Talk:Boom (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editI heard this is pretty much a fancy soft-core porn move. So my question is was anal attempted in this movie? I'm looking for soft-core depictions of anal sex for a womens studies research project. Of course I have plenty of hard-core porn examples but you'd be surprised how little anal sex there is in soft-core porn. 69.244.117.28 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC).
Requested move 10 July 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– The presence or absence of an exclamation point is not sufficient disambiguation. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose – I'm pretty sure WP:DIFFPUNCT applies here (let alone the 2003 film having a ~176:1 pageview ratio with the 1968 film). JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 2nd, unless the 2003 one also uses an exclamation mark the presence of it probably distinguishes. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. Where film titles are concerned, WP:SMALLDIFFERENCES such as commas, ellipses, exclamation points or question marks are insufficient to disambiguate from titles with different marks or an absence of marks. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)