Talk:Damyanti Gupta

Latest comment: 8 days ago by Whitestar12 in topic Encyclopedic Tone

Encyclopedic Tone

edit

Hi! @BoyTheKingCanDance,

Thanks for your contributions. I see you added a tag stating the article is not written in an encyclopedic tone. I reviewed WP:TONE and as per the guidelines, I have avoided slang, colloquialisms, legalese, etc. Additionally, per WP:PRONOUNS, first and second person pronouns are not used in this article. The article adheres to WP:NOR and also attempts to avoid poetic language. The article also avoids peacock terms.

With that said, I am working on improving the verbiage and tone of the article. However, if you can point to any specific examples in the article where there isn't an encyclopedic tone, that would be helpful. Once we've improved the tone, I'd like to have the tag removed.

Thanks! Whitestar12 (talk) 20:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi my friend Whitestar12, what great work! You have actually improved it a lot, and in the ways I imagined you would. I'll remove the tag. Best wishes, and thanks for your collegiality, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Truly appreciate it! Thanks for taking a look and confirming.
Whitestar12 (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply