Talk:Black Narcissus

Untitled

I moved the content from Black Narcissus (1947 movie) here. There is no page for the plant of the same name, so there's no need to disambiguate (yet). Jihg 11:45, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

If there was, the "1947" would still have been unnecessary. -- Beardo 00:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Historical context

I removed this:

Black Narcissus was released only a few months before India achieved independence in August 1947. Film critic David Kehr has pointed out that the final images of the film, as the nuns abandon the Himalayas and process down the mountain, could have been interpreted by British viewers in 1947 as "a last farewell to their fading empire"; he points out that it is not an image of defeat "but of a respectful, rational retreat from something that England never owned and never understood". (ref David Kehr, 'Black Narcissus', The Criterion Collection official website.)

The first problem I have here is that, apart from his involvement in a review of this film for the Criterion Collection, I've no idea who this fellow is. Apart from that, his statement that the film was released very close to Independence day is correct, and his opinion arguable. This brings me to the point: if this is to be restored, the term "points out", which occurs twice in the removed section, should be softened to "he suggests that..." or something similar. It is a fact that the film was made and released close to Independence. It is an opinion that the film is an allegory for the end of empire. It is an opinion that it could have been interpreted as "a respectful, rational retreat from something that England never owned and never understood". --Tony Sidaway 21:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

At the end of the article, it says "Dave Kehr’s film criticism has appeared in many anthologies and publications including The New York Times, Premiere, and Entertainment Weekly. He is also a contributing editor at Film Comment." I personally found the connection to the end of empire illuminating, but I agree that "points out" should be softened to "suggests". Cop 663 (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Whilst I'd personally like to see more evidence on this fellow's credentials, I think we're otherwise in agreement. --Tony Sidaway 23:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

He's a film critic with a lengthy career; see here. Film Comment is a major academic journal. The Criterion website usually has essays by major scholars, so the fact that they chose this guy suggests that he has some notability. Cop 663 (talk) 23:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Let's set my misgivings aside. With changes as stipulated above, I think the section is okay. --Tony Sidaway 23:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Although you should remember that it was based on a book written in 1939. Although looking at it with the benefit of hindsight it can be said to reference Indian independence I don't think that the author of the book or the film-makers had that at the forefront of their minds. Rumer Godden was well aware of the burgeoning independence movement and generally supported it. Powell and Pressburger would have been even more aware of it. But the story is more just about people that don't fit in and could be applied to many situations -- SteveCrook (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Kehr isn't making any claims of intentionality, he's just saying it could have been seen that way by audiences in 1947 given the events of that year. Cop 663 (talk) 01:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

It is very ironic that a film about people that don't fit in does such a horrendously bad job at presenting Indian people and culture. It is as if the filmmakers themselves did not fit in. I doubt that was the intent of the filmmakers, but it does illustrate how people with the best of intentions can misunderstand and misinterpret other cultures. --☑ SamuelWantman 06:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

DVD & Blu-Ray

What's a good way to present all the information about the many various DVD & Blu-Ray (and video) releases? There's a lot of information to be included for each one. For instance: Country=UK; Release Date=26 Sep 2005; Publisher=Network; Storage format=DVD; Video format=PAL; Restrictions=Region 2; and then listing all the extras. I know of 8 different releases on DVD & Blu-Ray. They all have different values for all of those things mentioned. I thought about putting them into a table, but that doesn't leave much room for all the extras. Are there any examples of how it might be done? -- SteveCrook (talk) 10:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Anglican nuns?

The article states that these are "Anglican nuns". I don't recall that ever being made explicit in the film, and I wasn't even aware that there were such things. I should have thought it more probable that they were Roman Catholics. JH (talk page) 17:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Just because you've never heard of something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist... [1] Check out p.66 [2]—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cop 663 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I tried to move some data to the info box but it doesn't show.

| production design = Alfred Junge | costume design = Hein Heckroth | special effects = W. Percy Day, Peter Ellenshaw I deleted a separate paragraph listing the crew members and moved the above 3 to the info box. Will someone please let me know what I'm doing wrong? --Salimi (talk) 15:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

The Infobox film doesn't have any categories for designers. It only recognises predetermined job descriptions -- SteveCrook (talk) 23:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Got it. All your changes seem appropriate. Good teamwork. Salimi (talk) 11:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Critical response

"given that it is famous for the fact that no part of it was shot on location: it was shot entirely in English studios with a few outdoor scenes in some nearby gardens." So it was shot entirely in the studio, apart from the scenes which were shot on location  :) -- SteveCrook (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Who is being quoted

There's a quotation starting "The suggestions continually hover on the brink of hyperbole. ...", but who is being quoted? -- SteveCrook (talk) 11:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Marina Warner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.3.89 (talk) 22:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Black Narcissus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403044003/http://www.dvdbeaver.com:80/film/DVDReview2/blacknarcissus.htm to http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDReview2/blacknarcissus.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Removed made-up detail

“...the nuns, each of whom had a love affair in her youth that ended tragically and made her choose a nun's life.” I removed this. We know the complete background of only Kerr's character, and fragments of a couple more. Goochelaar (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)