Talk:Employment discrimination law in the United States
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
California
editDo we want to go the route of having every state's employment discrimination laws summarised in this article? The other option, if we're interested in all states and not just California, is to make it a separate list article... keep the summary, but put the individual states somewhere else. What I don't think we need is details on California and nowhere else - no matter how much findlaw likes California ;) Thoughts? --Alynna 04:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- my name is James Daniels please look into why I was terminated from Goodwill to now program where I'm eligible by law to reentry 2607:FB91:20C7:CBCA:AC39:C212:9A06:2CA8 (talk) 19:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Maryland
edit49b sections 14-16 were repealed October 1, 2009 according to the current codes as hosted on LexisNexis. Is there is another section specifying the protections in Maryland? --Izno (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Employment discrimination law in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160909163923/http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/Publications_FEHADescr.htm to http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/Publications_FEHADescr.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091008133842/http://kchr.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/CF3FE160-96D2-40D3-B702-A25DD1ABF65C/0/040.pdf to http://www.kchr.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/CF3FE160-96D2-40D3-B702-A25DD1ABF65C/0/040.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070114092004/http://www.opm.gov/er/address2/Guide04.asp to http://www.opm.gov/er/address2/Guide04.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
SCOTUS ruling on LGBT discrimination
editde Vogue, Ariane; Cole, Devan (June 15, 2020). "Supreme Court says federal law protects LGBTQ workers from discrimination". CNN. Archived from the original on June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 15, 2020. Jerod Lycett (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Bostock v. Clayton County, U.S. (Supreme Court of the United States 2020-06-15), archived from the original on 2020-06-15. Jerod Lycett (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Move to a new title?
editThe article covers employment discrimination laws at the federal and state. These are a multitude of state laws, as many as there are states. Seems a more accurate name with repalce "law" with "laws". Would had moved the article myself already but wanted some input from contributing editors first, in case I was missing something. The right name would "Employment discrimination laws in the United States" (note the "s" in "laws"). If someone seconds me and there's no objection, go ahead and move it. Otherwise I'll try to be back after a few days and proceed after reading any comments left - if any. Mercy11 (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Mercy11: The article is complicated and unwieldy.
- I suggest a title change to "Discrimination law in the United States Federal government". The top level category is "Discrimination law", a second tier is "Discrimination law in the United States" which includes state and other non-federal law, and finally this article which is just federal law. This pattern allows uniformity if anyone wants to change name "United States" for other countries.
- The state-level law is messy and much less applicable than federal law, so I say kick all that to another article. Also, I could be mistaken, but I think it would be better to group all federal discrimination law together, and not just employment discrimination. I think most discrimination law is about employment, but for example, access to school programs seems to be a major issue in this discourse.
- I was looking at all this because at my university employer, I am asked to be aware of all these laws. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)