Administrative backlog
Reports
- UNIpritcham (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2600:6C50:7A7F:2333:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – Large amount of unconstructive edits, primarily adding ordinals to dates. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- James T Butcher III (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Theroadislong (talk) 20:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Confusing us with LinkedIn is a common mistake. A block at this point would be a bit harsh. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- 82.16.109.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Rag'n'Bone Man (diff): vandalism after final warning. LaffyTaffer (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
- List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Syrian civil war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Per WP:GS/SCW&ISIL, New created IP accounts disruptive editing because of current events taking place Mr.User200 (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 20:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Benison (Beni · talk) 13:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There are additional and removal of unsourced information from this article from an IP. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Blatant WP:FORUM violations. Borgenland (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The other day I requested protection but was denied because there was not a recent enough history of vandalism. Anon has been back twice more since then, trying to remove the same line she has been trying to take out for years against consensus. The consensus process has been explained to anon repeatedly, but she is WP:NOTGETTINGIT. Over and over again, anon removes the line and then it is restored again. Restricting this to autoconfirmed editors would solve this problem. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 17:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Needless to say, the rent is too damn high! El_C 20:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Pretty immediately after the full lock ended, IPs have returned to edit war. I think a longer duration of protection is warranted at this point; however, some IPs have edited productively which is why I think pending changes protection might be a better temporary solution. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent addition of POV material, edit warring to an extent. Edit War Checker flashes red. EF5 17:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:10, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This need to be protected prior to the start of the event to prevent any weeaboos ruined the editing of the winners list. VernardoLau (talk) 18:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pages are not protected preemptively. ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 18:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Guess I shall wait till the end of the event before I could request the protection since early protection don't work out here. VernardoLau (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: high vandalism amid geopolitical conflict AstronomyMaster1 (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 18:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-Protection: Constant IP vandalism about representation. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequently vandalised by IP editors. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 21:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason:Article is in a poorly written state and barely gets meaningful contributions since it was last protected. No signs of disruptive editing for a long time either.Axedd (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Axedd: Is the long-term abuser that caused the article to be ECP'd still active on other articles? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- The case page is not a reliable indicator of if an LTA is active or not, especially if they're reveling in the attention. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Yamaguchi先生 --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Axedd for being in touch and Jéské for the ping. Axedd, you are already able to edit this article in the currently protected state. For context, there have been over 18 different page protections applied over the years due to long term abuse, block evasion, and persistent disruption in general. In light of this, was there any specific reason that you're looking to see this page unprotected? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection: Requesting a reduction to indef WP:ECP, per conversation on talk page of imposing administrator. Move protection can remain at indef sysop. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll have to disagree. Just look at the page history. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:28, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Eric dying in 2014. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Jonghyun dying in 2017. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should at least be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The season is completed. 2A02:C7C:A01:3E00:6416:9E81:7DAB:2ECD (talk) 13:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The protection expires in less than two weeks. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
- The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Original = "Leo Max Frank (April 17, 1884 – August 17, 1915) was an American lynching victim convicted in 1913" After= "Leo Max Frank (April 17, 1884 – August 17, 1915) was an Jewish-American lynching victim convicted in 1913" Anthonys210 (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done – Please read MOS:ETHNICITY, in particular the Isaak Asimov example. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
During the temporary stint granted as autopatrolled, I have created over 100 pages following the suggestions of the admin. Have been consistently adding relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them. Have also started using Rater and StubSorter. Trying to strengthen myself with Wikipedia's core content policies by regular reading. Requesting extension... Davidindia (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have created 40 articles out of which 2 are deleted with a total edits of 2680, as of now. I also found myself listed in Wikipedia:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege. I promise, it'll be worth if I'm given the Autopatrolled privilege. Thanks, Hoping for a positive response. Taabii (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Created 69 articles, new creations do not appear to require patrolling. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
I, Indonesiainfo24, hereby request to be granted the Autopatrolled status on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the creation and maintenance of articles on Wikipedia, and I always strive to adhere to the guidelines and policies in place, including neutrality, verifiability, and article quality standards. The reasons I am requesting this status are as follows:
I hope my request will be considered, and I am committed to continuing my contributions in a manner that aligns with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Thank you for your attention and the opportunity. Sincerely, Indonesiainfo24 it has begun... 13:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
I have created 400+ well-sourced articles on military, history, literature, politics, and academia, including recent BLPs. I believe i meet the criteria for autopatrolled rights. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I need to distribute barnstars for the November 2024 Unreferenced article Backlog drive and was advised that this was the best way to do it. (See discussion on Backlog drive Talk page.) Cielquiparle (talk) 04:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Requesting a swap of my AWB perms to User:Synorem (AWB). This is a legitimate alternate account specifically for AWB tasks as to prevent edit count inflation on my main account. Synorem (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Requesting AWB rights for an account created specifically for semi-automatic edits. (Here are my AWB edits on this account to date.) Remsense ‥ 论 04:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason. I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
I want to be a confirmed Wikipedia user because I would like to share my experiences with different kinds of things. For example "Minecraft" as a player i would like to add my experiences and report problems like bugs. Theteacher reference (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Legitimate alternate account used for improving articles via WP:AWB. Synorem (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
Vulcan would like to be able to rename files and to help others in doing so. Already have similar role in Commons. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily (yes, mistakenly got a copyright report for an article) focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh. Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to become an NPR to help reduce the work, I regularly intervene on drafts and edit them to format them and put banners or comments to advise the creator on the steps to follow so that this draft becomes eligible, in the case that it is possible. I know the rules of Wikipedia and the essential points determining if an article is eligible or not. I see drafts being submitted but they are clearly not ready to be accepted and unfortunately I can't do anything at this time. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello I'm TyphoonAmpil. I'm meet all minimum requirements. I'm over 45+ AfC reviews and 5+ Accepted drafts. I'm adding tags {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} tags. I'm created 4 articles named Tropical Storm Maria (2024), Typhoon Ampil (2024), Typhoon Shanshan (2024), Typhoon Krathon. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedian, I am requesting for New Page Reviewer rights to enhance my contributions to Wikipedia. With major experience in article creation, editing, and compliance to Wikipedia’s guidelines, I am passionate to help ensure new pages meet quality standards. I am committed to improving the Wikipedia community and would greatly appreciate your consideration. Thank you for your time! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I'd love to help out with the backlog. I have around ~40 AfD !votes, and I'm usually one of the first votes and always use strong guideline-backed reasoning. I've only had 1 AfD in the "red" cell of AfD Stats, that was a bio of a person from a non-English speaking country, and I tried to find sources in my WP:BEFORE, but nothing come up, and then another user more familiar with that country was able to dig something up so I withdrew (I don't think it should count as a black mark against me). I've also reviewed a lot of AfC submissions (a good amount of them sadly don't show in the AfC tool as they were later deleted, but there's still a decent chunk in there), and I almost always provide personalized advice backed with good reasoning when declining. You can find my CSD log here (n. 10, 100% success): User:MolecularPilot/CSD_Log, and I've also created 5 articles (see my user page), 4 of which are B class. Thanks for your time! :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help contribute reduce the large backlog of unreviewed new pages. I've been an active AFC reviewer for a while. I've contributed to and created dozens of articles that are still live to date. ANUwrites 06:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
After I was granted the right some weeks ago, I have been reviewing new articles and since it expires in 6 days, I would like to request for an extension Tesleemah (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozu • teacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |