Talk:Battle of Punta Gruesa
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merging
editI don't think this article should be joined with the related to Iquique, since there were two separated actions fought on the same day.
201.239.90.48 (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- I Agree, this is a separate and independent action. Arquitecto Naval (talk) 04:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Done I agree and have removed the tag. Ruodyssey (talk) 05:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
aftermath
editthe remark about the loss of the wooden ship is misplaced since that happened during the engagement at iquique. It is misleading in the context of this article that has been deliberately separated from the iquique article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dietermontanez (talk • contribs) 17:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Punta Gruesa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305234724/http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090716/pags/20090716172641.html to http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090716/pags/20090716172641.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)