Talk:Armenia–Serbia relations
Armenia–Serbia relations was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 23, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armenia–Serbia relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Armenia–Serbia relations/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 11:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Checklist
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit- Some initial comments
- Stability and images look good.
- On references, some of your short cites don't actually link to long cites.
- Lede
- Looks good, but the first sentence is a little awkward. I'll try to figure out a better option.
- History
- "After the Ottomans conquered Belgrade, they destroyed the city's Armenian and Jewish cemeteries." This could use a citation.
@AnulBanul: I see you haven't edited in a while. Are you still active? If not, we should close this nomination and reopen when you return to active editing. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC) After 7 days without response from the nominator (or any eidts by him whatsoever,) I'll have to fail this. It's not bad though, and I'd encourage renomination later on. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Armenia–Serbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402095409/http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Reportaza/178794/Jermeni-su--gradili-srpske-manastire- to http://www.blic.rs/Vesti/Reportaza/178794/Jermeni-su--gradili-srpske-manastire-
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150128063201/http://www.zemungrad.rs/zemun-crkve.html to http://www.zemungrad.rs/zemun-crkve.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)