This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
SeenTitan appears to disagree with the statement around Smith and contaminated meat. I bring it here for discussion. The wording I like is "In 2012, she suggested meat contaminated with Escherichia coli could be given to poor people." This is backed by this citation which says, and I quote, "In 2012, the then Opposition leader tweeted that thorough cooking can kill E. coli bacteria, suggesting tainted meat could be fed to those in need". I think that's a pretty clear and direct citation for Smith's statement. In fact, it's hard to imagine a more direct citation without violating copyright. SeenTitan has previously falsely claimed Smith deleted that tweet (as of today, it is still up). In this series of edits, SeenTitan removed any mention of contaminated meat. This may have been accidental, as SeenTitan notes in the edit summary they are hoping to provide more context. Nevertheless, I strongly oppose several of SeenTitan's edits. I am, however, open to wording changes around Smith's suggestion to feed tainted meat to those in need. --Yamla (talk) 17:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
poor people aren't in need of meat, obviously that would be starving people.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
is it normal to just repeat every single thing media ever said about a person, directly ignoring quotes from them and instead preferring to report what some journalists felt about it instead?
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
On 3 January 2023Truthwins999 edited to include "During this time she shared opinions on healthcare, including her belief that cancer is preventable up to the fourth stage ... and that patients should seek donations from friends, family, and strangers for treatment ...". On 6 April 2023 I partially removed it with edit summary = "... According to the cited sources Ms Smith clarified / corrected those remarks." On 7 April 2023 re-inserted, with edit summary = "... Politically motivated whitewashing of article." I remind Indefatigable that WP:NPA and WP:BLPUNDEL are policies. Let's look at what the cited articles say. For "her belief that cancer is preventable up to the fourth stage" the cited source Edmonton City News quotes Ms Smith thus: "I want to take a moment to clarify a comment I made in a podcast last week about cancer that was misunderstood," said Smith. "I know that cancer can strike anyone, at any time with no relation to lifestyle. There are so many more options. If you diagnose early, then you can treat early. That’s what I was trying to say, albeit awkwardly." Thus the statement about Ms Smith's belief is contradicted by Ms Smith, as I said. For "and that patients should seek donations from friends, family, and strangers for treatment" the cited source a National Post opinion article says "She has since said that people could use their accounts only for services that aren’t covered by public health insurance — but only after her earlier statements had been made public." Thus the statement that Ms Smith in general favours financing by non-government e.g. strangers is contradicted by Ms Smith, as I said. Any other opinions? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Noting that a CBC article indicates Smith is under an ethics investigation for interference around the administration of justice. I'm stepping out shortly so don't have time to appropriately and neutrally add it to the article quite yet. --Yamla (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
