Talk:Chilean rodeo

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wilfo1213, Beneasley.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Some recomendations for improvement

This isn't a GAN review, just some quick recomendations for improvement.

• Statements that are likely to be challenged and statistics need inline citations.
• Imperial measurements should be accompanied by the metric equivalent in brackets, and vice versa. A convertion template can be used, such as {{convert|5|m|ft|0}}.
• There should not be anything in the lead not mentioned in the rest of the article.
• Only full dates or dates with a day and a month should be linked.
• Web references need the author, publisher, publishing date and access date. Epbr123 (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 6, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Fail, very sparse overview, prose does not "flow," quite disorganized, long history section, little else, no idea what this competion is or what spectators need to know to enjoy the event. Has [[WP:NPOV}Neutrality]] issues, does not actually explain much about what actually happens, etc.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail, may be accurate as far as it goes, but not a lot of cites, no support for statements like "the greatest," many peacock words and unencyclopedic commentary

3. Broad in coverage?: Fail, article is very short, many red links, not well explained

4. Neutral point of view?: Fail, reads like a promotional brochure or ad copy, not an encyclopedic

5. Article stability? Pass, but it needs a LOT of work to get anywhere close to GA

6. Images?: Pass - could be better, but acceptable

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.

Plagiarism concerns

The "Criticism" section is directly copied from this webpage: http://www.liquisearch.com/chilean_rodeo/criticism.

Rishi (talk) 03:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

I think it's the other way around, looks like a wikipedia mirror to me, but we could ask some other folks to look into it. Montanabw^(talk) 00:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

It's the other way around. Liquisearch is a known mirror, and they credit wikipedia at the bottom of the page. Kuru (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Good to confirm. Montanabw^(talk) 08:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chilean rodeo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207161949/http://www.familia.cl/ContenedorTmp/Rodeo/rodeo.htm to http://www.familia.cl/ContenedorTmp/Rodeo/rodeo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)