Talk:Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano
Latest comment: 3 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that two kidnapped activists (pictured) were released after they randomly stated that they were kidnapped?
- Source: ABS-CBN Al-Jazeera Rappler
Created by Ryomaandres (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
01:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC).
- Not a review, but the hook could draw more attention with careful omission. How about ALT1: ... the Filipino government tried forcing two kidnapped activists to confess to being rebels at a press conference, but they had other plans? Bremps... 20:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pretty good, I'll accept that one.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
07:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC).- @TheNuggeteer: Please provide a QPQ, or this may be closed as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Did the QPQ.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗
23:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Did the QPQ.
- @TheNuggeteer: Please provide a QPQ, or this may be closed as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Pretty good, I'll accept that one.
- Full review needed now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Oh that's cheeky. I love this. Not entirely keen on the pic for 100px, given that it's really busy. Prefer ALT1, though it might get some flack at ERRORS for being in a non-encyclopedic voice. ALT0 misuses "randomly" and could probably use some massaging. AGF on the paywalled sources - was able to confirm most things. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)