Talk:Demographic history of Vojvodina

Old talks

• Talk:Demographic history of Vojvodina/Archive01

Hungarian and Croat emigrees

I think that the noticeable emigration of Hungarians and Croats in the 1990s during Milosevic's reign (especially Hungarians) should be added. --PaxEquilibrium 21:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

If you check data about nationality of people who emigrated from Vojvodina during the 1990s, you will notice interesting fact that largest number of them were Serbs (regime of Milošević was equally bad for Serbs as it was bad for non-Serbs and if we would mention data about these emigrations, we should mention them correctly). PANONIAN 21:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

However unlike Serbs, those Hungarians and Croats left because they were Croats and Hungarians. I will never be able to forget things like Hrtkovci and other crimes against humanity conducted by Seselj... or that Catholic Church raised to the ground by the Unit. I know how miniature this crimes were (when compared to Srebrenica or Operation Storm), but they still deserve a mention - no? --PaxEquilibrium 18:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

So? If we mention how many Serbs fled from this region escaping from war and misery under the rule of Milošević, then I do not see why we cannot mention Croats and Hungarians as well. I mean, how you expect that minorities could feel safe in the country where members of majority nation could not feel safe? In another words, if we writte about these things, then we have to blame regime for these things, and not to blame ordinary Serbs, who were main victims of that regime. PANONIAN 16:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah; just write it. ;))) --PaxEquilibrium 14:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Why me? You proposed this, so you should write it right? However, I will look to improve anything that you writte. PANONIAN 21:16, 24

Thanks for Hrtkovci link Pax. Now I am more angry on PANONIAN !! Why ?? In article Bunjevci he is reverting any words which speak that Bunjevci are Croats or that they have come in today lands from territory where Croatians are majority. Because in article Hrtkovci is writen: "In 1737, about 1,600 Catholic Albanians from Klimenti clan came to Srem." I now know that PANONIAN hate Croats. Until now in my thinking he has been very great Serbian nationalist from Vojvodina which only want to show how Vojvodina has been always Serbian land. Now I know that he is Croatophobic. --Rjecina 19:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Bunjevci article in fact speak that part of Bunjevac population consider themselves Croats, but I only reverted "user" (or rather sockpuppet) who wanted to delete some details about those Bunjevci who do not consider themselves Croats. Regarding Catholic Albanians who settled in Hrtkovci, that is historical fact, so what you have against it? Do you hate Albanians or what? And one more thing: how can I be "great Serbian nationalist" when I only trying to remove greater Croatian and greater Hungarian POV from articles about Serbia? (an "great Serbian nationalist" would be engaged in pushing his POV into articles about neighbouring countries, the same thing that you doing here, by the way). PANONIAN 12:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Are the numbers for 1910 correct?

The book "A short history of the Yugoslav peoples" by Fred Singleton claims that the Hungarian census of 1910 showed that there were 421567 Magyarspeaking people, 381000 Serbs and 301035 Germans, and finally some 150000 Vlachs, Slovaks, Ruthenes, Russians,.... Who is right?Evilbu (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Difference between your data and data in article is not so great. Maybe I am mistaking but your census data for 1910 is from Banat, Baranya and Bačka (which has been part of Hungary inside Austro-Hungary). If you add to this numbers census data of Syrmia (which has been part of Croatia inside Austro-Hungary) then you numbers will be more or less OK (now mistake is around 10 %). If you are interested to read more about this you can look discussion on Talk:Creation of Yugoslavia --Rjecina (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Just one note about this: data that claim that there was more speakers of Hungarian than Serbian in 1910 could be indeed data for Banat, Bačka and Baranja region, but in such case this region was probably seen in its original borders (including parts of present-day Hungary and Romania as well). In parts of Banat, Bačka and Baranja recognized by the Peace conference as part of Yugoslavia there was 505.415 Serbs and Croats (of those about 400.000 were Serbs), 376.107 Hungarians, 316.107 Germans, etc. Of course, this is different area from territory of present-day Vojvodina (which includes Banat, Bačka and Syrmia and excludes Baranja). In this Hungarian source you can see 1910 data for territory of present-day Vojvodina: http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/hmcb/Tab21.htm 212.69.28.53 (talk) 16:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Corrections and additions needed

1953 and 1961 data needs correction. I don't believe that the number and share of Rusyns and Macedonians were exactly the same.
1981 data needs addition. There're Germans with less than 4,000 and no Macedonians that were over 15,000 in previous and next census. Kamarad Walter (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Vojvodina avars008.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Vojvodina avars008.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Demographic history of Vojvodina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714051014/http://curug.rastko.net/karte/index.html to http://curug.rastko.net/karte/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)