Talk:Flexity Swift

File:Tram in Galata Istanbul.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Tram in Galata Istanbul.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

explanation

The article currently asserts the Flexity Outlook is a legacy design originally developed by a company Bombardier acquired. The Flexity Outlook also made this assertion -- but without any references. I asked for references. I couldn't find any, and no one else provided any. I added a {{cn}} to that assertion here too. If this assertion can't be referenced it should be removed. Geo Swan (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flexity Swift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101017215916/http://www.lrta.org/Manchester/veh_new.html to http://www.lrta.org/Manchester/veh_new.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 13 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Flexity Swift. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:25, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

---

Bombardier Flexity Swift → Alstom Flexity Swift – I propose that this article be renamed in order to match the name changes made to other pages related to Bombardier transportation products that are now made by Alstom. See Alstom Flexity and Alstom Aventra.

Some sentence changes will be needed but see the two articles I’ve linked to see what would need to change. Maurice Oly (talk) 01:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

• Move to Flexity Swift, along with Bombardier Flexity Classic→Flexity Classic and Bombardier Flexity Outlook→Flexity Outlook. (Cf ongoing RM at Talk:Alstom Flexity which seems headed to be titled just Flexity). Those are common and concise names anyway, and eschew the Bombardier vs. Alstom issue. No such user (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
• Move to Flexity Swift, along with Bombardier Flexity Classic→Flexity Classic per No such user.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.