Talk:RC Celta de Vigo

Minor Flag Change

Manuel Carlos Mouriño Atanes made his fortune and lived in Mexico, he however was born in Spain. 86.134.2.145 (talk) 23:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

celtiña

The term "celtiña" refers to the team itself, not the fans. It is a fairly common mistake among non-Galician speakers, but it is incorrect and should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.7.139.215 (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm from Vigo and I couldn't agree more. We refer to the team as O Celtiña (Lovely/little Celta), not to the fans. We even do so when speaking Spanish, as in: ¿Cómo quedó el Celtiña? (What was the result of Celta's match?). I've just changed it.--VaiPolaSombra (talk) 21:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Name Change Proposal

Proposing the idea of moving this article from "Celta de Vigo" to "Real Club Celta de Vigo". The full name of the club should be the name of the article with the shortened common name featured more prevalently within it. --Blackbox77 (talk) 03:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree. Not that I'm particularly fond of Celta being royal, but the official name of the team is Real Club Celta de Vigo and I think that's what the title of the article should be.--VaiPolaSombra (talk) 21:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Deportivo de La Coruña which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celta de Vigo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160120150549/http://www.celtavigo.net:80/es/primer-equipo/plantilla to http://www.celtavigo.net/es/primer-equipo/plantilla

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposal for removal of 'de' in article title.

What are people's thoughts on removing 'de' from the article title? I feel it isn't necessary as this isn't used in the English translation. Media coverage of football proves this. Also, it is also common on Wikipedia, for example Atlético Madrid, Athletic Bilbao and FC Barcelona amongst others, do not have 'de' carried from their full name to their common name as seen in the article titles. I feel some consensus is required between all Spanish football club pages on Wikipedia, as at the minute it seems to be a little mixed. TGB13 (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 7 August 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) Kostas20142 (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

---

Celta de Vigo → RC Celta – As happened with FC Dnipro, now Celta removed "de Vigo" from its common denomination at their website and their short denomination at LaLiga website. Anyway, I don't understand why do we continue writing "Celta Vigo" instead of simply "Celta" as there is not any other notable team in Europe called "Celta". Asturkian (talk) 09:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

• Comment I must add that two months ago, there was a controversy between Celta's owner and the mayor of Vigo due to the works in the stadium; the owner threated to move the team to a bordering town. (Reliable sources in Spanish: Mundo Deportivo, El Mundo, ABC). Asturkian (talk) 09:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose. The official name is not the deciding factor under Wikipedia article title policy. Two quick Googles [1] [2] indicate that the current name is far more common, but in any case it's up to those proposing such a move to provide valid reasons for it, and this has not been done. Andrewa (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per Andrewa's reasons, and because this page has the same naming conventions as Racing de Santander, Racing de Ferrol, Rápido de Bouzas and so on. MYS77 ^✉ 20:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 23 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the page to RC Celta de Vigo, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 11:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

---

Celta de Vigo → Celta Vigo – The current name is some sort of halfway house between the club's full official name (Real Club Celta de Vigo or RC Celta de Vigo) and the widely accepted short name used by most English-language media (see BBC, Sky Sports, The Guardian and ESPN for examples). Either we should go with RC Celta de Vigo or Celta Vigo, not this bastard child of the two. – PeeJay 11:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 20:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Hhkohh (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

• Move to RC Celta de Vigo in line with standard naming conventions. GiantSnowman 09:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Well, there's a can of worms. Should I start an RM to get Inter Milan moved back to F.C. Internazionale Milano? – PeeJay 14:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
    • In an ideal world, yes, but we both know how that is going to go... GiantSnowman 14:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
• Support per AZ Alkmaar and Inter Milan. Unreal7 (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
• Move to RC Celta de Vigo per standard naming conventions as the GiantSnowman says In ictu oculi (talk) 10:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
• Move to RC Celta de Vigo per standard of using the club's proper name. We all know Inter Milan should be moved too ;) Number 57 11:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"2023–24 RC Celta de Vigo season" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2023–24 RC Celta de Vigo season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 21 § 2023–24 RC Celta de Vigo season until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)