Talk:Delta Farce
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Cartridges
editOddly enough, the cartridges on that helmet look like cheap Warsaw Pact 7.62x54R.75.75.110.235 01:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
good spotting, they are rimmed so i guess you are right, thats funny
weird: being a pseudo-democrat, i thought this film was pretty funny. not offended by the war-jokes, nor annoyed by the DADT joke either.
its fun to laugh at retards!
Why is it that some bad movies have very long and detailed plot summaries?
- Wikipedia is not a fansite, nor is it a review site. We write articles based on how much information we have, not based on the quality of the work we are writing about. --Wack'd Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork! 21:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- People who watch these kind of movies have the most time on their hands and the worst writing skills (i.e. don't know what concise means). Jabberwockgee (talk) 23:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
"If there was any worse exuse for a soldier, I`d like to meet him!"
"Hey there sarge! Snap into a slim Jim!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Komix r kewl (talk • contribs) 22:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
LARRY THE CABLE GUY
editGIT R DONE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Komix r kewl (talk • contribs) 22:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
movie adaptation?
editHow is this movie "an adaptation of the 1973 novel "Gravity's Rainbow" by Thomas Pynchon" I don't get it. --Guthrie (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC) You don't get it because you're an idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.214.229.68 (talk) 12:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Failure of the Movie???
editThe article says that Larry blamed the movie's failure on Spider Man 3 and Shrek three, what? he can't take responsibility for making a a great movie and the others being FAR superior? Come On... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottForster (talk • contribs) 02:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Further reducing plot summary
editI'm wondering if anyone cares if I further reduce the plot summary. I did a once over today and I'll probably get around to doing another in the next couple days if no one objects. Jabberwockgee (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Shitty writing
editThis article itself is the most horrible piece of English-as-a-fifth-language I've ever read. It reads like I concluded some guy sniffing paint thinner in school was writ it. --John Moser (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh, John Moser, your comments are too funny. Hit the nail on the head. I never go to edit or talk in wikipedia but I had to see what kind of "intellectual" wrote this article. What planet is the writer of this article from, almost sounds like native U.S. English speaker but like Canadians slip up every now and then and refer to how many kilometers they walked, how many meters high something is, how many pints they drank, ooh or how many liters their car tank holds. English-as-a-fifth-language is too funny!!!!!!!! As was the title and every word in your comment is very talented and contains more info and entertainment than the whole "Sh!tty" article you comment on.
The Magnificent Seven
editI think this movie should be added to the template {{The Magnificent Seven}}. Like three amigos, I think it belongs to the same series. The US good men who save poor Mexicans from a villain!!--Maher27777 (talk) 22:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)