Talk:Clear and Present Danger (film)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Doniago in topic Reception section too negative
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Random pictures
editAre the random pictures of actors and/or places somehow related to the movie really helpful? Looks a lot like inserting some pictures just for the sake of having some pictures... -- Imladros (talk) 11:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- There are only two photographs on the entire page. And they depict the key supporting actors in the film. They are very much relevant. It's not in any way different from other film articles on Wikipedia that also include images of actors from their respective films. Baffled12 (talk) 12:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Reception section too negative
editSeeing as the film holds an 80% approval rating, being generally positive, there should be greater emphasis on the positive aspects of why the film is regarded as such, seeing as the chosen sections from reviews for the film right now are all negative and critical, save for the highlighted blurb from the Washington Post article that is not even included in the actual body of general critical opinions on the film.2601:49:1:5316:3963:63AD:85B7:9C6 (talk) 04:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)