Talk:Anjaana Anjaani

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anjaana Anjaani/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pavanjandhyala (talk · contribs) 06:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

I am reviewing this nomination. Requesting the nominator to be available until the process ends. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Lead

• "Wanting to make an unusual romance film, Anand struggled to find new ideas while he was writing." -- unconventional would be a better term.

Plot

• Is there any reason why Akash wants to obtain a loan? If yes, please mention it.
• "With 20 days left before their deadline, they decide to fulfil their unrealized wishes and begin a journey together." -- it is fulfill not fulfil. And, being an Indian article, it is suggested you use British English and hence change unrealized to unrealised.
• "After she is discharged, Akash realizes his love for her, and tries everything to make her happy." -- Again "realizes" to "realises".

Production

• "Siddharth knows the grammar of Hindi cinema. I like the way he goes the distance to get things done for his film. Writing a screenplay can also be a lonely process like writing a novel, but along the way when others get involved, it becomes a fun collaborative effort." -- In this whole quote, the line from "Writing a screenplay..." is enough from an encyclopaedia point of view. The former statements might seem unencyclopaedic for many.
• "It was announced that Sajid Nadiadwala would produce the film as he was highly impressed by the script." -- When you are using the words "It was announced", please do make sure the timeline is specified.
• "Manish Malhotra designed Copra's clothes" -- costumes? And that's Chopra not Copra.
• "The setting of the film required filming in winter during the festive season of Christmas leading up to New Year's Eve." -- This was already mentioned above. Why repeat it again?
• "He chose New York city for Kapoor's character, and Wall Street for Akash's." -- This line is giving an impression that Kapoor's character and Akash are different. Please rephrase it.
• Mention the year for When Harry Met Sally.
• Better mention Film City as Film City, Mumbai.

Release

• Mention of stills, teaser and trailer is something WP:FILMMARKETING is against.

Well actually, just listing them is not allowed but I have used them to show that the stills and teasers caused people's interest in the film. It is allowed. Reactions to the trailers, stills and posters are very much allowed. This is what I do in all my articles. I present them as as tool for evoking interest from media, audiences and critics. This is marketing.Krish | Talk 15:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

More to come... Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

I've settled the spelling issues with this script. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

@Pavanjandhyala: Done.Krish | Talk 15:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

• Mentioning Enthiran as a science fiction film is enough. Using spectacle is somewhat POV pushing.
• Images in Production section lack alt text.

References

• Link Bollywood Hungama in ref 2
• Link The Hindu in ref 9
• Link Mid Day in ref 12
• Link TOI in ref 15
• Ref 19 lacks publisher
• Link Sify in ref 26
• Link CNN-News18 in ref 30
• Link NDTV in ref 31; delink in ref 47
• Link DNA in ref 32; use full name
• Link Amazon in 38
• Link the reviewers in the refs allotted to the reviews
• Delink The Indian Express in ref 52; fix this link, as it shows a change of sub domain.

Let me know once all the comments are duly addressed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

@Pavanjandhyala: DoneKrish | Talk 17:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)