Talk:Aaron Hertzman

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 22:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Aaron Hertzman paid $25 to have a team in the National Football League? Source: PFRA
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jack Biddle (politician)

Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Aaron Hertzman; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Pending
Overall: Hook is straightforward, interesting, and cited; I just think that National Football League should be linked. SounderBruce 08:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

• @SounderBruce: Reviewed QPQ. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Good to go. SounderBruce 17:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Aaron Hertzman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 19:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 20:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Will review this soon. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Added GM cat.
• Removed American footbal executives cat. Already in subcats.
• Added WW1 cat.
• Added WWII cat.
• Does he not have a PFR exec profile? I couldn't find anything.
• I was thinking about asking you to expand the lead but I don't really think there's anything else to say that wouldn't be undue weight.
• Do you know what the Radcliffe Company is?

I think that's everything. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:51, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

• @WikiOriginal-9: Unsure of what else to add to the lead as well – It seems PFR generally doesn't give profiles to defunct team managers (maybe I should contact them to fix it...). As for the Radcliffe Company, I see mentions of a "Radcliffe Land Company" in Kentucky around that time, but I don't see anything connecting him to it (besides the obit, which only states 'he was secretary of Radcliffe Co.'). Thoughts? BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

  I made a slight copy edit to the lead. Your responses make sense. That's everything. Passing the article. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.