Talk:Bratz (film)

Untitled

Whoever wrote all the stuff in the plot, you rock.

Please can a sysop block editing on this article? Loads of teen girls keep adding lies to the article~ -24.92.43.153 08:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

This artical should be more nuetral, it really read like somebody with a vendetta for anything to do with the very real fact that some girls do have a passion for make-up etc if this doesnt change soon I'll come and do it okay >does a sturn face< xxx xxx xxx

==Character and cast sources==

Oh God, learn to spell.Luckyles 19:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the names which were added again. If there are any reliable sources for this information it needs to be cited. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Who the hell wrote the mistakes section?

I just finished polishing the mistakes section. Apparently, the writer thinks that wikipedia is some form of forum to write you're own personal reviews for a movie. It isn't. If you're going to add goofs, don't get creative and make it an iMDB comment (If you wan't to add your personal opinion, go the talk page, as I myself am doing right now). So I removed some direct attacks against the film with absurd goofs, and trimmed down some of the real ones. I have a feeling that whoever wrote it also made that You Tube video with alleged "bloopers" in High School Musical, which were way too inconspicuous to be noticed. By the way, talking in second person to the reader in an article isn't very objective. And why would they explain the exact reason of the goofs? Am I stupid? Don't I already know that goofs come from clummsy editing or writing? Isn't everyone else aware of that too? So, I've done some major editing. Whoever spotted all of those goofs should probabbly get a life. --Surten (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Surten

I don't want an "edit wrestle"!

Please stop editing the article saying that the movie is distributed by WWE Films. It's getting really, really annoying. The Bratz are fashion dolls, NOT action figures, and they're NOT interested in fighting, so leave the article alone, or the others will semi-protect this article because of that. 86.101.211.226 18:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I know, it's getting really annoying that they keep editing that back in.-24.92.43.153 21:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Direct-To-Video

I came from Circuit City's website, and they have it listed as a future release. This is more or less a confirmation that it will be released direct-to-video (i.e., not theatrically). I even posted the link, but if that doesn't work, then you can just go in through the front door, and search for it. Brittany Ka 13:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

No, it seems certain that the movie will be theatrically. I saw a trailer before Shrek the Third. --(trogga) 02:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I saw the trailer too. It looks abominably stupid. Brjatlick 01:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Irrelevent. I know what I saw. The movie will be released on August 10th. Circuit City has it listed for DVD release on August 10th, therefore... Brittany Ka 11:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Have you checked other online stores? --(trogga) 15:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you saw a dvd of a Bratz cartoon or something?

"Development Timeline"

This section reads like a magazine article, I think. I put the appropriate tag, however, if I am mistaken, and it is encyclopedic, then feel free to remove it. Nonetheless, it doesn't feel encyclopedic to me. Brittany Ka 13:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

DO NOT WANT. 24.244.163.249 19:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bratz2 large.jpg

Image:Bratz2 large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bratz2 large.jpg

Image:Bratz2 large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Drew Carey on The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson

Did anyone else see The Late Late Show where Drew Carey mentioned looking up this movie (...and some other things) on Wikipedia? -Hyad 05:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Someone has ditched my plot summary *sigh* what is the point of anyone going to see this film as you have just about included every little detail?Luckyles 08:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

WTF is a Bubbie?

Somebody please explain it better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.10.133.111 (talk) 03:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Bubbie

Bubbie is actually Yasmin's mum or a relative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxy2k7 (talk • contribs) 11:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Bubbie - From the special features

If you go into the special features, and you look under the passion for fashion section, the costume designer refers to Bubbie being the Auntie of Yasmin etc. A coppard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.216.105 (talk) 18:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Nathalia Ramos

When I was reading total girl, this is what i've found:

"On set I was known as the grandola (type pf cereal) queen. I promised Skyler one day that I'd get her some so she could try it. So I walked into the make-up trailer and saw her getting her hair done. I walked up and shoved the spoon of granola in her mouth. She looked up and said, "What are you doing?" It wasn't her. It was her double! I didn't know this poor girl." Nathalia Ramos (BRATZ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxy2k7 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Mistakes - Grammar

I am adding a mistake, the fact that Freshmen is displayed on the welcome sign (when the first walk in), but freshman is displayed on Merediths table. So, Welcome Freshmen is displayed on the sign on their way in, but Mandatory Freshman Check-In is displayed on Merediths table. Is this gramatically correct (Freshmen being plural and Freshman being singular). Please reply, as I do not want to add an incorrect peice of information. Also, out of interest, why was the mistake about Merediths USB Memory Stick removed. Was it because this is technically possible? A coppard (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

tiesiog puiku —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.59.15.218 (talk) 08:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Freshman/men

It says mandatory freshman check in... meaning, if you're a freshman, check in.

It makes more sense that mandatory freshmen check in... say the two out loud, the latter sounds weird. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.64.140 (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Seriously? This is very important.

This page has the word "c.o.c.k." written all over it and somebody needs to seriously edit the whole page and get rid of that inappropriate word. But since I didn't watch the movie, I can't really edit it (lol). --You got to grab your fear at the throat and throttle it into courage! The thing that can turn a passive, small town teen who sews her own clothes into a hard end, extermination machine! (talk) 19:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Title

The onscreen title is just Bratz. Every major review and every EL cited here except Rotten Tomatoes just calls it Bratz. It is not called Bratz: The Movie any more than Superman (1978 movie) is "Superman: The Movie" or Die Hard 2 is "Die Hard 2: Die Harder". --Tenebrae (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Page name

It says "2007" when there are no other films with just "Bratz" in them. Should the year be removed?--Eloc08 (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)