247.
  23. ^ "Ramanuja | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Retrieved 21 July 2023.
  24. ^ a b Patrick Olivelle (1992). The Samnyasa Upanisads : Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism and Renunciation. Oxford University Press. pp. 10–11, 17–18. ISBN 978-0-19-536137-7.
  25. ^ a b c J.A.B. van Buitenen (2008), Ramanuja - Hindu theologian and Philosopher, Encyclopædia Britannica
  26. ^ "Ramanandi Sampradaya".
  27. ^ Tattwananda, Swami (1984), Vaisnava Sects, Saiva Sects, Mother Worship (1st revised ed.), Calcutta: Firma KLM Private Ltd., p. 10
  28. ^ a b c Flood 1996, p. 137.
  29. ^ Mumme 1987, pp. 257–266.
  30. ^ a b c d e John Carman 1994, p. 151.
  31. ^ John Carman 1994, pp. 151–152.
  32. ^ Tapasyananda 2011, p. 53.
  33. ^ a b Bruce M. Sullivan (2001). The A to Z of Hinduism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 239. ISBN 978-0-8108-4070-6.
  34. ^ a b c Joseph P. Schultz (1981). Judaism and the Gentile Faiths: Comparative Studies in Religion. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 81–84. ISBN 978-0-8386-1707-6.
  35. ^ a b Stafford Betty (2010), Dvaita, Advaita, and Viśiṣṭādvaita: Contrasting Views of Mokṣa, Asian Philosophy: An International Journal of the Philosophical Traditions of the East, Volume 20, Issue 2, pages 215-224
  36. ^ Edward Craig (2000), Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge, ISBN 978-0415223645, pages 517-518
  37. ^ Sharma 1994, p. 373.
  38. ^ a b Stoker 2011.
  39. ^ Sharma 1994, pp. 373–374.
  40. ^ Sharma 1994, p. 374.
  41. ^ Klostermaier 2007, p. 304.
  42. ^ Sharma 1994, pp. 374–375.
  43. ^ Bryant 2007, pp. 361–362.
  44. ^ John Carman & Vasudha Narayanan 1989, p. 6.
  45. ^ Flood 1996, p. 136-137.
  46. ^ Flood 1996, p. 137: the tenkalai emphasized the Tamil scriptures and surrender to the Lord by his grace.
  47. ^ Jon Paul Sydnor (2012). Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology. Casemate. pp. 10–11. ISBN 978-0227680247.
  48. ^ a b c d e f Shyam Ranganathan (2011), Rāmānuja (c. 1017 - c. 1137), IEP, York University
  49. ^ a b c John Carman 1994, p. 86.
  50. ^ Mayeda 2006, pp. 46–53.
  51. ^ Mayeda & Tanizawa (1991), Studies on Indian Philosophy in Japan, 1963–1987, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 41, No. 4, pages 529–535
  52. ^ Michael Comans (1996), Śankara and the Prasankhyanavada, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pages 49–71
  53. ^ John Carman 1994, pp. 86–88.
  54. ^ Julius Lipner (1986), The Face of Truth: A Study of Meaning and Metaphysics in the Vedantic Theology of Ramanuja, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0887060397, pages 120-123
  55. ^ a b c John Carman 1994, pp. 117–118, 148–153.
  56. ^ John Carman 1994, pp. 196–197, for context see 190-201.
  57. ^ Klostermaier 2007, pp. 387–389.
  58. ^ Lester 1966, pp. 266–282.
  59. ^ Klostermaier 2007, p. 487.
  60. ^ a b c d Constance Jones; James D. Ryan (2006). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Infobase. p. 490. ISBN 978-0-8160-7564-5.
  61. ^ a b Guy L. Beck (2012). Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 119–120. ISBN 978-1-61117-108-2.
  62. ^ Guy L. Beck (2012). Sonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition. University of South Carolina Press. pp. 118–127. ISBN 978-1-61117-108-2.
  63. ^ a b Alkandavilli Govindacharya (1906). The Life of Râmânujâchârya: The Exponent of the Viśistâdvaita Philosophy. S. Murthy. pp. 9–10 with footnotes.
  64. ^ John Sheveland (2013). Piety and Responsibility: Patterns of Unity in Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, and Vedanta Desika. Ashgate Publishing. pp. 113–114. ISBN 978-1-4094-8144-7.
  65. ^ a b Christopher Bartley (2011). An Introduction to Indian Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 177–178. ISBN 978-1-84706-449-3.
  66. ^ a b Dalal 2010, p. 399.
  67. ^ C. R. Sreenivasa Ayyangar (1908). The Life and Teachings of Sri Ramanujacharya. R. Venkateshwar. pp. 130 footnote 2.
  68. ^ M.C. Alasingaperumal (1900). The Brahmavâdin, Volume 5. Madras: Brahmavâdin Press. pp. 466–467.
  69. ^ a b Jon Paul Sydnor (2012). Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology. Casemate. pp. 2–4. ISBN 978-0227680247.
  70. ^ a b Jon Paul Sydnor (2012). Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology. Casemate. p. 4. ISBN 978-0227680247.
  71. ^ Robert Lester (1966), Ramanuja and Shri Vaishnavism: the Concept of Prapatti or Sharanagati, History of Religion, Volume 5, Issue 2, pages 266-282
  72. ^ a b c d Anne Hunt Overzee (1992). The Body Divine: The Symbol of the Body in the Works of Teilhard de Chardin and Ramanuja. Cambridge University Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-0-521-38516-9.
  73. ^ R. Balasubramanian (2000). Advaita Vedānta. Munshiram Manoharlal. p. 9. ISBN 978-81-87586-04-3.
  74. ^ Jeaneane D. Fowler (2002). Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism. Sussex Academic Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-1-898723-94-3.
  75. ^ Anne Hunt Overzee (1992). The Body Divine: The Symbol of the Body in the Works of Teilhard de Chardin and Ramanuja. Cambridge University Press. pp. 63–85. ISBN 978-0-521-38516-9.
  76. ^ Julius Lipner (1986). The Face of Truth: A Study of Meaning and Metaphysics in the Vedantic Theology of Ramanuja. State University of New York Press. pp. 37–48. ISBN 978-0-88706-038-0.
  77. ^ Ayyangar, C. R. Sreenivasa (1908). The Life and Teachings of Sri Ramanujacharya. R. Venkateshwar.
  78. ^ Seshadri, K. (1998). Srivaishnavism and Social Change. K.P. Bagchi & Company. ISBN 978-81-7074-198-5.
  79. ^ Paniker, K. Ayyappa (1997). Medieval Indian Literature: Surveys and selections. Sahitya Akademi. ISBN 978-81-260-0365-5.
  80. ^ Rajagopalachariar, T. (1982). The Vaishnavite Reformers of India: Critical Sketches of Their Lives and Writings. A.D. Publications.
  81. ^ Jerry L. Walls (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology. Oxford University Press. pp. 182–183. ISBN 978-0-19-974248-6.
  82. ^ Brian A. Hatcher (2015). Hinduism in the Modern World. Routledge. p. 27. ISBN 978-1-135-04631-6.
  83. ^ a b c d e f Dalal 2010, p. 385.
  84. ^ Renganathan, L. (5 January 2012). "Rajagopuram — pride of Srirangam". The Hindu.
  85. ^ Vasudeva Rao (2002). Living Traditions in Contemporary Contexts: The Madhva Matha of Udupi. Orient Blackswan. pp. 33–45. ISBN 978-81-250-2297-8.
  86. ^ Stefan Pertz (2013), The Guru in Me - Critical Perspectives on Management, GRIN Verlag, ISBN 978-3638749251, pages 2-3
  87. ^ Joel Mlecko (1982), The Guru in Hindu Tradition Numen, Volume 29, Fasc. 1, pages 33-61
  88. ^ a b Jeffery D. Long (2011). Historical Dictionary of Hinduism. Scarecrow. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-8108-7960-7.
  89. ^ Vasudha Narayanan (2009). Hinduism. The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 50–51. ISBN 978-1-4358-5620-2.
  90. ^ Tamara I. Sears (2014). Worldly Gurus and Spiritual Kings: Architecture and Asceticism in Medieval India. Yale University Press. pp. 68–70, 121–122, 159–160. ISBN 978-0-300-19844-7.
  91. ^ a b Steven Paul Hopkins (2002). Singing the Body of God. Oxford University Press. pp. 71–74. ISBN 978-0-19-802930-4.
  92. ^ a b K.V. Raman (2003). Sri Varadarajaswami Temple, Kanchi: A Study of Its History, Art and Architecture. Abhinav Publications. pp. 137–138. ISBN 978-81-7017-026-6.
  93. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Dutta, Ranjeeta (2015). "Reading Community Identities and Traditions: The History and Representation of the Shrivaishnavas of South India". Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. 18 (1–2): 141–68. S2CID 161734042.
  94. ^ Gough 1965, p. 25.
  95. ^ Geoffrey Oddie (2013). Hindu and Christian in South-East India. Routledge. pp. 94 footnote 7. ISBN 978-1-136-77377-8. Quote: In this context, 'north' refers to the northern region of the Tamil country with its capital at Kanchipuram (a historical seat of Sanskrit learning) and 'south' refers to the Kaveri delta with its capital at Srirangam - one of the sacred bastions of Tamil culture."
  96. ^ Mumme 1987, pp. 257–265.
  97. ^ C. J. Bartley (2013). The Theology of Ramanuja: Realism and Religion. Routledge. pp. 1–4. ISBN 978-1-136-85306-7.
  98. ^ P. T. Narasimhachar (2001). The Hill Temple. Sahitya Akademi. pp. xviii. ISBN 978-81-260-0814-8.
  99. ^ Ramaswamy, Vijaya (1985), Textiles and weavers in medieval South India, Oxford University Press, p. 61, ISBN 978-0-19-561705-4, retrieved 17 April 2016
  100. ^ a b c d K.V., Raman (2003), Sri Varadarajaswami Temple, Kanchi: A Study of Its History, Art and Architecture, Abhinav Publications, pp. 132–133, ISBN 9788170170266, retrieved 16 April 2016
  101. ^ a b c Neeti M. Sadarangani (2004). Bhakti Poetry in Medieval India: Its Inception, Cultural Encounter and Impact. Sarup & Sons. pp. 19–20. ISBN 978-81-7625-436-6.
  102. ^ Roshen Dalal. Hinduism: An Alphabetical Guide. Penguin Books India, 2010. p. 385.
  103. ^ Gengnagel, Jörg; Hüsken, Ute; Raman, Srilata (2005). Words and Deeds: Hindu and Buddhist Rituals in South Asia. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 2005. p. 91. ISBN 9783447051521.
  104. ^ Young, Katherine (2021). Turbulent Transformations: Non-Brahmin Śrīvaiṣṇavas on Religion, Caste and Politics in Tamil Nadu. Orient BlackSwan. ISBN 978-81-949258-8-0.
  105. ^ Jagadeesan, N. (1977). History of Sri Vaishnavism in the Tamil Country: Post-Ramanuja. Koodal Publishers. Tirukkachchi Nambi and Pillai Uranga Villi Dasar, great names in Sri Vaishnava tradition, cannot be called Sri Vaishnavas because they were not Brahmins.
  106. ^ Madabhushini Narasimhacharya. Sri Ramanuja. Sahitya Akademi, 2004. p. 27.
  107. ^ Coward 2008, p. 141.
  108. ^ a b Thomas Manninezhath (1993). Harmony of Religions: Vedānta Siddhānta Samarasam of Tāyumānavar. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 35–. ISBN 978-81-208-1001-3.
  109. ^ a b "Tamil Nadu, Religious Condition under Vijaya Nagar Empire". Tamilnadu.ind.in. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  110. ^ Srinivasan & Mukherjee 1976.
