Talk:Asmara Moerni

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Asmara Moerni/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 14:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• In the lead you seem to assert that the film is certainly lost but in the lower section you say "The film is likely lost" which confuses me a little. Perhaps say that the film is considered to be lost in both?
  • Fixed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
• No imdb entry on the film?
  • None that I could find. These early Indonesian films don't have much of a presence on the Western databases. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Makes you wonder how many notable films are missing for other non Anglo countries on there!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• filmindonesia.or.id I gather is a reliable source?
  • Short answer: Yes, as a digitalization of Kristanto's Katalog Film Indonesia. Longer answer at Template:Did you know nominations/Panggilan Darah. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes I thought it would be fine, I'm just trying to be picky on an article which is as sound as a pound!!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• A novelisation was later published by the Yogyakarta-based Kolff-Buning. Do you have the year of publication?
  • Yes, done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
• Perhaps you could say "production house Tan's Film" as by itself it sort of looks like it is referring to the film of a director!
  • Alright, done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Very difficult to find any fault with this... It is technically sound and I'd imagine that you've already done well to find so much on a 1941 Indonesian film.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Asmara Moerni. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://filmindonesia.or.id/movie/title/lf-a012-41-485450_asmara-moerni
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://filmindonesia.or.id/movie/name/nmp4b99ab8e9a14c_djoewariah
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.prioritasnews.com/2012/02/20/menyelundup-untuk-kemakmuran-republik/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140111012531/http://niod.x-cago.com/maleise_kranten/article.do?code=Niod091&date=19451107&id=091-19451107-004021&words=Asmara+Moerni+asmara+moerni to http://niod.x-cago.com/maleise_kranten/article.do?code=Niod091&date=19451107&id=091-19451107-004021&words=Asmara+Moerni+asmara+moerni
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.suaramerdeka.com/harian/0711/10/nas09.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://filmindonesia.or.id/movie/name/nmp4b9bad38c19b5_rd-ariffien
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://filmindonesia.or.id/movie/name/nmp4b99aad530eea_Saeroen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Fire at Produksi Film Negara's warehouse. 1952 or 1953

On this article and on other articles of the Union Films series featured topic one can read the following: "a fire destroyed much of Produksi Film Negara's warehouse in 1952." The source is Biran 2012, p. 291. However, Christopher A. Woodrich, Ekranisasi Awal: Bringing Novels to The Silver Screen in The Dutch East Indies (Gadja Mada University Press 2018) at p. 44 reports that "In 1953, a warehouse fire at Produksi Film Negara destroyed numerous master copies." So is it 1952 or 1953? Apparently also Woodrich is relying on Biran 2012, p. 291. I was wondering, given that this and the others are featured articles - is there any way to check the book by Biran and verify the information? I've done a bit of research online myself but unfortunately with no success. Gitz6666 (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)