Talk:Black Panther (film)

Latest comment: 18 hours ago by Adamstom.97 in topic Undefined footnote
Good articleBlack Panther (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 10, 2018Good article nomineeListed
July 20, 2019Good article reassessmentDelisted
November 18, 2019Good topic removal candidateDemoted
December 15, 2019Peer reviewReviewed
April 26, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 3, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Wesley Snipes had been interested in portraying the Black Panther in film for more than 20 years, before Marvel Studios officially announced Black Panther in 2014 with Chadwick Boseman in the role?
Current status: Good article

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2023

edit

the box office should be changed from 1.350 billion dollars to 1.349 billion dollars Lmnopw (talk) 11:57, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done $1,349,926,083 round to 1.350 bn. Indagate (talk) 12:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ike and Kevin feud. Chadwick's cancer

edit

1. Many movie news outlets have reported on Marvel CEO Ike Perlmutter not wanting to make BP movie, thinking it'd flop, and how much Kevin Feige struggled until BP was greenlit. No info on that in the article 2. Chadwick was already diagnosed with cancer when production on this film began, but it also isn't in the article. Can someone find trustworthy webpages and add aforementioned info into the article? Gevorg89 (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Missing data from RottenTomatoes

edit

Under the heading "Critical response" the first sentence states "The review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported an approval rating of 96%, with an average score of 8.3/10, based on 532 reviews". However, looking at Rotten Tomatoes' website shows more: the "Tomatometer" rating is indeed 96% based upon 531 reviews, but next to this is "Popcornmeter: 79% at 50,000+ votes" [1]. Is there any reason why that data should not also be included in the "Critical response" section? Bricology (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Popcornometer is a new name for that site's audience reviews, which have always been unreliable per WP:ROTTENTOMATOES as they cannot be verified. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Undefined footnote

edit

Hello Favre1fan93! In this edit, you added a footnote dependent on a citation named "TVLineAug2024". Thing is, there's no such citation in this article. Are you able to provide the required citation so that this article can be correctly referenced and fix the error? -- mikeblas (talk) 08:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The reference was there, it was just missing the opening '<'. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply