Talk:3 Words (song)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. 12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 19:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

---

3 Words (Cheryl Cole song) → 3 Words (song) — - No need for the extra disambiguisation, only this song has this name. --12345abcxyz20082009 (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Artwork

Hey, if the current artwork displayed official?! If so, could someone provide me with a source XD Theog101 (talk) 17:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Probably not, the person who uploaded it didn't specify a source, so I'm going to tag it as unsourced. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :D Theog101 (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Alternative video

There is alternative video, that is uploaded to Cheryl's Vevo page. link It should be mentioned in article.--SveroH (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Even Worse, the homepage of Haycock (vincenthaycock.com) shows only the other version of the video, so I guess the version described here is NOT done by him. What's the source that identifies him as connected to this video? And who did the other video? Are they both done by him? Cisz Helion (talk) 03:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC) - Turns out someone fixed the bit about the videos now, and even managed to find the director for the second version. Great job.--Cisz Helion (talk) 16:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

it says that it is "the making of", but I've seen some tv stations playing this video--SveroH (talk) 20:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:3 Words (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 23:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Issues Part 1(Resolved)

Opening: ""3 Words" is a song by British recording artist Cheryl Cole (of Girls Aloud) and, is both the opening and title song from debut studio album." Rewrite to say: "3 Words" is a song by British recording artist Cheryl Cole (of Girls Aloud). The song is both the opening and title song from her debut studio album, 3 Words (album).  Done The uptempo synth and dance music-inspired pop song was written by Cole, George Pajon and will.i.am; the latter of also features on and, produced the song. It was cited by Cole as her favourite song from the album for being different to what people expected. Where ihave in bold needs to be re-written, it doesnt quite make sense.  Done Musical composition and style: "3 Words" is a uptempo synthpop,[1] dance music[2] pop song[3] featuring vocals from and produced by will.i.am who also wrote the track alongside Cole and George Pajon. Rewrite to say ..... "3 Words" is an uptempo synthpop,[1] dance music[2] pop song[3]. The song was written by Cole, alongside George Pajon and will.i.am who produced the song and also features in the song. Something like that, couldnt quite figure out a great wording.  Done Noticeably missing is the standard "verse-chorus-verse song structure"[3], and makes use of a sparse but complex chord progression of C♯ m–G♯ m–C♯–A major/C♯ ..... Missing a word somewhere.  Done The production featuring features loops of acoustic guitar[5] with a piano melody[6] to form an "atmospheric love song"[7] in the vocal range of G♯3 to B4.[4] Critics stated that the "sophisticated love song"[8] is difficult to class by genre because it is it's "unconventional", something which<no comma> Cole agreed when she said, "[its] totally different from anything I've done [with Girls Aloud] or liked before". Incorrect commas.  Done The industry noted how it was "unlike many things currently [at that time] on radio or being released".[6] The industry? Everyone single person noted this? lol. Needs rewritten.  Done Other: Dab links. Please see here for how to correct  Done

Issues Part 2(Resolved)

Critical Reception: "David Balls of Digital Spy writes, [...]" Wrote because its past tense.  Done "Louise McCudden of Inthenews.co.uk, however, argues that although "her voice sounds pleasant" Argued as its past tense.  Done Music Video: Background and Concept: "The first The music video was a viral verson version directed by Vincent Haycock in the week begining beginning 19 October 2009". Spelling and other mistakes, removed/replace where ive striked out.  Done "The video was described as being distinctly different to that of previous single "Fight for This Love",[34] drawing comparisons with to Madonna[35] and Lady Gaga.[36] " To not with  Done Music Video Synopsis: "The video begins with Cole sat sitting alongside will.i.am, wearing a "Lady Gaga-inspired platinum blonde wig" .... Incorrect tense. In these the early scenes she "swaps her bronzed tan for alabaster skin, smokey eyes and pale lipstick". ... incorrect tense both issues have been fixed. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Reception: I would start with a line indicating the videos reception which by scanning seems to be mixed or negative. Ill let you decide which one it is. I would say mixed to negative. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me issue resolved. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Chart Performance: Needs to be rewritten. Needs expansion as it currently is basically listing the charts sections. re-write complete --Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC) "A day before its digital release[14] and two days before its CD release[15] the single climbed to number fourteen[16] although it and then in first week of 2010 it would go on to peak at number four.[17]"..... huh? lol. needs a re-write. fixed... sorry! --Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC) "It was more successful than fellow X Factor judge Dannii Minogue's second single "Success", which reached number eleven in 1991[20] and Cole's protege, Alexandra Burke's second single "Broken Heels" which peaked at number eight.[21]" Not needed, its fluff. removed, i thought it was a good comparison but on second thoughts it could be seen as fancruft --Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

References(Resolved)

Refs: Inconsistent referencing dates. Eg:2009-10-23 and 17 July 2010. Please choose one or the other. ref [20] → Error in heading "Smith, Lizzie date=26 Jan. 2010" ref [35] → Needs an accessdate ref [37] → [39] You have an extra period after Apple Inc ref [42] → Needs an accessdate ref [43] → Needs an accessdate ref [44] → Needs formatted and replaced with proper chart archive ref [45] → Needs an accessdate ref [46] → Needs an accessdate ref [48] → Needs an accessdate ref [49] → For some reason everything is in italics with an extra . after apple inc ref [50] → [54] You have an extra period after Apple Inc all issues fixed. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Refs: Inconsistent referencing dates. Eg:2009-10-23 and 17 July 2010. Please choose one or the other. ref [13] → Remove italics. ref [14] + [15] → Remove italics. ref [27] → Remove italics. ref [45] → [48] Remove italics. ref [57] → [62] Remove italics. could not find any instances of inconsistant dates, above italics issues fixed. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Prose (Complete)

:GA review (see here for criteria) It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Overall: Pass/Fail: - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me -

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 3 Words (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101113000303/http://aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-dance-singles-2010.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-dance-singles-2010.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 3 Words (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722053056/http://www.fimi.it/dett_ddmercato.php?id=73 to http://www.fimi.it/dett_ddmercato.php?id=73

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)