Talk:Aitraaz

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aitraaz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110121000707/http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=210&catName=MjAwNA== to http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=210&catName=MjAwNA==
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529050507/http://www.shemaroo.com:80/shopping/search_result.asp? to http://www.shemaroo.com/shopping/search_result.asp#sf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129144753/http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/birthday-blast-priyanka-chopra-s-top-30-moments-in-showbiz/article1-890611.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Birthday-blast-Priyanka-Chopra-s-Top-30-moments-in-showbiz/Article1-890611.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Clarity

I did a bit of copy edit. A couple notes:

• The plot and reception sections mention "sexual harassment" but the production section mentions "rape". There should be some consistency here, or the Production section should explain why the script was changed from rape to sexual harassment.
• The film opened to excellent occupancy in metros What is meant by "metros"? The word has many possible uses.

It'd be great if those points could be clarified. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Sources

• Filmfare, review --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 09:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)