Talk:Ban Hyo-jin

Latest comment: 13 days ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that although sport shooter Ban Hyo-jin attended Olympic trials "just to gain some competition experience", she qualified for the Olympics and went on to win a gold medal?
  • Source: YNA ("Ban, now 16, entered the Olympic trials just to gain some competition experience. Her initial objective was to compete against some veteran shooters this year and then push for a spot on the national team for the 2025 season. But Ban found herself in the lead after three out of five rounds in the trials. Suddenly, an Olympic spot was within grasp.") / Straits Times ("Compatriot Huang Yuting, however, was denied the same feat by South Korean Ban Hyo-jin, who won the women's competition by beating the Chinese via a shoot-off. Ban also become the youngest female Olympic shooting champion at 16 and the teenaged trio's sparkling form in Paris offered a glimpse into the future of rifle shooting.")
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 228 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   Prose at 2108 B and seven days old at nom day. Earwig has 30.6% in one ref but it's generally quotes and everything else hovers at 2%. @BeanieFan11: There's some refbombing in the last two sentences (I only needed ref 10 and ref 14/15 to verify the last two sentences respectively) and ref 1 could be moved into the early life section, but consider these optional to DYK. Article is overall good. ミラP@Miraclepine 17:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply