Talk:2011 census of India

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 23 October 2023

Census website on blacklist

edit

I cannot add any links for census2011.co.in because it is listed in Wikipedia's blacklist. Can anyone remove? NagalimNE (talk) 07:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I see a lot of articles using this website as a citation now. Has the blacklisting changed? If so, why? Can someone {{help}} me out please? Tanyasingh (talk) 10:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tanyasingh, "a lot of articles"? Links please. Cabayi (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Tanyasingh and Cabayi: MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/April 2020 § census2011.co.in, the most recent whitelisting request, was declined as not being the official census data. The earliest blacklisting request I could find is under MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/May 2019 § onefivenine.com. Perhaps the results of a census2011.co.in     query were added before May 2019. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that deep research, @Rotideypoc41352: !! @NagalimNE:, these articles That's one too many :|  : Tanyasingh (talk) 05:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Pasting deleted material from another article

edit

I've just deleted the following material from the page Baháʼí Faith in India as a violation of WP:SYNTH. However it may be useful for this page.

The census has been under some criticism and scholars regularly use corrections.[1][2]

References

  1. ^ How reliable are India's official statistics?, by Ankush Agrawal, IEG, and Vikas Kumar, EastAsiaForum.org, 6 April 2012
  2. ^ Sharada Srinivasan; Arjun Singh Bedi (18 September 2008). "Daughter Elimination in Tamil Nadu, India: A Tale of Two Ratios". The Journal of Development Studies. 44 (7): 961–990. doi:10.1080/00220380802150755. ISSN 1743-9140. S2CID 154359140. The civil registration system which in principle should be able to provide district level figures on birth, death, infant mortality and other vital events is not complete and far from reliable."… "In the Indian context, in the absence of a complete civil registration system…

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1879 population census in Bosnia and Herzegovina which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 October 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC) – robertsky (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply



– Per consensus reached at Talk:2020_United_States_census/Archive_1#Requested_move_16_November_2020 that "census" is a common noun and should be lowercase. This move would put these articles in line with other similar articles such as 1950 United States census, 2021 Canadian census, and 1841 census of Ireland. As always, feel free to suggest any that I may have missed. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.