  111. ^ Pg.66 The Indian historical review, Volume 17; Indian Council of Historical Research, Vikas Pub. House
  112. ^ Pg.65 The Indian historical review, Volume 17; Indian Council of Historical Research, Vikas Pub. House
  113. ^ "Swami Mudaliandan Thirumaligai". www.mudaliandan.com. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  114. ^ Pandey, Vraj Kumar (2007). Pg.86 Encyclopaedia of Indian philosophy, Volume 1, by Vraj Kumar Pandey, Anmol Publications. Anmol Publications. ISBN 9788126131129. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  115. ^ Subrahmanian, N.; Tamil̲An̲Pan̲; Jeyapragasam, S. (1976). Pg.108 Homage to a Historian:a festschrift – by N. Subrahmanian, Tamilanpan, S.Jeyapragasam, Dr. N. Subrahmanian 60th Birthday Celebration Committee, in association with Koodal Publishers. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  116. ^ Srinivasa Ramanujan Aiyangar; Bruce C. Berndt; Robert Alexander Rankin (2001). Ramanujan: Essays and Surveys. American Mathematical Soc. pp. 89–. ISBN 978-0-8218-2624-9.
  117. ^ D. C. V. Mallik (10 September 2000). "K. S. Krishnan and the Kodaikanal Observatory" (PDF). Current Science. 79 (5). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 August 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
  118. ^ Ram Godar (27 December 2013), Guruji B.K.S. Iyengar's 95th Birthday Celebrations, archived from the original on 14 December 2021, retrieved 9 April 2016
  119. ^ Parlato, Frank Jr. "People that Swami Vivekanand- Frank Parlato Jr". www.vivekananda.net. Archived from the original on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  120. ^ "Memoirs of European travel I". www.ramakrishnavivekananda.info. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  121. ^ "Complete_Works_of_Swami_Vivekananda_-_Vol_7" (PDF).
  122. ^ "Prolific Tamil writer Sujatha passes away". The Hindu. 28 February 2008. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  123. ^ "Ariyakudi" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  124. ^ "The first crossing". The Hindu. 14 January 2007. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  125. ^ "ARIYAKUDI". www.carnatica.net. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  126. ^ "Why was Iyengar Brahmin J Jayalalithaa buried instead of being cremated". DNA India.
  127. ^ a b T. V. Kuppuswamy (Prof.), Shripad Dattatraya Kulkarni (1966). History of Tamilakam. Darkness at horizon. Shri Bhagavan Vedavyasa Itihasa Samshodhana Mandira. p. 166.
  128. ^ Sociology of religion, Volume 1 – by Joachim Wach, University of Chicago press, 1944. 3 November 1958. p. 129. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  129. ^ Kabir, the apostle of Hindu-Muslim unity: interaction of Hindu-Muslim ideas in the formation of the bhakti movement with special reference to Kabīr, the bhakta – Muhammad Hedayetullah, Motilal Banarsidass publication, 1977. p. 107. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  130. ^ "Britannica Online Encyclopedia". Britannica.com. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  131. ^ "Astadasabhedanirnaya". Adityaprakashan.com. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  132. ^ a b Nisith Ranjan Ray (1993). Dimensions of National Integration: The Experiences and Lessons of Indian History. Punthi-Pustak & Institute of Historical Studies. p. 150. ISBN 978-81-85094-62-5.
  133. ^ a b The Indian Historical Review. Vol. 17. Vikas Publishing House. 1990. p. 65.
  134. ^ "Astadasabhedanirnaya". Adityaprakashan.com. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  135. ^ a b Students' Britannica India. p. 205. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  136. ^ Dharma (1 February 1996). Philosophy of Nārāyaṇīyam: Study, Text & Śloka Index. Nag Publishers. p. 199. ISBN 978-81-7081-337-8.
  137. ^ "Srimad Rahasya Traya Sara by Shri Vedanta Desika – under the subtopic Upaya Vibhaga Adhikara". munitrayam.org. Archived from the original on 16 March 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  138. ^ Modern India and the Indians, by M.Monier Williams. 26 July 2001. p. 194. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  139. ^ Wach, Joachim (11 June 1991). Pg.129 Sociology of religion, Volume 1 – by Joachim Wach, University of Chicago press, 1944. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226867083. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  140. ^ Hedayetullah, Muhammad (1977). Pg.107 Kabir, the apostle of Hindu-Muslim unity: interaction of Hindu-Muslim ideas in the formation of the bhakti movement with special reference to Kabīr, the bhakta – Muhammad Hedayetullah, Motilal Banarsidass publication, 1977. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 9788120806115. Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  141. ^ Tirupati Balaji was a Buddhist shrine, Sanjivan Publications, 1991. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  142. ^ "Vadakalai Srivaishnava Festivals' Calendar – The source mentions Pancharatra & Munitraya Krishna Jayantis celebrated by Ahobila Mutt & Andavan Ashrams respectively". Trsiyengar.com. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  143. ^ "Ahobila Mutt's Balaji Mandir Pune, Calendar – The calendar mentions Ahobila Mutt disciples celebrating Krishna Jayanti as "Pancharatra Sri Jayanti"". Sribalajimandirpune.com. Archived from the original on 9 October 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  144. ^ "Sri Krishna & Janmashtami – Essence of Srivaishnava Practices". Trsiyengar.com. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  145. ^ The Cultural Heritage of India: Sri Ramakrishna centenary memorial, published by – Sri Ramakrishna centenary committee. 16 July 2009. p. 1000. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  146. ^ Rāmānuja sampradāya in Gujarat:a historical perspective. Somaiya Publications. p. 31. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  147. ^ Srivaishnavism and social change – by K.seshadri, K.P.Bagchi & co publishers. p. 82. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  148. ^ The Cultural Heritage of India:The Religious. Ramakrishna Mission, Institute of Culture. 1956. p. 182.
  149. ^ "Sri Parakala Matham > Sri Matham > History".
  150. ^ Studies in history, Volume 1, Issue 1; Jawaharlal Nehru University. Centre for Historical Studies. Sage. 1979. p. 14. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  151. ^ Gazetteer of South India, Volume 2 – By W. Francis, Mittal Publications. p. 561. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  152. ^ Indian philosophy & culture, Volumes 3–4; Vrindāvan (India) Institute of Oriental Philosophy, Vaishnava Research Institute, Vrindāban, India. 1 January 1984. p. 33. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  153. ^ Ontological and morphological concepts of Lord Sri Chaitanya and his mission, Volume 1; Bhakti Vilās Tīrtha Goswāmi Maharāj, Navadwīpa Dhām Prachārini Sabha; Pub' – Sree Gaudiya Math, 1994. 2 October 2009. p. 240. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  154. ^ Studies in social history: modern India; O. P. Bhatnagar, India. University Grants Commission, University of Allahabad. Dept. of Modern Indian History; St. Paul's Press Training School, 1964. 1 January 2006. p. 129. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  155. ^ "The Life of Srila Gopala Bhatta Goswami; His Vadakalai origin is mentioned in the article, where Vadakalai is spelled as "Badagalai"(Some in Northern India often substitute the alphabet V with B)". Prabhupadanugas.eu. 22 January 2011. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  156. ^ "TimesContent – Photo of Rajagopalachari – He wears the Vadakalai Tilak on his forehead". Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  157. ^ Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya (1896). Hindu Castes and Sects: An Exposition on the Origins of Hindu caste system. Thacker, Spink & Co. p. 78.
  158. ^ Jawaharlal Memorial Fund (1972). Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru. Orient Longman. p. 440.
  159. ^ "A Vedic scholar enters his 100th year". The Hindu. India. 30 March 2007. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
  160. ^ "ReelshowInt MAG". Mag.reelshowint.com. 15 June 2010. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 20 November 2011.

Bibliography

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Dictionary of Hindu Lore and Legend (ISBN 0-500-51088-1) by Anna Dallapiccola
  • The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual (Univ of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, U.S.A. 1 January 1994), by Vasudha Narayanan
  • Understanding Hinduism, (ISBN 1844832015), by Vasudha Narayanan
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sri_Vaishnavism&oldid=1258032273"